Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Arul Jothi vs State Rep by

Arul Jothi vs State Rep by

Type Court Judgment Court Chennai Orders Decided Jan 06, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1735192

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Chennai Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL OP/3280/2023

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arul Jothi

Respondent

State Rep by

Excerpt

in the high court of judicature at madrasdated : 06.01.2025coramthe honourable mr.justice p.velmurugan and crl.m.p.no.1965 of 20231. arul jothi2. senbaga valli3. poovarasan4. harish5. sowendar6. vijaya ... petitioners vs.1. the state rep.by inspector of police,2. susila ... respondentsprayer: criminal original petition is filed under section 482 cr.p.c./ 528 bnss 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the case pending investigation in crime no.83 of 2018 dated 21.03.2018 as against the petitioners. for petitioners : mr.s.praveennath for respondents : mr.s.sugendran additional public prosecutor for r1orderthis criminal original petition is filed to quash the f.i.r. in crime no.83 of 2018 dated 21.03.2018 pending on the file of the first respondent-police.2. learned additional public prosecutor appearing for the firstrespondent-police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in crime no.83 of 2018, charge-sheet was filed through e- filing on 30.12.2024 vide e-filing no. ltn-202401206 before the learned judicial magistrate, vaniyambadi.3. since the first respondent-police has completed theinvestigation and filed the charge-sheet before the learned magistrate concerned, nothing survives for adjudication in this criminal original petition. accordingly, this criminal original petition is dismissed as infructuous. the petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy in the manner known to law. consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. index : yes/no neutral citation case : yes/no speaking order : yes/no ms to1. the judicial magistrate, vaniyambadi.2. the inspector of police, 3.the public prosecutor, high court, madras. p.velmurugan, j ms

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN and Crl.M.P.No.1965 of 2023

1. Arul Jothi

2. Senbaga Valli

3. Poovarasan

4. Harish

5. Sowendar

6. Vijaya ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The State Rep.by Inspector of Police,

2. Susila ... Respondents

Prayer: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS 2023, to call for the records pertaining to the case pending investigation in Crime No.83 of 2018 dated 21.03.2018 as against the petitioners. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Praveennath For Respondents : Mr.S.Sugendran Additional Public Prosecutor for R1

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition is filed to quash the F.I.R. in Crime No.83 of 2018 dated 21.03.2018 pending on the file of the first respondent-Police.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the first

respondent-Police, on instructions, submitted that on completion of investigation in Crime No.83 of 2018, charge-sheet was filed through e- filing on 30.12.2024 vide e-filing No. LTN-202401206 before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi.

3. Since the first respondent-Police has completed the

investigation and filed the charge-sheet before the learned Magistrate concerned, nothing survives for adjudication in this Criminal Original Petition. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed as infructuous. The petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy in the manner known to law. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No ms To

1. The Judicial Magistrate, Vaniyambadi.

2. The Inspector of Police, 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. P.VELMURUGAN, J ms

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Chennai Orders · 2025 Same Parties Arul Jothi vs State Rep by Same Judge Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan
Public prosecutor Speaking order Pertaining to high court The State

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales