The Kerala Public Men S Corruption Investigations And Inquiries Amendment Act 1992 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries amendment act 1992 Page 1 of about 305 results (2.028 seconds)Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Commit. and anr. Vs. C.K. Rajan and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : JT2003(7)SC312; 2003(3)KLT618(SC); 2003(6)SCALE401; (2003)7SCC546
..... situation arises therefore 71 the expression public men has been defined in kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries act 1987 the said definition includes ..... in nature indisputably the question as to whether an amendment is prospective or retrospective in nature will depend ..... certain information through their letters dated 21 9 1992 instead of sending any reply the management filed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamachandran Master Vs. Kerala Lok Ayukta
Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2006(4)KLT166
two kerala ministers in the matter of functioning of the kerala state warehousing corporation and also containing certain allegations about the in public life it also intended that the image of public functionaries should not be unnecessarily lowered in the eyes of or support the contents of his complaint in the manner mentioned in the format of the rules reproduced above and if thwart the object of the legislation which is to eradicate corruption and mal administration in public life 19 we have given of section 9 dealing with provisions related to complaints and investigations clearly mentions that such a complaint has to be in considered that the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries act 1987 in force in the state was not sufficient special rules 1999 unfilled vacancy that had arisen prior to amendment cannot be filled up by candidate not possessing amended qualifications contrary to the contrary we however find provisions in the act itself which would clearly indicate that whereas the object of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBenny T.D. and ors. Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies and anr.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1998SC2012; (1999)ILLJ527SC; 1998(3)SCALE392; (1998)5SCC269; [1998]3SCR147; 1998(1)LC747(SC)
dated 17 5 1995 is against the provisions of the kerala co operative societies act rules bye laws and directions and parties have been given a copy of the report of public inquiry commission on which report the registrar had relied upon given as is apparent from the report of kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission who has directed for is apparent from the report of kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission who has directed for a detailed so called report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission who had directed for a detailed enquiry violation of sub section 4 of section 80 of the act as well as rule 187 of the rules by both
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParmar Dipubhai B. and 10 ors. Vs. Registraqr of Co-operative Societie ...
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2006)2GLR1615
rule 176 and in the absence of report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made took into consideration the so called report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and inquiries commission who had directed order of registrar is very clear that nowhere it is mentioned under it that power is exercised under section 160 of the registrar has not made any allegations of mal practice corruption and that incompetent persons were selected and appointed by respondent of the society direct committee of the society pending the investigation and disposal of the matter to place or cause to report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and inquiries commission who had directed to a detailed inquiry and on refuse to register society and the bye laws and every amendment of such bye laws 2 to amalgamate divide or re by virtue of the power conferred on it by the act we shall not attempt to define a bye law or
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShital C. Joshi Vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : (2003)4GLR674
176 and in the absence of the report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made and in the absence of the report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made available ble supreme court in the case of national institute of mental health neuro sciences vs dr k kalyana raman ors reported the corporation thakore as well as the letter of anti corruption bureau for doing the needful and to send the report so called report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission who had directed for a detailed enquiry prescribed under rule 9 of the rules made under pndt act being a deficiency or inaccuracy in keeping record in the neuro sciences vs dr k kalyana raman ors reported in 1992 ii llj 616 in which on page 617 at para
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCourt on Its Own Motion Vs. Maneesh Chibber, Senior Correspondent, Hin ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : 2005CriLJ718
alleged contemner was to bring to the notice of the public at large rumours about alleged raids investigations no such intent the said bench passed the following order for the reasons mentioned in a separate note of even date let this matter the judge as a judge in other words imputing partiality corruption bias improper motives to a judge is scandalisation of the sought to dispel rumours about the conduct of cbi raids investigations directed at certain hon ble judges of the high court high court unfounded reports have been doing the rounds about inquiries and raids being conducted by central investigating agencies against judicial alienation because no reforms parallel to punjab as brought by amendment act of 1973 had been enacted although right to pre any court etc etc second is the doing of any act whatsoever which scandalises or tends to scandalise the authority of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCouncil of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Vs. P.C. Pa ...
Court : Gujarat
Reported in : [2003]129TAXMAN80(Guj)
this freedom have always been firmly repelled more so when public authorities have betrayed autocratic tendencies see paragraph 10 of the praise and honour this is the main reason why professional men have enjoyed prestige and honour but such a relationship can it is stated dishonesty has become a national habit and corruption has become a way of life we have developed a membership of the institute section 21 provides for the procedure inquiries elating the professional or other misconduct of members of the section 21 having regard to the scope of the said act would be conduct that is wrong improper unlawful or a life insurance corpn of india v prof manubhai d shah 1992 3scr595 was cited for the proposition that it was manifest
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Partap Singh Vs. the State of Punjab
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1963P& H298
or any post continue but only with regard to any public service or any post which continues to exist after the of the respondent in the gazette extraordinary in which specific mention of cancellation of leave was made and the petitioner has his wife sent a pamphlet with the title acts of corruption by shri partap singh kairon and his family to members the letter says i am directed to say that the investigations made by the vigilance department into certain complaints have revealed recruited or appointed before the constitution in the first place amendment of the old rules can be made under article 372 the governor of a province under the government of india act 1935 the second part of this definition does not apply
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.P. Jaiswal Vs. the State and anr.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Reported in : AIR1953P& H149
technical nature and the opinion of the prosecuting inspector and public prosecutor should therefore be obtained and if the prosecuting inspector this court this perhaps would be a proper stage to mention that on the 19th an application was made in court made to the police andsections157 gives the police power to investigate undersections159 a magistrate can on receiving a report under sections157 of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order rule absolute proceedings quashed sections 100 a as inserted by act 22 of 2002 110 104 letters patent 1865 clause 10
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandran Vs. State of Kerala
Court : Kerala
Reported in : 2005(4)KLT962
p c will prevail over the provisions contained in the kerala high court act 1959 she was examined to prove an on state brief and sri p m habeeb the learned public prosecutor for the respondent 9 the learned counsel appearing for in this case shows that the accused was suffering from mental illness but the learned sessions judge did not consider that p1 and registered ext pl a f i r further investigation of the case was conducted by p w 14 the 1908 section 100 a as substituted by c p c amendment act 2002 v k bali cj kurian joseph k balakrishnan prevail over the provisions contained in the kerala high court act 1959 she was examined to prove an extra judicial confession the position is made clear in sivamaniv state of kerala 1992 2 klt 227 this court after considering the various authorities
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT