Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by, The Inspector of Police, Vs R.SATHYA P ...
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY.J., The matter is listed under the caption for being mentioned.2. In the order dated 20.06.2025 passed in Crl.M.P.No.11568 of 2025 in Crl.O.P.No.23645 of 2023, the Crl.O.P.No.23645 of 2023 is incorrectly mentioned as Crl.O.P.No.23645 of 2025.3. In view of the above, the Registry is directed to mention the correct criminal original petition number as Crl.O.P.No.23645 of 2023 in the aforesaidorder and issue a fresh copy of the order after carrying out the said correction.stn D. BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY. J., stn...
Sumathy Vs The Tahsildar
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
and (Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR.J.,)Captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' ['WMP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of original 'impugned Memorandum dated 13.02.2023 bearing reference Na.Ka.Aa2/1831/2023 passed by the first respondent' [hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].2. Learned counsel for writ petitioner submits that only photocopyof the impugned order was served on the writ petitioner. Learned counsel drew the attention of this Court to a paragraph of the support affidavit, which reads as follows: ''The respondent serve the Xerox copy of the impugned memorandum dated 13/02/2023 Hence dispense with production of the Xerox copy of impugned order.'and3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case on hand and taking note of the nature of the matter, aforementioned reason is accepted.4. In the light of the narrative th...
Uzhaippor Urimai Iyakkam Vs K. Veeraraghava Rao
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALAUzhaipopor Urimai Iyakkam, Reg.No.3077 CNI, Repr. by its President K.Bharathi, Thozhar Koodam, No.19C, Mariamman Koil Street, Kalyanapuram, Ambattur, Chennai - 600 053. ... Petitioner Vs. K.Veeraraghava Rao, ... Respondent PRAYER : Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 (Central Act 70 of 1971) to punish the respondent for committing contempt of Court by disobeying the order dated 22.03.2024 for this Court in W.P.No.1333/2024. For Petitioner : Mr.S.KumaraswamyFor Respondents : Mr.P.Kumaresan Additional Advocate General Assisted by Mrs.C.Meera Arumugam Additional Government PleaderORDERThis contempt petition has been filed to punish the respondent for wilfully disobeying the order passed in W.P.No.1333 of 2024 dated 22.03.2024.2. Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learnedAdditional Advocate General, appearing for the respondent submitted that th...
S. Murugesan vs the Management of Sahuwala Flour Mills
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
CMP No.4740 of 2025 in WA SR No. 142493 of 2024R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andK.SURENDER, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is ordered, the delay of 97 days in representing the Appeal is condoned. [R.S.M., J.] [K.S., J.] 25.06.2025 jv 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Tvl.Velmurugan Timber Industries Vs Union of India
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
2025:MHC:1495IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR W.P.Nos.6943, 6945 & 6946 of 2021 and W.P.Nos.29266 & 29270 of 2023 WP.Nos.6943, 6945 & 6946 of 2021 Velmurugan Timber Industries, Rep. by its Managing Partner, No.16/1B, Red Hills Road, Kathirvedu, Chennai-600 099. .. Petitioner in WP.6943, 6945 & 6946/2021vs 1.Union of India Represented by its Secretary, North Block New Delhi 110 001. 2.Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs North Block, New Delhi 110 001. 3.Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005. 4.The Commissioner, Under Secretary to the Government of India, Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, Ministry of Finance. 5.State Tax Officer, Group IV/Inspection, Intelligence-I, Greams Road, Chennai-600 006. .. Respondents in WP.6943, 6945 & 6946/2021Prayer in WP.No.6943 of 2021 : PETITION filed under Article 226 ...
THE NEWS MINUTE, Vs M/s.Ocean Lifespaces India Pvt Ltd
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
A.No.2436 of 2025 in C.S.No.250 of 2024K.KUMARESH BABU,J.This application has been filed to condone the delay of 31 days in filing the written statement of the fifteenth defendant in the above captioned suit.2. Ms.Jayasudha, learned counsel for the respondents 1 & 2 would submit that he has no objection in allowing the present application.3. Heard both sides.Considering the averments made in the affidavit filed in support of this application and also taking into consideration that the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 & 2 has no objection in allowing the present application and being satisfied with the same, the application is ordered as prayed for and the delay is condoned.Gba 25.06.2025 (2/3) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No. 1 of 1...
The Commissioner Of GST and central Excise Vs Sundaram Finance Limited
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
C.M.P.No. 4891 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No. 25567 of 2025Dr. ANITA SUMANTH, J.andN.SENTHILKUMAR, J.(Order of the Court was made by Dr. ANITA SUMANTH., J.) For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and there being no serious objection put forth by the respondent, the delay of 6 days in filing the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is condoned and this Miscellaneous Petition is ordered.2. Registry is directed to number the Civil MiscellaneousAppeal, if it is otherwise in orderand list the same 'for admission' in due course. [A.S.M, .J] [N.S, .J] 25.06.2025 ssm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
M. Tirumurugan, vs Mr. Elangovan and Another
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN M. Tirumurugan ... PetitionerVersusMr. Elangovan, The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, No.12, Ramakrishna Road, Salem 636 007. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.17408 of 2024 dated 04.07.2024. For Petitioner : Mr. N. Desinghu For Respondents : Mr. K. Raja, Senior CounselORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for non-compliance of the order dated 04.07.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.17408 of 2024, thereby directing the respondent herein to pay the interest on the belated payment of the terminal benefits to the petitioner at the rate of 6% per annum, commencing from the date of the retirement, till the date of actual disbursement...
D. Bright Joseph Vs A.D. Seshadri
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25-06-2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU in D. Bright Joseph S/o.Late J.Devadoss, D-101, Raheja Regency, 147, Santhome High Road, R.A.Puram, Chennai 600 028. Applicant(s) Vs A.D. Seshadri Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh 517 589. and 13 Others Respondent(s) For Applicant(s): Mr.S. Thanka Sivan For Respondent(s): Mr.Vineet Subramani (For R1 to R6) Mr.V.Prakash (Senior counsel) For Mr.Adrian D.Rozario (For R7 to R10)ORDERThis application has been filed, seeking to implead the applicant as a party defendant in the present suit.2. The instant suit has been filed under Section 92 of C.P.C for framing a scheme with respect to the first defendant and for further other reliefs.3. Since the applicant herein has been also holding various posts under the first defendant, I do not find any impediment in ordering this application as prayed for.4. In fine, this application in A.No.1550 of 2025 in C.S.No.86 of 2022 stands ordered as pra...
K.Shanmugam, Vs Mr. A.J.Mohammed Samsudin,
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN K. Shanmugam ... PetitionerVersusMr. A.J. Mohammed Samsudin, The Commissioner, Arni Municipality, Arni Town, Tiruvannamalai 632 301. ... Respondent Prayer:- Contempt petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for wilful disobedience of the order dated 19.08.2024, in W.P.No.14563 of 2024 under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971. For Petitioner : Mr. K. Shakespeare For Respondents : Mr. P. Srinivas, Senior CounselORDERThis Contempt Petition has been filed to punish the respondent for non-compliance of the order dated 19.08.2024, passed by this Court in W.P.No.14563 of 2024, directing the respondent to restore the water connection to the petitioner if otherwise eligible, in accordance with law.2. Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondent produced acopy of letter from the Municipality of Arni, vide in Na.Ka...
- ‹ Prev
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 22
- 23
- 24
- 25
- 26
- Next ›
- Last »