Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
A.Arwin vs State Rep by the Inspector of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR A.Arwin ... Petitioner Vs. The State represented by, The Inspector of Police, (Crime No.772 of 2024) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.772 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sivakumar For Respondent : Mr.R.Vinothraja Government Advocate (Criminal Side)ORDERLearned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect.M.NIRMAL KUMAR, J.ham2. In view of the submissions and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. 25.06.2025 ham To1. The Principal Special Judge for EC & NDPS Act, Chennai.2. The Inspector of Police,3. The Public Prosecutor, Hig...
Pongiammal vs the District Collector Cum
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated: 25.06.2025Coram:THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA and Mrs. Pongiammal ... Petitioner Vs.Aanaimalai Block,Coimbatore District. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents not to lay the road in the land situated in Survey No.1030/1 of Periyapothu Village, Pollachi Taluk, Combatore District belongs to the petitioner except in accordance with law and pass orders. For Petitioners : Mrs.T. Hemalatha For Respondent-1 : Mr.V. Manoharan, AGP For Respondents 2 and 3 : Mr.M. Muthusamy, GAPage No.1/4ORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner died and though she sent several communications to the legal heirs of the petitioner, there is no reply. Hence, counsel prays that the writ petition may be dismissed.2. Recording the said submissions made by the learned counsel forthe petitioner, this writ petition is dismis...
M/S.SLO STEELS LIMITED Vs M/S.Jayaam Galvanizers Private Ltd.
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
Crl.O.P.No.18204 of 2025 in Crl.A.SR. No.2545 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J Leave granted. 25.06.2025 lok Note : Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
K. Suresh Vs Mr. Narasimhan Eswar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated :25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA Cont.P.No.741 of 2025 K. Suresh ... Petitioner vs- Narasimhan Eswar ...Respondent Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 to punish the respondent for willfully and deliberately violating the order in W.P.No.15487 of 2015 dated 22.10.2024. For Petitioner : Mr. M.V.S Rajeev Amruth for M/s. Balan Haridas For Respondent : Mr. S.R. Rajagopal, Senior Advocate for Allwin Godwin, Niranjan PandianORDERThe Contempt Petition has been filed seeking to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the orders passed by this Court in W.P.No.15487 of 2015 dated 22.10.2024.2. It is informed that the orders of this Court 22.10.2024, as modified by the Division Bench of this Court in C.M.P.No.10475 of 2025 in W.A.No.1364 of 2025 dated 25.04.2025, has been complied with.3. Recording the above statement, the contempt petition is closed. Index: Yes/NoSpeaking ...
Chennai Port Authority Vs Ravichandran P
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
CMP Nos.7922, 8045 and 8142 of 2025 in WA SR Nos. 19659, 19641, 19650 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andK.SURENDER, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavits filed in support of these petitions, these petitions are ordered. [R.S.M., J.] [K.S., J.] 25.06.2025 jv 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
N.Selvi Vs Pongiyammal
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
1 C.M.P.Nos.5224 to 5226 of 2024 inR.KALAIMATHI, J.C.M.P.No.5224 of 2024 has been filed to condone the delay of 64 days in filing this petition, CMP.No.5225 of 2024 has been filed to set aside the abatement caused on the death of the 12th respondent in the above appeal and C.M.P.No.5226 of 2024 has been filed to bring on record the respondents 18 and 19 as the legal representatives of the deceased 12th respondent and rank them respondents as respondents 19 and 20 in the above second appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petitions, these Civil Miscellaneous Petitions are allowed. kkd Note: Registry to effect amendment in CMP.No.114 of 2023. 2 C.M.P.Nos.5224 to 5226 of 2024R.KALAIMATHI,J.kkd in ()...
The Principal Secretary to Government vs G Vijayakumar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
CMP No.3642 of 2025 in WA SR No. 19959 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andK.SURENDER, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is ordered, the delay of 144 days in filing the Appeal is condoned. [R.S.M., J.] [K.S., J.] 25.06.2025 jv 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
L.Chandran vs the Secretary
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Writ Petition No.5549 of 2025 L.Chandran ... Petitioner ..Vs.. Chepauk, Chennai 600 005. ... RespondentsPRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 2nd respondent's impugned Letter No.VaeAaPa3/122497/2024 dated 24.10.2024 and consequentially directing the respondents to grant suitable promotion to the petitioner as per his eligibility and seniority as per the Service Rules G.O.Ms.No.248 Agri Department dated 02.05.1984 Amendment No.1(a) iii w.e.f.02.05.1994 and to pay the proportionate monetary benefits from the date of eligibility and for such other reliefs, within the period as stipulated by this Court.For Petitioner : Mr.D.Nellaiyappan For Respondents : Mr.V.NanmaranORDERThe learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has given a letter on 20.06.2025, r...
R.Gunasekaran Vs Thiru. Chellappan,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN R. Gunasekaran ... PetitionerVersusThiru. Chellappan, The Deputy Manager (Accounts), Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kovai) Ltd., Erode Region, Erode. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the order of this Court dated 13.03.2024, in W.P.No.6400 of 2024. For Petitioner : Mr. V. Ajay Khose For Respondents : Mr. M. Murali Vinoth, Senior Counsel.ORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for non-compliance of the order dated 13.03.2024, passed by this Court inW.P.No.6400 of 2024, and thereby directing the respondent to pay arrears of wages and differential benefits in respect of Gratutity and Encashment of Leave as per wage settlement, dated 24.08.2022. Those amounts shall be paid within a period of six (6) weeks from the...
G. Suseentharan Vs Thiru. G. Selvan and another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN S. Suseentharan ... PetitionerVersus1.Thiru. G. Selvan, Managing Director, No.37, Mettupalayam Road, Coimbatore 43. 2.Thiru. P. Mohankumar, General Manager, Erode Region, Chennimalai Road, Erode 1. ... Respondents Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondents for their wilful disobedience and non-compliance of the order and directions passed by this Court in W.P.No.139 of 2022 dated 02.07.2024.For Petitioner : Mr. R. Krishnanswamy For Respondents : Mr. M. Murali Vinodh, Senior CounselORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondents for their non-compliance of the order dated 02.07.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.139 of 2022, thereby directing the respondents to provide alternative employment to the petitioner, for a period of one year, within a period of two weeks from ...
- ‹ Prev
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- Next ›
- Last »