Chennai Orders Court June 2025 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Government of Tamil Nadu Vs Manual Arasu.S
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
CMP No.1428 of 2025 in WA SR No. 4847 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andK.SURENDER, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is ordered, the delay of 265 days in filing the Appeal is condoned.2. The Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise inorder and post on 30.06.2025.[R.S.M., J.] [K.S., J.] 25.06.2025 jv 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
Puducherry Road Transport vs the Managing Director
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2008 Puducherry Road Transport Corporation Labour Progressive Union under Registration No.1095/RTU/98 being represented by its Secretary V.Karunakaran having its Union Office at No.89, Second Cross Street D.R.Nagar, Puducherry -605 013. ... Petitioner Vs. Raja Nagar, Puducherry. ... RespondentsPrayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of certiorari calling for the impugned non notified New Recruitment Rules which was issued to the Petitioner Union under the Right to Information Act, 2005 by the First Respondent herein under F.No.36/PRTC/Admn./RTI/08/162 dated 14.03.2008 and quash the same. For Petitioners : No appearance For R1 : Mr.R.SreedharORDERThis writ petition earlier came up for consideration before this Court on 23.06.2025. On the said date, Mr.Ilankumar, learned counsel on record for the...
S. Maheswaran vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.No.3 of 2008 1.S.Maheswaran 2.T.K.Rajasekaran 3.P.Swaminathan 4.P.Saravanan 5.P.Perumal 6.ARA.Arul Arasu 7.I.Eswaran 8.R.Sivakumar 9.P.Kannammal 10.S.Selvakumar 11.E.T.Samson 12.S.Mani 13.A.Jayalakshmi 14.N.Manivannan ... Petitioners Vs. 1.The Secretary to Government, 2.T.Chinnaraj 3.B.Jayakumar 4.B.Subramaniam 5.R.Balasubramaniam 6.V.Sidhannan 7.P.Murali ... Respondents *R4 to R7 impleaded as per Court order dated 22.08.2008 in M.P.Nos.1 & 2 of 2008.Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of the first respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by the first respondent in letter Ms.No.1392 Home (Pol.2) Department dated 28.09.2007 and quash the same and direct the first respondent to revise the seniority of the petitioners in the post of Deputy Su...
E.Kalaimani Vs The District Collector
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR and W.M.P. No.2344 of 2023 in W.P.No.2263 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.2349 of 2023 in W.P.No.2267 of 2023 E.Kalaimani ... Petitioner in W.P.No.2263 of 2023 E.Veerasamy ... Petitioner in W.P.No.2267 of 2023 Vs. 1.The District Collector, Kanchipuram District, Kanchipuram. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, 3.The Revenue Tahsildar, 4.The Revenue Inspector, Padappai Circle, Kancheepuram District. ... Respondents in both WPs Page Nos.1/5Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus forbearing the respondents from proceeding to evict the petitioners from the lands measuring 1.90 acres in S.F.No.49/7, Salamangalam Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District and from the lands measuring 1.30 acres in S.F.No.49/2, Salamangalam Village, Kundrathur Taluk, Kancheepuram District as per the order d...
K.S.Ramakrishnan Vs The Commissioner of Police
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR K.S.Ramakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs. Egmore, Chennai 600 008. ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to theorder bearing Na.Ka.No.1243/20539/Pa.Pi 2(1)/Va/2012 dated 08.04.2014 and22.04.2015 from the files of the second respondent and the order bearing Na.Ka.No.Pa Pi 4(1)/54/18889/2014 dated 24.09.2014 from the files of the first respondent and quash all the three orders insofar as it denies promotion to the petitioner as Special Sub-Inspector of Police as per G.O(Ms) No.15, Home (Pol.V) Department dated 07.01.2010 and consequently direct the respondents to promote the petitioner as Special Sub-Inspector with effect from 01.11.2012 by granting due seniority and all service and monetary benefits within a timeframe. For Petitioner : Mr.K.M.Rames...
State of Tamil Nadu Vs K.M.R. Metal Mart
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
2025:MHC:1461IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.06.2025CORAM :THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SENTHILKUMAR Tax Case No.71 of 2025 The State of Tamil Nadu represented by the Joint Commissioner (CT), Coimbatore Division, Coimbatore. .. Petitioner vs Tvl.K.M.R.Metal Mart, No.82, N.H.Road, Coimbatore. .. Respondent Prayer : PETITION filed under Section 60 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 against order dated 28.08.2023 made in CTSA No.13 of 2018 on the file of the Tamil Nadu Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (Additional Bench), Coimbatore.For Petitioner : Mr.C.Harsha Raj Special Government PleaderORDER(Order of the Court was made by Dr.ANITA SUMANTH.,J) Learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the petitioner would submit that the issue that arises for consideration relating to reversal of input tax credit under Section 19(2)(v) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 is covered against the State by a decision of this...
K. Ezhil Murugan vs the Secretary to Government
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and W.M.P.No.30889 of 2016 & M.P.Nos.3 & 4 of 2009 K.Ezhil Murugan ... Petitioner Vs. 5.V.Arumugam 6.A.Rukmani 7.V.Raj 8.G.Hajira Begum9.E.Prema 10.P.Usharani 11.G.Sivakumar 12.A.Shanthi 13..R.Gomathi 14.K.Anandhi ... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of declaring the selection of respondents 5 to 14 to the post of Operation Theatre Assistant in regular vacancy in Government Kilpauk Medical College, Hospital, Chennai 600 010 based on interview dated 28.03.2008 as null and void and consequently issue direction to the respondents 1 to 4 to consider and appoint the petitioner to the post of Operation Theatre Assistant in Government KMC Hospital, Chennai 600 010 pursuant to his possessing necessary qualification from 28.03.2008 with all service and attendant benefits.For Petitioner : No appearanc...
K.Ravikumar vs the Tamil Nadu Electricity
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED : 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR and M.P.Nos.2 and 3 of 2009 1.K.Ravikumar 2.D.Balakrishnan 3.N.Saravanan ...Petitioners Vs ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the select list for the posts of Helpers in Class IV Service in the 1 st respondent Board published on 27.02.2009 for the year 2008 and quash the same and direct the respondents to consider for selection of candidates for the posts of helpers in the 1st respondent Board on the basis of employment exchange seniority alone subject to possession of minimum eligibility criteria. For Petitioners : Mr.N.Umapathi For Respondents : Mr.K.Rajkumar Standing counsel for TANGEDCOORDERThe learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayer in this writ petition has become infructuous. He also made an endorsement to that effect i...
The Principle Secretary to Govt. Vs A.SUGUMAARAN
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
CMP No.2546 of 2025 in WA SR No. 12548 of 2025R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.andK.SURENDER, J.[Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.] Accepting the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the petition is ordered, the delay of 244 days in filing the Appeal is condoned. [R.S.M., J.] [K.S., J.] 25.06.2025 jv 1/1 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis...
S.Swaminathan and 7 others Vs No Respondent
Court: Chennai Orders
Decided on: Jun-25-2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 25.06.2025CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KUMARESH BABU 1.Mr.S.Swaminathan 2.Mr.S.Krishnamurthy 3.Mrs.Lalitha Ranganathan 4.Mr.S.Srinivasan 5.Mrs.Jayanthi 6.Mrs.Kasthuri 7.Mrs.Malathi 8.Mrs.Vasanthi PetitionersPRAYER: Original Petition filed under Section 372 of the Indian Succession Act 1925 and Order XXV Rule 6 of Original Side Rules, prays that this Hon'ble Court to grant a succession certificate may be granted in favour of the fourth petitioner herein viz., S.Srinivasan, with the power to collect the debts and to receive the accrued interest on the Saving Bank Account which is specified in the schedule.For Petitioners : Mr.M.MaruthupandianORDERThe petitioners seek Succession Certificate in favour of the 4th petitioner in respect of the securities held by Late Mr.S.Balasubramanian, who died intestate on 28.10.2023.2. The petitioners submit that their father Late.Mr.R.Subramanian @R.S.Mani got married to one Mrs.Ananthalakshmi and...
- ‹ Prev
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 20
- 21
- 22
- 23
- 24
- Next ›
- Last »