Skip to content

Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Jun 27 2025

Jayam Traders vs P.Anbazhagan

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-27-2025

Crl.O.P.No.25298 of 2024 in Crl.A.SR. No.23866 of 2024 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J Leave granted. 27.06.2025 lok Note : Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is otherwise in order. 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 27 2025

Veeramuthu Vs Dr. R. Brindha Devi, I.A.S

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-27-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Veeramuthu S/o. Late. Mottaiyan Padaiyatchi, No. 3/18, Appamasamuthiram Village, Selliyampalayam, Near Green Tech College, Narasingapuram Post, Attur Taluk, Salem District. Petitioner(s) Vs Respondent (s)PRAYER Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of contempt of Courts Act 1971 to punish the Respondent herein with appropriate terms for willful and deliberate disobedience of the directions of this Court order dated 07.12.2020 passed in W.P.No.17137 of 2020. For Petitioner(s): Mr.D.Goppinathan For Respondent(s): Mr.G.Velu, Additional Government PleaderORDERWhen the matter was taken up for hearing today, learned Additional Government Pleader produced GO Ms No.478 dated 29.09.2022 and submitted that the revisional authority is the District Revenue Officer and therefore, as per the new guidelines, the order was passed by the DRO and not by the District Collector.2. This Court is s...


Jun 27 2025

Gowri vs Mangalakshmi

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-27-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI Gowri ... Petitioner/Appellant Vs.1. Mangalakshmi2. Sandhanavathy3. Banumathy4. Velayutham Babu ...Respondents/RespondentsPrayer: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 to condone the delay of 56 days in filing the above second appeal. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Subramanian For Respondents : Ms.V.Srimathi for R1 and R2ORDERThis petition has been filed to condone the delay 56 days in filing the above second appeal.2. A memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner tothe effect that the 1st respondent Mangalakshmi W/o late Kuppusamy passed away on 30.01.2025 and the legal heirs of the deceased 1 st respondent are the respondents no.2 and 3, who are already on record.3. Memo is taken on record.4. Head the learned counsel for the petitioner.5. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed insupport of this petiti...


Jun 27 2025

K.Senthil Kumar, Vs Mr. S.Arun Raj and another

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-27-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH Contempt Petition No.1788 of 2025 K.Senthil Kumar .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Mr.S.Arun Raj District Collector Collectorate Chengalpattu Chengalpattu District 2.Mr.Ganesan Tahsildar O/o.The Tahsildar Mathuranthagam Chengalpattu District .. Respondents Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for having willfully and wantonly disobeyed theorder of this Court dated 04.10.2024 made in W.P.No.29289 of 2024.For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arokia Mani Raj For Respondents : Mr.Stalin Abhimanyu Additional Government PleaderN. ANAND VENKATESH, J.gyaORDERWhen this matter was taken up for hearing today, the proceedings of the District Collector, Chengalpattu, dated 20.06.2025, was placed before this Court.2. Recording the same, this Contempt Petition is closed. 27.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No gya Cont. Petn. No.1788 of 2025...


Jun 27 2025

Munusamy vs Suganthi

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-27-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 27.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN C.M.P.No.14662 of 2025 in C.M.A.SR.No.18590 of 20251. Munusamy and another. ... Petitioners -vs-1. Suganthi and 4 Others ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr.U.Baranidharan For Respondents : Mr.M.Selvam *****ORDERJ.NISHA BANU,J., AND M.JOTHIRAMAN,J., This Civil Miscellaneous Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 39 days in filing the appeal.2. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, this Court is of the view that the delay may be condoned and the matter may be argued on merits.3. Accordingly, this petition is ordered and the delay is condoned.4. Registry is directed to number the appeal and post it "for admission" on 03.07.2025, if the same is otherwise in order. (J.NISHA BANU,J.) (M.JOTHIRAMAN,J.) 27.06.2025 ar...


Jun 26 2025

K.Venkateswara Rao(Deceased), V.Padma vs a.Balaiya

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-26-2025

Crl.M.P.No.113 of 2024 in Crl.A.SR.No.25634 of 2023G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 778 days in filing the above appeal.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 778 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 26.06.2025 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Appeal, if it is, otherwise in order. bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 26 2025

Ramesh vs the State Rep.by, the Inspector of Police,

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-26-2025

Crl.M.P.No.398 of 2025 in Crl.RC.SR.No.67437 of 2024G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.This petition has been filed to condone the delay of 699 days in filing the above revision.2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record.3. Being satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this petition, the delay of 699 days is condoned and the petition is ordered. 26.06.2025 Note: Registry is directed to number the Criminal Revision, if it is, otherwise inorder.bkn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 26 2025

K. Krishnakumar vs the Secretary to Government

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-26-2025

CMP No. 8793 of 2025 in WA SR No.35062 of 2024R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andK.SURENDER, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Mr.S.Yashwanth, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.2. Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is ordered, the delay of 253 days in representing the Appeal is condoned. [R.S.M., J.] [K.S., J.] 26.06.2025 jv 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 26 2025

S.Amarnath vs K. Ganesh Babu

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-26-2025

CMP No. 10182 of 2025 in WA SR No.6323 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andK.SURENDER, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is ordered. [R.S.M., J.] [K.S., J.] 26.06.2025 jv 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...


Jun 26 2025

R.Venkatachalapathy Vs The Director of Elementary

Court: Chennai Orders

Decided on: Jun-26-2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.Nos. 1 & 2 of 2015 and WMP.No. 29168 of 2016 R.Venkatachalapathy ..Petitioner Vs College Road, Chennai -600006 Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. Uthiramerur, Kancheepuram District.4. D. Dhanasekaran 5.A.Lakshmi Sarasathi ..RespondentsWrit Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus, calling for the records of the 2nd and 3rd respondent in relation to the seniority list as on 01.01.2014 prepared for the post of B.Ed Middle School Headmaster in Uthiramerur Panchayat Union in Proceedings No. Nil dated Nil and quash the same and issue a consequential direction to the respondents to place the petitioner above the 4th and 5th respondents in the above said seniority list at appropriate place with all benefits and pass such further or other orders.For Petitioner: Mr.R.Saseetharan For Respondent...



AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial