Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
N. Subramaniya Prabhu and 3 others Vs Tmt. Supriya Sahu, I.A.S., and 3 ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Contempt Petition No.1720 of 2025 1.N.Subramaniya Prabhu 2.A.Beaula 3.P.Dhanabal 4.R.Lakshmi .. Petitioners Vs. 1.Tmt.Supriya Sahu, I.A.S. Principal Secretary to Government Health and Family Welfare Department Fort St. George, Chennai 600 009 State of Tamil Nadu2.Dr.T.S.Selvavinayagam Director (Personnel) 361, Anna Salai, Chennai 600 006 3.Dr.A.Arun Thamburaj Mission Director State Health Society Chennai 600 006 4.Dr.R.Rajamoorthy, MBBS, DCH Director Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services Chennai 600 006 .. Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the 1st and 4th respondents for willful disobedience and contempt of the directions of this Court in W.P.No.25427 of 2024 dated 03.09.2024. For Petitioners : Ms.L.Karthiga For Respondents : Mr.E.Sundaram Government AdvocateORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed on...
Vidhurushika vs the State of Tamil Nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.No.16866 of 2025 Vidhurshika ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary to Government, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. Central Prison Campus, Tiruchirappalli. Maveeran Camp, SLR, Melpakkam, Gummidipoondi, Q-Branch CID Police Station, Thanjavur. Crime No.1/2024 ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records in connection with the impugned order passed by the 1 st respondent in G.O.(1D)No.177 Public (Foreigners-II) Department, dated 22.04.2024 and quash the same as illegal and consequently permit petitioner to reside along with petitioner's mother and siblings at 73, Maveeran Camp, SLR Melpakkam, Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur District with suitable conditions.For...
RajaRajeswari Vs The State of Tamil nadu,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN RajaRajeswari Petitioner(s) /wife of the detenue Vs ...RespondentsPRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the entire records, relating to the petitioner's husband detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 vide detention order dated 13.03.2025 on the file of the 2nd respondent in pursuance of his order C3/D.O./26/2025 and quash the same as illegal, and consequently direct the respondents herein to produce the petitioner's husband namely Thiru.Indhiyan, S/o.Boopathi aged 29 years before this Court and set the petitioner's husband at liberty.For Petitioner : Mr.T.Meganathan For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak Additional Public ProsecutorORDERand When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned...
C.Chinnasamy vs the Inspector General of Registration
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ C.Chinnasamy : Petitioner Vs. 4.S.Muthusamy : Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue Writ of Mandamus directing the 3rd Respondent to conduct enquiry and cancel the Document No.1179/2002 made by 4th Respondent in Valayamadevi Village in Attur Taluk at Salem District in S.No.114/11B based on petitioner's representation dated 05.06.2024 and further direction directing the respondents 1 to 3 to consider the same within time limit fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Anantharaj For Respondents : Mr.Abishek Murthy, Government Advocate for respondents 1 to 3ORDERToday when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.2. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the ...
Manchanda Autos vs Tvs Credit Service Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU and CMP.Nos.10328 & 10330 of 2025 1.M/s.Manchanda Autos, Rep.by its Proprietor Mrs.Samarjit Kaur, Ground Floor, Plot No.72, Industrial Area, Phase 1, Chandigarh 160 002 Also at House No.2567, Sector 69, Mohali 160 002, Punjab. 2.Mrs.Samarjit Kaur 3.Mr.Birjyote Singh Petitioners vs. M/s.TVS Credit Services Limited Having its Registered Office at: Chaitanya, No.12, Khader Nawaz Khan Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. ...Respondent PRAYER: Arbitration Appeal filed under Section 37(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, read with Section 13(1)(a) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, praying to set aside the order passed by the Sole Arbitrator in I.A.No.1 of 2025 in A.C.P.No.1 of 2024 dated 26.03.2025. For Petitioners : Mr.Aakash Clinton For Respondent : Mr.ArunachalamORDERThe learned counsel for the appellant would submit that pending this appeal, the Award itself h...
M/S.Roca Bathroom Products Private Limited Vs Tanisha Sharma
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
Crl.MP.No.12355 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR.No.24366 of 2025G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed to dispense with the production of the certified copy of the order dated 04.09.2024 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Fast Track Court-II, Egmore at Allikulam in STC.No.7750 of 2024.2. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this criminal miscellaneous petition is ordered. 27.06.2025 lok Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise inorder.https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
R. Palanisamy (died) 1. C.Balasubramaniam, Vs Vivekanandan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
inThese petitions are filed (i)under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, to condone the delay of 445 days in filing the petition to set-aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first appellant (ii) to set-aside the abatement caused due to the death of the first appellant and (iii) to bring on record the petitioners 2 and 3, who are the legal heirs of the deceased first appellant and rank them as appellants 3 and 4, in S.A. No.53 of 2019, respectively.2. The reasons attributed in the affidavit filed in support of these petitions are accepted and there is no serious objection on the side of the respondents. Hence, these petitions are allowed. 3.The Registry is directed to carryout necessary amendments in the Second Appeal No.53 of 2019 and list the matter after three weeks. bga bga in...
S. Chandran and another Vs S.GANESAN and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
A.No.2384 of 2025 in C.S.No.111 of 2019K.KUMARESH BABU,J.This application has been filed to reopen the plaintiff side evidence in the above captioned suit.2. Mr.R.Nandakumar, learned counsel for the first respondent would submit that he has no objection in allowing the present application.3. Heard both sides.Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent has no objection in allowing the present application and being satisfied with the same, the same is ordered as prayed for. Gba 27.06.2025 (1/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 1 of 1...
S. Chandran and another Vs S.GANESAN and 2 others
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
A.No.2385 of 2025 in C.S.No.111 of 2019K.KUMARESH BABU,J.This application has been filed to recall the PW1 in the above captioned suit.2. Mr.R.Nandakumar, learned counsel for the first respondent would submit that he has no objection in allowing the present application.3. Heard both sides.Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the first respondent has no objection in allowing the present application and being satisfied with the same, the same is ordered as prayed for. Gba 27.06.2025 (2/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 1 of 1...
R.Suganya vs the Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-27-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN and W.M.P.No.15892 of 2025 R.Suganya ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009. Prison Department, Whannels Road, Ansari Estate, Pallipalayam Police Station, Namakkal, (Crime No.310/2010) ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent vide proceedings in 23563/Tha.Ku3/2024 dated 08.04.2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequently to direct the respondents to grant parole without escort for petitioner's husband by name Arun @ Arunkumar (Convict No.23563), S/o.Ganesan, aged about 36 years, who is now under incarceration at Central Prison, Coimbatore, for a period of 1...