Andhra Pradesh Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
P. Somasundara Rao Vs. the Senior Manager Claims, Cholamandalam Ms Gen ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The unsuccessful complainant is the appellant. He filed the complaint claiming for accidental benefit of `1,00,000/-, compensation of `90,000/- and costs of `10,000/-. 2. The appellants father obtained insurance policy bearing number APG00000562-000-00 for the period from 11.01.2005 to 10.01.2006 from the respondent-insurance company. The appellants father, a businessman said to have left his home on 14.09.2005 to purchase furniture required for his business and while travelling in Pinakini express he stated to have fell down at Bitragunta Railway Station and died at the spot. The Railway Police, Bitragunta registered a case in crime number 79 of 2005 and the appellant stated to have identified cloths and photo of the person died in the accident as that of his father and the claim lodged by the appellant was repudiated on the grounds that there was discrepancy in regards to age, cloths worn and place of death of the dead person as regard...
1.Sarosh Sam Bastawala and Another Vs. State of A.P., Represented by A ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-04-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.PRAVEEN KUMAR Crl.P. No.634 of 2009 04-04-2014 1.Sarosh Sam Bastawala and another State of A.P., represented by Asifnagar Police Station, Hyderabad through Public Prosecutor, High Court of A,.P., Hyderabad, and others. Counsel for the petitioners: Petitioner No.2 appeared in person Counsel for the first respondent: Public Prosecutor 1. (2005) 3 SCC2992AIR2005SC7573 (2008) 9 SCC6774 (2012) 10 SCC3035(2003) 4 SCC6756(2008) 16 SCC17 (2012) 11 SCC321ORAL ORDER: This criminal petition is filed by A-1 and A-2 under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings in CC No.650/2002 on the file of VI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, City Criminal Courts, Hyderabad, which was taken on file for an offence punishable under Section 420 IPC. Originally, only the State represented by Public Prosecutor was made respondent. Subsequently, respondents 2 to 7 were impleaded as respondents pursuant to an order dt. 20-3- 2009 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1434/2009.2. The allegations in the...
Bhikam Chand Vs. C.Vittal Rao
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.6052 o03. 04-2013 Bhikam Chand C.Vittal Rao Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Vedula Srinivas Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Dhilip Kumar Shirodkar HEAD NOTE: ?CITATIONS: ORDER: The petitioner is the tenant of the respondent in respect of commercial premises at Osmangunj, Hyderabad. The respondent instituted proceedings under Section 4 of the A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 for fixation of fair rent of the premises. The Rent Controller fixed the fair rent for the premises at Rs.7,000/- per month. The petitioner, on the one hand, and the respondent, on the other hand, filed appeals before the appellate authority, not satisfied with the determination made by the Rent Controller. When the appeals were pending, the respondent filed O.S.No.2244 of 2009 in the Court of III Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, for eviction of the petitioner. The value of the suit was shown on the basis that ...
Smt. Rachokonda Parvathi W/O. Venkata Su Vs. Rachakonda Venkata Subrah ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 6034 OF 201.03-04-2013 Smt. Rachokonda Parvathi W/o. Venkata Subrahmanyam Rachakonda Venkata Subrahmanyam S/o.late R. Venkata Ramana. Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Ravi Cheemalapati Counsel for the Respondent: Sri G. Ram Gopal : ?Cases referred AIR 199.Rajasthan 63 ORDER: Petitioner is the wife of the respondent. Their marriage took place on 30-10- 1996 at Visakhapatnam. The respondent filed O.P. No.123 of 2000 in the Family Court, Visakhapatnam for divorce. The O.P. was decreed ex parte on 09-06-2000. She filed an application under Order - IX Rule 13 CPC with a prayer to set aside the ex parte decree. Since there was delay of 153 days in filing it, she filed I.A No.480 of 2006. In the affidavit filed in support of the I.A., she stated that her parents are from the State of Chattisgarh and when she joined the respondent after marriage at Visakhapatnam, she was subjected to harassment through demand of additional d...
M/S Dot Systems, Secunderabad and 2 OThe Vs. Union of India Rep. by It ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.9396 OF 201.03-04-2013 M/s DOT Systems, Secunderabad And 2 others Union of India rep. by its Foreign Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi and 5 others Counsel for the petitioners: Sri P. S. Rajasekhar Counsel for respondent: Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud Asst. Solicitor General Mrs. S. Nanda HEAD NOTE: ?Citations:1. (1994) 4 SCC 71.2) (1999) 9 SCC 2.3) (2010) 1 SCC 45.4) AIR 197.SC 33.5) 2007 (13) Scal6. (2004) 6 SCC 25.7) (2000) 7 SCC 64.8) (2007) 6 SCC 76.9) (1888) Vol.XXII QBD 12.10) AIR 196.SC 130.11) (1985) 3 SCC 21.12) 1994(6) SCC 32.13) (2006) 6 SCC 20.14) (1996)3 SCC 44.15) (1998)6 SCC 51.16) (2001) 2 SCC 29.17) (1977)1 SCC 79.18) 15 Ind Ap19. (2002) 1 SCC 56.20) (2008) 3 SCC 45.21) JT 200.(4) SC 47.JUDGMENT: The 1st petitioner is a proprietary concern located in Secunderabad, and is engaged in the business of providing software and hardware solutions in the education sector in India and abroad. Petitioners 2 and...
M/S. Ashok International Rep., by Its Ma Vs. State of A.P. and Others.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR C.M.A.Nos.126 of 2012 and Batch 03.04.2013 M/s. Ashok International rep., by its Managing Director. State of A.P. and others. Counsel for the Appellant: Sri V.L.N.G.K.Murthy Counsel for respondents: G.P. for Arbitration HEAD NOTE: Cases referred:1. AIR 198.SUPREME COURT 89 C.M.A.Nos.126, 127, 128, 207, 209 & 218 of 2012 And C.R.P.Nos.814, 815, 816, 1174, 1296 & 1307 of 2012 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per LNR,J) In this batch of C.M.As. and C.R.Ps., common questions of fact and law are involved. Hence, they are disposed of through a common judgment. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as "plaintiffs" and "defendants". The Government of Andhra Pradesh has initiated various steps for the development of Kakinada Port. Fairly large extent of land was identified for construction of godowns and for creation of other facilities around the Port. Many traders were granted l...
Agri Gold Farm Estate India Pvt.Ltd., Vi Vs. the State of Andhra Prade ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.G.SHANKAR A.S.NO.878, 884 of 2012 and W.P.No.16228 o03. 04-2013 Agri Gold Farm Estate India Pvt.Ltd., Vijayawada The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by the Special Secretary, Revenue Department, Hyderabad and others Counsel for the appellant: Sri S.Srinivas Reddy Counsel for respondent: Learned Government Pleader for Appeals : ?Citations: COMMON JUDGMENT: ( Per the Hon'ble Sri Justice L.Narasimha Reddy) These two appeals and the writ petition are filed by the same company and are in relation to the same land. Hence they are disposed of through a common Judgment. The appellant is a Private Limited Company, engaged in various activities, including business in real estate. It purchased an extent of about 290 acres of land in Jalli Pullala Cheruvu Village ,Racharla Mandal, Prakasham District, from various individuals. The respondents i.e. the Authorities of the Revenue Department, are said to have made an at...
Chintalapati Subramanya Sarma S/O. Late Vs. Yalavarthi Pushapavathi W/ ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-03-2013
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY SECOND APPEAL No.218 o03. 04-2013 Chintalapati Subramanya Sarma S/o. late Madusudhana Sarma and another Yalavarthi Pushapavathi W/o. Veeraiah Chowdary and another Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri J.Prabhakar Counsel for the Respondent: Sri N. Sriram Murthy : ?Cases referred: JUDGMENET: The dispute between the parties in the Second Appeal is a longstanding one and the appellants and their father were successful in keeping the respondents away from the suit schedule property, all along.2. The facts in brief that lead to filing of the Second Appeal are as under: The suit schedule property comprising of two items, was owned by one Smt. Karasani Pullamma. She gave the said property, together with a thatched shed thereon on lease, to one Sri Madhusudhana Sarma (for short 'Sarma'). The appellants and three others, by name, 1) Chinthalapati Dinakar, 2) Chinthalapati Chinni and 3) Chinthalapati Parvathamma are the children of Sarma. Pullamma died, leavi...
Dr.D.V.Prasad Vs. B.Murali Krishna and Two Others
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L. NARASIMHA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.5500 o02. 04-2013 Dr.D.V.Prasad B.Murali Krishna and two others Counsel for the petitioner : Sri R.K.Suri Counsel for the Respondents: Sri V.Srinivas : : ?Cases referred: Nil ORDER: It is on account of persons like the petitioner, that the people are losing faith in the judicial system and they are even preferring the anti-social elements to recover the amounts, than approaching the Courts.2. The 1st respondent filed O.S.No.813 of 1997 in the Court of the IV Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, against the petitioner and respondent Nos.2 and 3, for recovery of amount, referable to trade between them. The suit was decreed on 28.04.2004. Aggrieved by that, petitioner filed CCCA No.191 of 2004 before this Court. An order of interim stay of execution of the decree was passed on condition that the petitioner shall deposit 50% of the decreetal amount within the stipulated time. The condition was not complied wi...
Devisetty Ramaswamy Vs. the Chief Engineer, 400 Kv Line Ap Trans
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-02-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR W.P.NO.16017 OF 201.02-04-2013 Devisetty Ramaswamy The Chief Engineer, 400 KV Line AP Transco (APSPDCL), B-Block, Vidyuth Soudha, Hyderabad and others. HEAD NOTE: Counsel for appellants : Sri G.Krishna Murthy. Counsel for respondents : Sri O.Manohar Reddy. ?CASES REFERRED:1. 2007 (6) ALD 40.(DB) 2. AIR 197.SC 170.3. (2003) 3 SCC 47.4. AIR 200.ANDHRA PRADESH 158 1) 5. 2010(4) ALD 35.6. (2007) 6 SCC 79.7. (2008) 11 SCC 47.ORDER The petitioner, a resident of Sattenapally in Guntur District, owns an extent of Ac.4.46 cents in Sy.Nos.438 and 431/2 of Madala Village, Muppala Mandal, Guntur District. He states that he raises dry crops such as jute, chilly, cotton etc in these lands. The cause for grievance in this writ petition is that the Transmission Corporation of Andhra Pradesh Limited (APTRANSCO) proposed to erect a tower in his lands in the process of laying transmission lines from Nunna to Sattenapally. He issued legal notice dated 04.04.2012 to th...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »