Andhra Pradesh Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S. Shriram Chits (P) Ltd., Rep. by Its Branch Manager Vs. Lakshmiset ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in CC 145 of 2010 on the file of District Forum, Guntur, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as stated in the complaint are that the complainant is a subscriber of a chit for Rs.2,00,000/- to be subscribed at Rs.5,000/- per month for a period of 40 months. On 18-2-2006 he participated in the auction relating to chit SPMX-5/35 agreeing to forego an amount of Rs.30,100/- but when he tried to withdraw the prize amount, he was informed that he stood as a guarantor to one Mr.Seshaiah who became a defaulter and the opposite party filed a suit in O.S.No.39/2004 against the said Seshaiah and his guarantors. The complainant submitted that he was never informed about any suit proceedings and addressed a letter to the opposite party on 17-4-2006 that he never stood as a guarantor and wants to contest the suit proceedings. On 28-4-2006, the opposite party replied stating that his prize money was kept in abeyance an...
Challa Sambi Reddy Vs. the Branch Manager, Life Insurance Corporation ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-16-2013
M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.288/2011 on the file of District Forum, Warnagal, the complainant preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainants son during his life time has agreed to insure his life with the opposite parties and the agent of opposite party No.1 had obtained his signatures on proposal form for Jeevan Anand (with profits) (with Accident Benefit) at Mulugu of Warangal District and accordingly proposal for life insurance was made on 03-3-2008 and he paid a sum of Rs.6,270/- towards half yearly premium for which opposite party No.1 had passed a receipt for policy bearing No.688082125 for Rs.2,00,000/- for a term of 18 years and the risk commenced from 03-3-2008. The complainant submitted that his sons instalment premium was due on 03-9-2008 but he could not pay the same due to heavy expenditure for his mothers treatment and on 01-10-2008 he approached opposite party No.1 office to pay Rs.6,270/-...
P.Venugopal Rao and Another. Vs. the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, G ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.11221 OF 201.15-04-2013 P.Venugopal Rao and another. The Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, South Block, New Delhi-110011 And 4 others. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Babuji Tenneti Counsel for Respondents: Sri Y.V.Ravi Prasad, Standing Counsel for Cantonment Board, Secunderabad. : ?Cases referred: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed by two individuals seeking a writ of mandamus for declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not issuing hall-tickets to them to appear for the examination for the post of Sanitary Inspectors, as departmental candidates, as illegal. The case of the petitioners is that they are presently working as Safaiwalas with the Cantonment Board at Secunderabad. The Cantonment Board has issued an employment notification inviting applications from eligible candidates for various posts, amongst which, three posts of Sanitary Inspectors were also advertised. Two of these three posts are m...
Smt.Gutti Sangeetha Vs. Gutti Venkata Raju @ Bobbi
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY And THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.N.BHATTI F.C.A.NO.183; 184 o15. 04.2013 Smt.Gutti Sangeetha Gutti Venkata Raju @ Bobbi Counsel for the appellant : Sri P.R.K.Amarendra Kumar Counsel for respondent : S.A.V.Ratnam : : ?Citations: COMMON JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) These two appeals arise out of a common order dated 14.12.2010 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam in O.P.No.778 of 2007 and O.P.No.257 of 2008. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as arrayed in F.C.A.No.183 of 2011. The appellant is the wife of the respondent. Their marriage took place on 30- 04-2006 at Visakhapatnam. Shortly thereafter, the respondent filed O.P.No.439 of 2006 in the Court of the Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam, under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short "the Act") for a decree of restitution of conjugal rights against the appellant. It is stated that the appellant expressed her...
M/S. Mahavir Lok Chamber Ownerâs Welfare Association Vs. M/S. Mah ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in E.A.87/2008 in CC No.300/2006 on the file of District Forum-I, Hyderabad, the complainant preferred this appeal U/s.27 A of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The complainant association filed CC No.300/2006 before the District Forum-I Hyderabad seeking direction to the opposite parties to rectify the defects including complete flooring in the cellar and rectification of roof leakages or in the alternative to direct the opposite parties to pay the total expenditure to be incurred by the complainant association for controlling/preventing the seepage of water in the cellar for Rs.7,50,000/- in addition to compensation, labour expenses and costs. The District Forum based on the evidence adduced Exs.A1 to A17 and C1 Advocate Commissioners report allowed the complaint filed by the Flat Owners Welfare Association and directed the opposite parties to rectify the defects within 30 days or pay a sum of Rs.7,50,000/- with interest at...
Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by Its General Manager and A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.181/2010 on the file of District Forum-II, Krishna at Vijayawada, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is the owner of Chevorolet Optra Mangam vehicle bearing No.AP07 AS 2222 and insured the same with opposite parties for a sum of Rs.8,62,332/- under policy No.1803792311003405 and cover note No.10900078889 for the period from 03-10-2009 to 02-10-2010. While so, on 27-11-2009 the vehicle met with an accident and was fully damaged and the same was reported to Beemadolu P.S and a case was registered U/s.184 (b)/177 of M.V. act. The complainant intimated the accident to the opposite parties through toll free number and on the advice of 2nd opposite party photographs were taken and the vehicle was shifted to Orange Auto Pvt. Ltd., which is the authorized service centre of Chevrolet company. The complainant submitted that thereafter he was informed...
M/S Hotal Swarna Palace, Vijayawada, Rep Vs. the Govt of A.P., Reptd b ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.11133 o12. 04.2013 M/s Hotal Swarna Palace, Vijayawada, Reptd by its Proprietor-Muttavarapu Srinivasa Rao The Govt of A.P., Reptd by its Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Hyderabad and two others. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri A.Manoj For Sri Ghanta Rama Rao Counsel for the Respondents: AGP for Prohibition and Excise : ?CITATIONS: NIL The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to set aside the notice in proceedings in Rc.No.600/10/A7, dated 30.01.2013, of respondent No.3, whereby he has levied 10% additional licence fee for the alleged enclosures put up by the petitioner for consumption of liquor in its Bar and Restaurant. At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise has fairly conceded that in cases of this nature, this Court has been directing the authority concerned to treat the impugned demand as notice and the licensees were permitted to subm...
M. Sukender Vs. Smt. S.M. Shirisha
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-12-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G. SHANKAR F.C.A.No.118 o12. 04-2013 M. Sukender Smt. S.M. Shirisha Counsel for the appellant : Sri V. Roopesh Kumar Reddyu Counsel for the Respondent : Sri P. Rana Praveer HEAD NOTE: ?Cases referred JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L. Narasimha Reddy) The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was performed on 13-08- 2006. Within a short time thereafter, differences have arisen between them. The respondent filed O.P.No.5 of 2009 before the Additional Family Court, Hyderabad, seeking divorce against the appellant under Section 13(1) (ia)(ib) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short 'the Act'). She pleaded that prior to the marriage itself, the appellant and his family members demanded dowry of Rs.10 lakhs; valuable articles, and marriage expenditure, and that demands have been complied with. She further pleaded that after the marriage, the appellant and his parents demanded additional dowry of R...
Sri Pratapa Seetharama Sastry and AnoThe Vs. Sri Seethepalli Kutumbayy ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.30526 of 2012 and batch (W.P.Nos.24468, 33025, 33461, 34075, 34099, 34545, 34905, 34965, 35338, 35441, 35473, 35598, 35737, 35868, 35997, 36084, 36430, 36471, 36859, 37359, 37906, 28461, 34231, 35505, 38844, 30016, 32176, 33370, 33453, 33535, 33923, 34535, 34596, 34604, 34898, 34959, 35476, 35483, 36918, 36937, 37291, 38067, 39740, 37607, 33282, 33267, 33272, 33872, 34254, 34969, 34523, 35257, 35166, 27915, 32179, 32408, 33956, 34197, 34202, 34513, 34521, 34544, 34559, 34611, 34732, 34820, 34821, 34828, 34830, 35019, 35058, 35156, 35499, 36083, 31426, 32030, 32055, 34774, 35043, 35344, 35559, 35808, 38385, 32690, 33218, 33442, 35225, 34018, 34635, 34662, 35110, 35144, 35165, 35183, 35235, 38221 and 38231of 2012) 31-12-2012 W.P.No.30526/2012 Raavi Satish The State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Registration & Stamps) Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others HEAD NOTE: Counsel for petitioner : S...
City Furnitures, Rep. by Sri Shaik Shajahan and Sons Vs. V.V. Seshacha ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-10-2013
Mrs. M. Shreesha, Incharge President Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.100/2012 on the file of District Forum, Kadapa YSR District, the opposite party preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant purchased one dressing table for Rs.5,000/- and one dining table with four chairs for Rs.15,000/- totalling to Rs.20,000/- on 09-2-2012 from opposite party shop. The complainant submitted that he found cracks to 4 chairs in the month of March 2012 i.e. within one month after purchase and to one of the chairs, the bottom portion of the leg was sealed with polythene paper and gum metal paste fixed to the crack had come out and a small broken part was found. The complainant brought the same to the notice of the opposite party in April, 2012 who expressed that they would paste with metal gum paste and submitted that big items imported from Malasia were received with cracks and the furniture would be sold after doing polish work. The complainant submitt...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »