The Kerala Public Men S Corruption Investigations And Inquiries Amendment Act 1992 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries amendment act 1992 Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 302 results (1.921 seconds)Ramachandran Master Vs. Kerala Lok Ayukta
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Sep-15-2006
Reported in : 2006(4)KLT166
2006 has been filed by sri g mohandas managing director kerala state warehousing corporation kochi it is the case of the it cannot be said with regard to everyone engaged in publication of news be it the papers magazines or other media frivolous and unfounded complaints government considered that the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries act 1987 in force in grievances of the people arising out of maladministration and fighting corruption at administrative and political levels the state of kerala was of the lok ayukta is made for the purpose of investigations and inquiries in accordance with the provisions of the act the person appointed under the act to conduct investigations and inquiries has necessarily to act under the provisions of the act special rules 1999 unfilled vacancy that had arisen prior to amendment cannot be filled up by candidate not possessing amended qualifications p1 is not a complaint under the provisions of the act of 1999 the kerala lok ayukta form and manner of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParmar Dipubhai B. and 10 ors. Vs. Registraqr of Co-operative Societie ...
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Feb-02-2006
Reported in : (2006)2GLR1615
rule 176 and in the absence of report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made body can do such things but body which is discharging public duties cannot be allowed to adopt such things in the into consideration the so called report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and inquiries commission who had directed to to law unless and until there is concrete evidence of corruption nepotism and favoritism as alleged no action whatsoever could be absence of report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made available to the bank or report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and inquiries commission who had directed to a detailed inquiry and on commencement of section 2 of the gujarat co operative societies amendment act 1981 6 of 1981 cease to be in force government while issuing notification under section 3 3 of the act therefore hearing authority is not registrar within the meaning of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Charan Biswal and Three ors.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Oct-25-2006
Reported in : 2007(1)OLR202
and rs 1 00 000 towards injury pain suffering and mental agony and accordingly directed for payment of compensation of rs of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order reduced appeal partly allowed sections 100 a as inserted by act 22 of 2002 110 104 letters patent 1865 clause 10
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnil Kumar Vs. Om Parkash and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-01-2006
Reported in : II(2007)ACC872; (2006)144PLR344
dr nagesh jain deposed that at the time of examination mendible of ashok kumar was found fractured there was traction injury pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause the section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order decree
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTiruvengadam @ Tiruvenkatam S/O Lakanadhan Vs. State of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jun-01-2006
Reported in : ILR2006KAR2739
having opened in the year 1969 evidently the provisions of amendment act 2005 would have no application to the facts of opened in the year 1969 evidently the provisions of amendment act 2005 would have no application to the facts of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPadagada Dam Division and anr. Vs. Ghana Swain
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Jul-24-2006
Reported in : 1(2007)ACC589
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause the in an appeal under section 30 of the w c act the appellate court can entertain an appeal only on substantial
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatyawan Son of Mir Singh Vs. Mahinder Singh Son of Daryav Singh and o ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-15-2006
Reported in : IV(2006)ACC129; 2007ACJ1396; (2006)143PLR155
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause the same is consequently dismissed sections 100 a as inserted by act 22 of 2002 110 104 letters patent 1865 clause 10
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatpal Singh Vs. State of Punjab and anr.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-01-2006
Reported in : 2006CriLJ3468
mitakshara coparcenary except in the manner and to the extent mentioned in sections 6 and 30 of the act this statement in respect of state of punjab by virtue of punjab amendment act 1973 there is a complete bar to contest any limited accordingly the punjab custom power to contest act 1920 act no 2 of 1920 was enacted the hindu succession act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRavinder and anr. Vs. Subhash Chand and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-25-2006
Reported in : 2007ACJ1365; (2006)143PLR108
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus application dated 3 4 2004 is annexure p l the amendment application was contested eventually the tribunal allowed the application the under article 227 of the constitution the provisions of the act are in the nature of a social security which provide
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Ashwinder Singh and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-24-2006
Reported in : 2007ACJ2250; AIR2006P& H209; (2006)143PLR318
to discharge the onus as laid down in the afore mentioned judgments cannot avoid its liability towards third party and therefore of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order of doubt that under section 149 2 ii of the act the disqualification of the driver or invalidity of driving licence
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT