Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Govindammal Vs Thilakavathi
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 88 days in filing the above CMA.SR.No. 80189 of 2022.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable, the interest for the default period is ordered to be waived. Therefore, the delay in filing CMA.SR.No. 80189 of 2022 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in...
Senthil Kumar Vs Kathiresan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 88 days in filing the above CMA.SR.No. 80203 of 2022.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable, the interest for the default period is ordered to be waived. Therefore, the delay in filing CMA.SR.No. 80203 of 2022 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in...
Muthusamy Vs Sivakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 88 days in filing the above CMA.SR.No. 80200 of 2022.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable, the interest for the default period is ordered to be waived. Therefore, the delay in filing CMA.SR.No. 80200 of 2022 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in...
A.Soundararajan vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR A.Soundararajan ... Petitioner Vs. 3.S.Subramaniam ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of mandamus for the following reliefs:-(i) to direct the respondents to issue the order of up-gradation andpromotion order to the petitioner to the post of Electrical Inspector in terms of G.O.Ms.No.1633 PWD dated 25.11.1992 or otherwise on the basis of performance revealed in the Annual confidential records from 1985 onwards and to direct the respondents to consider and to promote the petitioner to the consequential promotional post of Senior Electrical Inspector from the date on which the third respondent is further promoted as Chief Electrical Inspector to the Government (Incharge) and to consider the claims of the petitioner for the post of Chief Electrical Inspector along with the third respondent and to promo...
A.Soundararajan vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR A.Soundararajan ... Petitioner Vs.Chennai 600 032. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of certiorari to call for the entire disciplinary proceedings and records in G.O.(3D).No.21 Energy Department dated 29.07.97 as conformed in G.O.(3D).No.31 dated 08.10.2001 on the file of the first respondent pertaining to the punishment of stoppage of increment for three years with cumulative effect and quash the entire proceedings and to grant such further or other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fir and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and render justice. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.Nanmaran Additional Government PleaderORDERThis matter came up for consideration before this Court on 19.06.2025. As there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter wa...
Dr.Deebiga vs the District Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Dr.Deebiga ... Petitioner Vs.1. The District Collector, O/o. District Collectorate, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri 636705.2. Murugan3. P.Ramu4. Sudha ... RespondentsWrit Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records in order dated 19.01.2022 issued by the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.14251/2021/A2 and quash the same. For Petitioner : Ms.Y.Kavitha For Respondents : Mr.N.Naveen Kumar, Government Advocate (for R1) *****ORDERThe instant writ petition has been filed challenging order dated 19.01.2022 passed by the first respondent.2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that thepetitioner had given a complaint against the second respondent, alleging that he had issued a false No Objection Certificate to the third respondent, who is none other than the petitioner's father. According to the p...
Rejitha Raghu vs C.Bharathi Priyan
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
Crl.M.P.No.2266 of 2025 in Crl.RC.SR.No.60486 of 2024G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 35 days in filing the above revision.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 35 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 26.06.2025 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is, otherwise inorder.bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
The Government of Tamil Nadu vs E.David Raj
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
CMP Nos.2277, 8088, 11032, 13430, 13661, 13698 and 13834 of 2025 in WA SR Nos.12109, 42207, 84853, 66282, 42208, 35001 and 40692 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andK.SURENDER, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Mr.E.Martin Jayakumar, learned appears for the respondents in all the petitions.2. Accepting the reasonsassigned in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are ordered, the delay of 433, 294, 433, 294, 294, 293 and 259 days respectively in filing the Appeals are condoned. [R.S.M., J.] [K.S., J.] 26.06.2025 jv 1/2 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M/s.Sundaram Finance Ltd., Vs Cement Carriers,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE M/s.Sundaram Finance Ltd., rep. by its Authorised Signatory ... Petitioner in all casesVersus1.Cement Carriers, rep. by its Proprietor ... 1st respondent in Arb.O.P. (Com. Div. Pankaj V Babaria Nos.64 to 66, 68 & 69 of 2025 1.Pankaj V Babaria ... 1st respondent in Arb.O.P. (Com.Div.) No.67 of 2025 2.Chintan Pankaj Babaria ... 2nd respondent in all cases Prayer in all cases: Arbitration Original Petitions (Commercial Division) filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint/substitute a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the differences and disputes between the petitioner and respondents under the Loan Agreement and Guarantee Deeds dated 27.07.2018, 30.06.2018, 30.06.2018, 31.07.2018, 30.06.2018 & 30.06.2018 in respect of Contract bearing Nos.N006700126, N006700125, N006700129, N006700182, N006700128 & N006700123 respectively.For Petit...
M.Elangovan vs N.S.Raja
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
Crl.M.P.No.12285 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No.48701 of 2021G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 1206 days in representing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. On perusal of the affidavit filed insupport of this petition, this Court finds no sufficient reason to condone the huge delay of 1206 days in representing the above appeal. Hence this petition is dismissed. 26.06.2025 bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »