Andhra Pradesh Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
B.Jaganmohan Reddy Vs. the Gram Panchayat Manikonda (V), Rep. B
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13082 and 13081 o26. 04.2013 Between: B.Jaganmohan Reddy..... Petitioner And The Gram Panchayat Manikonda (v), Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary, Rajendernagar Mandal, RR District and 2 others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Bajrang Singh Thakur Counsel for Respondent No.1: Sri P.Raghavendra Reddy : ?CITATIONS: COMMON ORDER: These two Writ Petitions have been filed apprehending demolition of the buildings constructed by the petitioners, over Plot Nos.9 and 3 in Survey Nos.195 and 196 of Manikonda Jagir Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, by respondent No.1. I have heard Sri Bajrang Singh Thakur, the learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri P.Raghavendra Reddy, the learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.1 in both the cases. The petitioners pleaded that they obtained building permissions for Ground + three upper floors, but, however, constructed one additional floor; and that in pursuance of G...
Soma Venkata Rao, S/O Chinna Rama Kottai Vs. Velamuri China Ayyapa Red ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.13024 o26. 04.2013 Between: Soma Venkata Rao, S/o Chinna Rama Kottaiah and two others...... Petitioners And Velamuri China Ayyapa Reddy,S/o Hanimi Reddy and eight others......Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri V.R.Machavaram Counsel for Respondent Nos.5 to 8: GP for Co-Operation : ?CITATIONS: NIL ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed for a Certiorari to quash O.P.No.20 of 2013 pending on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Co-Operative Tribunal, Vijayawada (for short 'the Tribunal') and declare that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to entertain the said O.P. as an election dispute. Petitioner Nos.1 to 3 were elected as President, Vice-President and Director, respectively, of the Gurajala Primary Agricultural Co-Operative Society (for short 'the society') in the recent elections. Respondent Nos.1 to 4, who are unsuccessful in the said elections, filed an Election Petition under Section 61(3) of the Andhra Pradesh Co-Operative So...
B. Sudhakar Reddy Vs. the S.H.O., Rgia, Cyberabad,shamshabad,
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION No.13577 OF 201.26-04-2013 B. Sudhakar Reddy The S.H.O., RGIA, Cyberabad,Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District and 4 others Counsel for the petitioner: Smt. Neeraja Sudhakar Reddy Counsel for respondent : G.P. for Home Sri M. Ramakanth, Sri Harinadh Nidamanuri HEAD NOTE: Citations:1. 1992(3) CRIMES 110 (SC) 2) (2008) 8 SCC 43.3) 2005(2) ALT (CRL) 401( AP) 4) 2000(3) SCC 55.5) (2009) 3 SCC 78.6) (1998) 5 SCC 74.7) (2006) 4 SCC 35.8) AIR 199.SC 60.9) (1987) 1 SCC 28.10) (2012) 1 SCC 47.11) AIR 196.SC 86.12) (2002) 3 SCC 8.13) (2000) 2 SCC 63.14) (1977) 2 SCC 69.15) (1992) 4 SCC 30.16) AIR 196.S17. (2008) 12 SCC 53.18) 1992 Crl.L.J....
The Superintending Engineer Operation, Apepdcl., Dasannapeta and Other ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
(Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President) Aggrieved by the order of C.C.No.122/2011 on the file of District Forum, Vizianagaram, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant No.1 is the father and complainant No.2 is the mother of the deceased Vemula Madhavi who died due to electrocution on 04-2-2010. It is their case that on 02-2-2010 their daughter got electrical shock due to short circuit of the entire house and the entire body was completely burnt due to the said short circuit and the house was also damaged. The complainants submitted that the above accident occurred only due to electrical short circuit and excess supply of electricity to their house was from the nearest transformer due to gross negligence of the opposite parties. The Police registered a case in Crime No.13/2011 U/s.174 Cr.P.C. and after the accident, post-mortem was conducted and the dead body was handed over to the family members of the deceased. Th...
Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corp Vs. Bondalapati Padma W/O. Su ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.SESHASAYANA REDDY Criminal Petition No.6113 o11. 09-2012 V.Suresh Reddy S/o Rosi Reddy, Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad E.Surya Prakash S/o Lakshman Goud and State Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s. Vinesh Raj Counsel for Respondent No.1: K.Sudhakar Counsel for Respondent No.2: Public Prosecutor : Cases referred:2010. CRIMES-4-50 2010-LAWS (BOM)-1-67 Crl. Petition No.376 of 2012 decided on 21.02.2012 Crl .Petition No.12066 of 2011 decided on 25.11.2011 (1999)7 SCC 51.ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been taken out under Section 482 Cr.P.C by petitioner-V.Suresh Reddy, accused in C.C.No.16 of 2010 on the file of Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kamalapuram, Kadapa District to quash the proceeding therein.2. 1st respondent-E.Surya Prakash Goud filed a complaint against the petitioner/accused in the Court of Junior Civil Judge-cum-Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kamalapuram alleging inter alia that the petitioner/accused borrowed an amount of R...
Smt. Dosali Appalanarasamma W/O. Late D. Vs. Smt. A.V. Swarnalatha W/O ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B.N. RAO NALLA C.M.A. No.2069 OF 200.25.04.2013 Smt. Dosali Appalanarasamma w/o. late D.Suri and five others Appellants Smt. A.V. Swarnalatha w/o. A. Narayana Murthy and another Respondents Counsel for the Appellants: Sri G. Ram Gopal Counsel for Respondent No.2:Sri B.Devanand GIST : HEAD NOTE : ?Cases referred :2009. ACJ 129.JUDGMENT: The petitioners in M.O.P. No.204 of 2000 on the file of the Motor Vehicles Accidents Claims Tribunal- cum- District Judge, Visakhapatnam assailing the impugned order dated 13th August,2003 filed this appeal seeking enhancement of compensation since they were awarded only Rs.1,20,360/- with proportionate costs and interest at 9% per annum from the date of the petition till realisation, though they claimed a total compensation of Rs.2,00,000/- for the death of deceased - Dosali Suri, who is husband of petitioner No.1 and father of petitioner Nos. 2 to 6.2. For the sake of convenience, the parties hereinafter referred to as they arrayed ...
Uppara Gangamma and OThe Vs. the Mandal Revenue Officer (Lao), Yemmig
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY CRP Nos.5803 o25. 04.2013 Uppara Gangamma and others ...Petitioners Vs. The Mandal Revenue Officer (LAO), Yemmiganur ...Respondent Counsel for the petitioners: Sri G.Venkata Reddy for Sri K.Rathanga Pani Reddy Counsel for respondent: Government Pleader for Arbitration : : ?Cases referred:1. 2002 LAWS (SC) 1-38 CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.5803 and 5805 of 2011 and 112, 115, 118, 119 and 120 of 2012 COMMON ORDER: This batch of civil revision petitions arises out of similar but separate orders dated 15.11.2011 in different I.As filed in different O.Ps. on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Adoni. The lands belonging to the petitioners were acquired by the respondent and as they were dissatisfied with the quantum of compensation awarded in their favour, they have approached the respondent with a request for reference of the dispute under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'). Accordingly, the dispute was refe...
D.Leelavathi and OThe Vs. the Director of Mines and Geology, Hyder
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO WP No.12441 o25. 04.2013 D.Leelavathi and others....PETITIONERS VERSUS The Director of Mines and Geology, Hyderabad and others.....RESPONDENTS Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri K.Rathanga Pani Reddy Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4: G.P. for Mines and Geology Counsel for the Respondents 5 and 6: Smt.N.Shoba. HEAD NOTE: Cases referred 1 Unreported decision dt.01-02-2001 in W.P.No.7430 of 2000 ORAL ORDER: In this writ petition, the petitioners challenge the orders dt.1.5.2010 of the 3rd respondent-District Collector, Kurnool District cancelling the Family Member Certificate granted in favour of petitioners by 4th respondent and consequential order dt.10.5.2010 passed by 2nd respondent revoking the proceedings No.7574/M4/99 dt.17-07-2002 declaring 1st petitioner as successor lessee of her late husband D.Siva Sankar Reddy.2. Heard Sri K. Rathanga Pani Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Government Pleader for Mines and Geology, ...
The Oriental Insurance Co.,ltd., Rep. by Its Regional Manager Vs. Jann ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
Oral Order: (R. Lakshminarasimha Rao, Member) 1. The opposite party is the appellant. The respondents filed complaint seeking for direction to the appellant to pay sum assured under insurance policy, Rs.50,000/- with interest, compensation and costs. 2. The respondents are the parents of J.Kumaraswamy who was a member of a society, Dandepalli Purshula Podupu Sangam. The society obtained Janata Personal Accident Group Insurance Policy from the appellant on 11.01.2007 for a sum of Rs.50,000/- to each of its members. As per the terms of insurance policy the sum assured would be paid in case of accidental death of member of the society. The son of the respondents died in motor vehicle accident on 15.01.2007.The respondents submitted claim along with criminal case records to the appellant . They got issued notice on 24.04.2009 calling upon the appellant to pay the amount assured under the insurance policy. 3. The case of the respondents is that on 15.01.2007 they along with their son were w...
A.P.Eastern Power Distribution Corporation Ltd., Rep. by the Addl.Asst ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
Decided on: Apr-25-2013
(Smt. M. Shreesha, Incharge President) Aggrieved by the order in C.C.No.82/2010 on the file of District Forum, Srikakulam, the opposite parties preferred this appeal. The brief facts as set out in the complaint are that the complainant is running a small Poultry farm in Gorlevanipeta Village, Gara Mandalam in Srikakulam District and eking her livelihood and has electrical power supply bearing SC No.691 under category-III and was using the power and paying the bills regularly to the opposite parties. The complainant submitted that on 08-4-2010 the service connection No.691 of the complainant was inspected by the Assistant Engineer, Operation, Ranasthalam and found that it was being used for commercial purpose for a connected load of 1710 W and found domestic load of 1660 W in the absence of the complainant. The complainant submitted that after the alleged inspection, she received a provisional Assessment Notice for Malpractice dated 16-4-2010 from the 2nd opposite party under category I...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »