Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
K.K.Sadhasivam, vs the Management of Sundaram Clayton Limited,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDated : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA and WMP.No.3542 of 2024K.K.Sadhasivam ... Petitioner Vs. The Management of Sundaram Clayton Limited Rep. by its Managing Director SCL, MTH Road, Padi Chennai - 600 050. ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records and to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.P.(ID) No.52 of 2023 by the I Additional Labour Court at Chennai, dated 18/12/2023 and pass such further other orders as this Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.For Petitioner : Mr.A.Thiruvilankumar For Respondent : Mr.A.P.Venkatesh Prasad for Mr.G.Anand GopalanORDERThe workman who is the petitioner before this Court seeks to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the I Additional Labour Court at Chennai in I.A.No.1 of 2023 in O.P.(ID) No.52 of ...
S. Ramesh, Vs Rajinikanth,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN S.Ramesh .. Petitioner/Versus/Mr.Rajinikanth Puzhal, Chennai-600 066. .. Respondent PRAYER: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, pleased to punish the the respondent for having disobedience of the order passed by the Hon'ble High Court in Crl.O.P.No.15305 of 2024, dated 01.07.2024. For Petitioner : Mr.R.Arunkumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji Government Advocate (Crl.Side)ORDERIn continuation of the order passed by this Court on 19.06.2025, the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) has verified that the RCS notice has been received by the complainant and the matter is posted on 10.07.2025 for further proceedings.Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.rpl2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the contempt petition confirms the same.3. In view of the above facts and circumstances, this Contempt Petition stands closed. 26.06.2025 Index : Yes/No Neutra...
Mr.Anil D Wadhwa Vs No Respondent
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
hIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 26-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU AND OP NO. 640 OF 2023,A NO. 2380 OF 2025,A NO. 2379 OF 2025 Mr.Anil D Wadhwa S/o.Late Mr.Doulatram T.Wadhwa, Flat No.8, 3rd Floor Plot No.170, New No.17, Old Door No.80, 2nd Street, F Block, Anna Nagar East, Chennai - 102. ......Applicant in all applications Vs No Respondent nil .........Respondent(s) For Applicant in all applications: Mr.N.NAGU SAHCOMMON ORDERA.No.2379 of 2025 has been filed to permit the applicant to cancel the sale agreement dated 23.01.2024 registered as Doc.No.770 of 2024 at S.R.O.Selaiyur, in respect of the schedule property entered between the petitioner on behalf of the minor Chetan and the Purchaser Dinesh in respect of the minor property.2. A.No.2380 of 2025 has been filed to permit the applicant to sell the minorsproperty more particularly described in the schedule to the Judges Summons to the purchaser Mr.R.Satish, (PAN-AASPS3293D and Aadhaar No.9492 ...
A. Soundararajan vs He Chief Secretry to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR A.Soundararajan ... Petitioner Vs.2.The Commissioner & Secretary to Government, 3.D.S.P.S.Kanaga Roy 4.M.Veeraputhiran 5.S.Gurusamy ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to call for the records in connection with G.O.Ms.No.2162, Public Works Department dated 16th December 1986 and quash the same by a writ of certiorarified mandamus or any other writ or order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit directing the respondents to prepare a roster in accordance with G.O.No.525, Social Welfare Department dated 27th June 1980 with effect from 1980. For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondents : Mr.V.Nanmaran Additional Government PleaderORDERThis matter came up for consideration before this Court on 19.06.2025. As there was no representation on 19.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the capt...
A. Soundararajan vs He Chief Secretry to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR A.Soundararajan ... Petitioner Vs.Chennai 600 032. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of certiorari to call for the entire disciplinary proceedings and records in G.O.(3D).No.21 Energy Department dated 29.7.97 and conformed in G.O.(3D).No.31 dated 8.10.2001 on the file of the first respondent pertaining to the punishment of stoppage of increment for three years with cumulative effect and quash the entire proceedings. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.V.Nanmaran Additional Government PleaderORDERThis matter came up for consideration before this Court on 19.06.2025. As there was no representation on 19.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today, inspite of matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is n...
T.Uthanu, vs the Collector,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR T.Uthanu ... Petitioner Vs. Virudhunagar District ... Respondent Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of mandamus to call for the records relating to proceedings of the District Collector, Virudhunagar in Na.Ka.P2 1743/2003 dated 31.03.2003 and direct the respondent herein to promote the applicant as Block Development Officer on par with his juniors with all consequential service benefits. For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.H.Ravikumar Government AdvocateORDERThis matter came up for consideration before this Court on 23.06.2025. As there was no representation on 23.06.2025, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today, inspite of matter being listed under the caption 'for dismissal', there is no representation for the petitioner either in the pr...
N.Mallika vs the Director,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR 1.N.Mallika 2.A.Ramasamy 3.S.Paul Raj 4.S.Thangavel Aasari ... Petitioners Vs.3.T.Uthanu ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for the records of the respondents resulting in the 2nd respondent's impugned orders dated 22.10.99 passed in ROC.No.P3/11559/98 and order dated 08.12.99 passed in ROC.No.P3/11559/98, quash the same and direct the respondents to restore their original seniority and fix the seniority above the 3rd respondent as per the confirmed seniority list dated 22.05.92 and 4.9.92 vide ROC.No.P3/6777/91-12 and ROC.No.P3/13127/92 issued by the 2nd respondent.For Petitioners : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.H.Ravikumar Government AdvocateORDERThis matter came up for consideration before this Court on 23.06.2025. As there was no representation on 2...
A. Soundararajan vs the Secretry to
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 26.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR A.Soundararajan ... Petitioner Vs.3.S.Subramaniam ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to issue the order of up-gradation and promotion order to the applicant to the post of Electrical Inspector in terms of G.O.Ms.No.1633 PWD dated 25.11.1992 or otherwise on the basis of performance revealed in the Annual confidential records from 1985 onwards and to direct the respondents to consider and to promote the applicant to the consequential promotional post of Senior Electrical Inspector from the date on which the third respondent is further promoted as Chief Electrical Inspector to the Government (Incharge) and to consider the claims of the applicant for the post of Chief Electrical Inspector along with the third respondent and to promote to the said post.For Petitioner...
Parthiban Vs Raju
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 88 days in filing the above CMA.SR.No. 80210 of 2022.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable, the interest for the default period is ordered to be waived. Therefore, the delay in filing CMA.SR.No. 80210 of 2022 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in...
Kalidass Vs Vennila
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-26-2025
in This Petition has been filed to condone the delay of 88 days in filing the above CMA.SR.No. 80214 of 2022.2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant(s) and perused the material available in the record.3. On being satisfied with the averments stated in the affidavit filed insupport of the petition, and finding the reason assigned by the petitioner(s) to be justifiable, the interest for the default period is ordered to be waived. Therefore, the delay in filing CMA.SR.No. 80214 of 2022 is condoned.4. Accordingly, this Civil Miscellaneous petition is allowed.5. Registry is directed to list the above Civil Miscellaneous Appeal after numbering the same, if they are otherwise in order. rri rri in...