Andhra Pradesh Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Khalida Begum and Another Vs. the Life Insurance Corporation Ltd., Div
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No. 30752 of 2012 and Batch 02-04-2013 Khalida Begum and another The Life Insurance Corporation Ltd., Division Office at Opposite Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad Rep.by its Divisional Manager Claims and another. Counsel for the petitioners: Sri M.A.Barifor Md.Ajmal Ahmed Counsel for the respondents : Sri Bathula Raj Kumar : CITATIONS: Writ Petition Nos. 30752, 30753, 30754, 30755, 30756, 30757, 30758, 30759, 30760, 30761, 30762, 30763, 30764, 30765, and 30766 of 2012 COMMON ORDER: These writ petitions arise out of common issues of facts and law. Hence they are heard and being disposed of together. The petitioners are claiming through one or the other two persons, namely, Mohd.Mohtashim Azmi and Mahmooda Begum. Sri Mohd. Mohtashim Azmi has taken as many as 13 insurance policies with different insurance companies such as the Life Insurance Corporation of India, Allianz Bajaj Life Insurance Company Limited, Kotak Mahindra Old Mutu...
Maruti Ispat and Energy Private Limited, C Vs. the Central Power Distr ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.3707 OF 201.02-04-2013 Maruti Ispat & Energy Private Limited, Corporate Office at Rama Towers,5-4-83, 2nd floor, TSK Chambers,M.G.Road, Secunderabad, rep. byits Managing Director, Sri Pramod Agarwal. The Central Power Distribution Company Limited of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its V.C. & M.D. Mint Compound,Hyderabad, and others. Counsel for appellants : Sri M.P.Chandramouli. Counsel for respondents : Sri O.Manohar Reddy. HEAD NOTE: CASES REFERRED: ORDER The short issue that arises for consideration in this writ petition is whether the petitioner company is to be charged for consumption of power at the rate applicable to 11 KV (Rs.3.52 Ps) or 33 KV (Rs.3.25 Ps). By order dated 14.02.2012, this Court directed the Central Power Distribution Company of Andhra Pradesh Limited (APCPDCL) to charge the petitioner company for consumption of power at Rs.3.25 Ps. per unit, being the rate applicable to 33 KV, with effect from 26.06.2...
M/S. Narne Estates Private Limited Rep. by Its Managing Director and O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member) 1. This is an appeal preferred by Narne Estates Private Limited against the order of the District Forum along with it an application F.A.I.A.No.9 of 2013 u/s 15 of C.P.Act (R/w Sec.5 of Limitation Act) to condone delay of 574 days on the ground that it had received the copy of the order on 20.04.2011. Thereafter the petitioners filed appeal on 12.8.2011 along with delay petition. The petitioners counsel did not inform the return of the appeal and he returned original order copy only without grounds of appeal copy, affidavit and petitions. Therefore the petitioner was unable to know the date on which the appeal was returned. The petitioner entrusted the returned order under appeal to the present counsel who to his personal inconvenience could not follow up to file the appeal and in the process a delay of 574 days ensued. 2. Though notice was served on the respondent, he did not choose to file counter. 3. The point that arises for consideratio...
The President Aparna Heights-ii Owners Welfare Association and Another ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
Oral Order: (Mrs. M. Shreesha, Member) 1) This revision is preferred by the opposite parties against the order in IA No. 55/2013 in CC No. 59/2013 on the file of the Dist. Forum, Ranga Reddy. 2) The Dist. Forum in IA No. 55/2013 in CC No. 59/2013 directed the petitioners/Ops not to disconnect any of the services like electricity, water, and LPG/TV/net connection etc. to the flat of the respondent/complainant No. 812 at 8th floor of Aparna Heights-II until further orders. At the same time, the complainant shall pay the maintenance charges equally along with other flat owners. This interim order was given and notice was ordered against petitioners/Ops to appear by 15.3.2013. 3) The learned counsel for the petitioners/Ops contended that the Dist. Forum passed the interim order without issuing any notice and that the aggrieved person should approach the Grievance Cell, and that he is not a consumer. 4) The petitioner/Ops relied on the following two decisions of National Commission (i) K. R...
Peta Radha Reddy and Another Vs. C.V. Manoharan and Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.M.A.No.54 o01. 04.2013 Peta Radha Reddy and another C.V. Manoharan and others Counsel for the appellant: Sri Dammalapati Srinivas Counsel for respondent No.1: Sri K. Saikrishna Mohan Rao : : ?Citations: JUDGMENT : (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice LNR,J) The 1st respondent herein filed O.S.No.101 of 2011 in the Court of III Additional District Judge, Tirupati against the appellants and respondents 2 to 5 herein, for the relief of perpetual injunction in respect of the suit schedule property, a hotel at Srikalahasti, Chittoor District. He pleaded that the land on which the hotel was constructed was owned by the appellants and respondents 2 and 3, and his wife by name Saroja, and all of them gave the property on lease to M/s. Swarna Restaurant Private Limited, 4th respondent herein, under a document dated 17-04-2002. The 1st respondent further pleaded that the hotel was given on lease to him under a document dated 01-01-2005 ...
C.Ramulu. Vs. C.Anjaneyulu.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SAMUDRALA GOVINDARAJULU SECOND APPEAL No.626 o01. 04-2013 C.Ramulu. C.Anjaneyulu. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri Prabhakar Sripada Counsel for Respondent: Sri J.Azad Chandra Sekhar : ?Cases referred:1. (1994) 2 Supreme Court Case2. AIR 200.Supreme Court 2212 JUDGMENT: The plaintiff is the appellant herein. He filed the suit in the trial court for declaration of his ownership in the plaint schedule property and for delivery of possession of the same together with past and future mesne profits. The plaintiff's claim was opposed by the defendant. After trial, the trial court decreed the suit; and on appeal by the defendant, the lower appellate Court allowed the appeal. Hence, the plaintiff approached this Court with this second appeal. 2) At the time of admission of this second appeal, the then learned Judge of this High Court framed the following substantial question of law for determination in this second appeal: "Whether the appellate Court is justified in ...
Sri Vigneswara Traders,komerapudi Villag Vs. the Circle Inspector of P ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-01-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.9569 o01. 04.2013 Sri Vigneswara Traders,Komerapudi Village, Sattenapalli Mandal,Guntur District, rep. by its Proprietor-K. Gangadhara Reddy and another. The Circle Inspector of Police,Porumamilla Police Station,Kadapa District and two others. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri V. Sudhakar Reddy Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 & 2 : Assistant Government Pleader for Home Counsel for Respondent No.3: Assistant Government Pleader for Civil Supplies : ?Cases referred: Nil. The Court made the following: ORDER: This writ petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the action of respondent No.2 in seizing 40 bags of raw rice each weighing 50 kgs, 320 bags of raw rice each weighing 25 kgs and 40 bags of broken rice each weighing 50 kgs belonging to petitioner No.1 along with the lorry bearing registration not AP 0.TA 331.of petitioner No.2, as illegal and arbitrary. The petitioners also sought for a consequential direction to the responde...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Next ›