Andhra Pradesh Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Gaddam Laxmaiah and Others Vs. the Commissioner and Inspector General, ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.20683 of 2012 and W.P.No.2192 o30. 4-2013 W.P.No.20683 of 2012 Gaddam Laxmaiah and others .. Petitioners The Commissioner and Inspector General,Registration and Stamps Department, M.J. Road, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioners : Sri Srinivas Polavarapu Counsel for respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Government Pleader for Revenue Counsel for respondent Nos.3 to 5 : Sri Avinash Desai HEAD NOTE: ?CASES REFERRED:1. MANU/AP/0656/2012 - W.P.No.25686/2011, dt. 10-7-2012 2. 2009(7) SCC 36.3. (2012) 1 SCC 65.4. 2006(6) ALT 52.(FB) 5. MANU/SC/1267/2010 = 2012(3) ALT 5.(SC) 6. 2012(4) ALD 41.7. 2009(6) ALT 22.8. AIR 193.P.C....
S. Bhavani Vs. Jana Chaitanya Real Estate Development
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The complainant is the appellant. She filed the appeal F.A.NO.644 of 2012 contending that the order of the District Forum dismissing her application filed invoking Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act is arbitrary and against the principles of law. The appellant has filed F.A.No.422 of 2012 challenging the order of dismissal of her application which was filed subsequent to the dismissal of P.P. filed earlier. 2. The appellant contended that the time limit for compliance of its order commences for the appellant from the time the respondent discharged its obligation and informed the appellant the quantum of development charges to the appellant. It is contended that the District Forum failed to see that the respondent had not anywhere in its written version mentioned the time for payment of and quantum of development charges. It is contended that the District Forum having found that the appellant paid total sale consideration, it ought...
K. Madhusudhan Rao Vs. M/S. Lodha Healthy Constructions and Developers ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-30-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The complaint is filed seeking direction to the opposite parties to hand over possession of apartment No.800 on 8th floor in Beverly Hills Tower in Lodha Bellezza Complex, to pay a sum of `32,98,816/- towards compensation, Rs.5,46,210/- towards rents, Rs.41,34,940/- towards the amount debited to the housing loan account, Rs.10,00,000/- towards mental agony and costs of the complaint. 2. The averments of the complaint are that the complainant on being assured by the second opposite party that he would arrange for sanction of loan to purchase apartment in Lodha Bellezza Project, booked apartment bearing number 800 on 8th floor in Beverlly Hills Towers in Lodha Bellezza Project for consideration of Rs.2,30,73,876/- and he paid booking advance of Rs.4,50,000/- on 8.08.2009. The opposite party no.1 informed the complainant that he had to pay two more installments of Rs.46,61,576/- else the amount paid by him would be forfeited and that agreem...
R. Jagade Vs. Smt. R. Ren
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY F.C.A.No.45 of 2008 (Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) 29-04-2013 R.Jagadeesh ..Appellant Smt. R. Renuka ..Respondent Counsel for the appellant:Sri J. Kanakaiah Counsel for the Respondent:Smt. Ramani Jonna HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred JUDGMENT:Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The appellant is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage took place on 23-03-2003, and they were also blessed with a son. Thereafter, they are living separately. The appellant filed FCOP No.259 of 2006 against the respondent in the Family Court, Secunderabad, under Section 10 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'), for a decree of judicial separation. It is stated in the O.P. that though they were in good relations for some time, the respondent was behaving in a peculiar manner, subsequently. According to him, the respondent used to wake up only at 9:00 a.m., and was not doing any household wor...
Midwest Granite Priavate Limite Vs. the Government of A.P. Rep. by the ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.No.652 o29. 04.2013 Midwest Granite Priavate Limited ...PETITIONER The Government of A.P. rep. by the Secretary to the Government, Industries and Commerce, Hyderabad and others. ...RESPONDENTS HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the Petitioners : Sri T.Sridhar Counsel for the respondents 1to 3: G.P. for Industries and Commerce. ^Counsel for the respondent 4: Smt. N.Sobha ?Cases referred:1. 2011(1)AL2. AIR 198.SC 123.3 AIR 196.SC 29.4 AIR 195.SC 1.5 AIR 196.SC 50.6 AIR 197.SC 55.7 AIR 196.SC 1.8 (2009) 12 SCC 74.ORDER : This Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring proceedings bearing No.7632/R6-1/2005 dt 30-12-2009 of 2nd respondent and Memo No.6977/M.11(1)/2009-3 dt 28.10.2009 of 1st respondent as arbitrary, illegal, ultra vires, unjust and unconstitutional.2. The brief facts leading to the lis are set out hereunder :3. The petitioner is a Private Limited Company incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. It is e...
Sri Krishna Devloor (D.S. Krishna) (Died Vs. N. Madhavi and Othe
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L .NARASIMHA REDDY THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKER CCCA No.84 of 2010 (Judgment of the Bench delivered by the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) 29-04-2013 Sri Krishna Devloor (D.S. Krishna) (died) per LR ...appellants Vs. N. Madhavi and others ...Respondents Counsel for the appellants : Sri B.V. Subbaiah, Sr. Counsel Counsel for the Respondents : Sri D. Prakash Reddy, Sr. Counsel HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred NIL JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) This appeal is filed against the judgment and decree dated 22-03-2010 passed by the Court of IX Additional Chief Judge (Fast Track Court), City Civil Court, Hyderabad. For the sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to, as arrayed in the suit. The deceased-1st plaintiff (hereinafter referred to, as 'PW-1') filed the suit against the defendants for the relief of specific performance of agreement of sale, in respect of the suit schedule property, a plot of about 1100 sq. yards ...
Namuduri Srinivasa Sreeramachandra Murth Vs. K.Radh
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONBLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA F.C.A.Nos.296 of 2010 and batch 29.04.2013 Namuduri Srinivasa Sreeramachandra Murthy ... Appellant (in both the appeals) And K.Radha ... Respondent (in both the appeals) Counsel for the appellant: Sri Pappu Srinivasa Rao Counsel for the respondent: Sri B.Anjaneyulu : : ?Citations: Nil F.C.A.Nos.296 and 299 of 2010 COMMON JUDGMENT : (Per LNR,J) These two family Court appeals, under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 are between the same parties. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment. The appellant is the husband of the respondent. Their marriage took place on 12.04.2007 at Hyderabad. The respondent was employed in ICICI Bank. It appears that loan of about Rs.2 lakhs was raised by the family of the respondent from the said Bank. At the threshold of the marriage itself, the appellant expressed his displeasure about the employment of the respondent and the borrowing of the loan to ...
A.Yadagiri Vs. the Chief Election Commissioner, Hyderab
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO W.P.No.23648 o29. 04.2013 A.Yadagiri ...PETITIONER The Chief Election Commissioner, Hyderabad and others ...RESPONDENTS HEAD NOTE: Counsel for the Petitioner : Sri S.Ramachandra Rao representing Sri K.R.Prabhakar. Counsel for the respondents 2 and 3: G.P. for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development Counsel for the respondent 4: Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana ?Cases referred:1. (1969) 1 SCC 40.2 2005 (5)ALD 74.3 1999(5) ALT 71.(D.B.1999. (5) ALD 58.8. SCC 36.1. SCC 28.7 2009 (1) ALD 57.8 2003 (5) ALT 1 (D.B.) 9 (2004) 8 SC10. AIR 196.SC 47.11(2003) 6 SCC 67.12(1990) 2 SCC 37.13 (2004) 13 SCC 52.14 (2009)13 SCC 13.110. SCC 67.ORDER: Heard Sri S. Ramachandra Rao-learned counsel representing Sri K.R. Prabhakar for the petitioner; the learned Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development for respondent Nos.2 to 3; and Sri Vedula Venkata Ramana for the 4th respondent 2. This writ petition is filed to call for the records relating to order dt.21...
Miss Meher Bano Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep by Its
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-29-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION No.13243 o29. 04-2013 MISS MEHER BANO .. PETITIONER GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINICIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT ENERGY DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD AND OTHERS .. RESPONDENTS Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Syed Mushtaq Ahmed Counsel for the respondents: Sri P. Laxma Reddy : ?CITATIONS: ORDER: This Writ Petition is preferred by a 51-year-old daughter of Sri Syed Khundmir, who had retired on 31.03.1991 after serving as a Personnel Officer with the Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation (AP TRANSCO) at Hyderabad. Prior to his death Sri Syed Khundmir filed his pension papers with the AP TRANSCO disclosing his family particulars. He declared Smt. Sajida Bano as his wife and also disclosed the names of his six daughters and one son, duly mentioning the respective dates of birth of those individuals. It is not in dispute that Sri Syed Khundmir received all his pensionary benefits so long as he was alive and...
Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Class-ivem Vs. the Government of Andhra P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.13051, 18722 o26. 04.2013 Andhra Pradesh Panchayat Raj Class-IV Employees Central Association, Hyderabad, rep. by its President & others. The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary (Services), GAD & others. For petitioners: Sri D.Linga Rao, Advocate. For Respondents 1 to 5: G.P. for Services-II. For Respondent No.6: Sri P.Raghavendra Reddy, Standing Counsel for Zilla Parishad. For Respondents 7 to 9: Sri K.Venkateswarlu, Advocate. For Respondents 10 & 11: Sri Bhajarang Singh Thakur, Advocate. : CITATIONS:1. 2005 (2) ALT 46.(F.B) 2. (2003) 2 SCC 63.3. AIR 199.SC 112.C/15 WRIT PETITION Nos.13051 & 18722 of 2010 COMMON ORDER : (Per Justice R.Subhash Reddy) Both the writ petitions are filed questioning the order, dated 29.04.2010, passed by the A.P. Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, in O.A.No.860 of 2009. W.P.No.13051 of 2010 is filed by the Andhra Pradesh Panchayat...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »