The Kerala Public Men S Corruption Investigations And Inquiries Amendment Act 1992 - Judgment Search Results

Ramachandran Master Vs. Kerala Lok Ayukta

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2006(4)KLT166

entire procedure so far adopted by the learned lok ayukta kerala is wrong illegal without jurisdiction and highly arbitrary the other ayukta has initiated proceedings against the petitioner questions of substantial public importance regarding the jurisdiction of the lok ayukta to initiate explanatory note appended to the proforma under the schedule clearly mentions that the notification was issued to achieve the object of the state government considered that the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries act 1987 in force in the state of the lok ayukta is made for the purpose of investigations and inquiries in accordance with the provisions of the act reads as follows for the purpose of conducting investigations and inquiries in accordance with the provisions of this act the governor special rules 1999 unfilled vacancy that had arisen prior to amendment cannot be filled up by candidate not possessing amended qualifications inquiries has necessarily to act under the provisions of the act when the lok ayukta may act on a complaint received

Kader Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2005(1)KLT598

p c will prevail over the provisions contained in the kerala high court act 1959 1908 section 100 a as substituted by c p c amendment act 2002 v k bali cj kurian joseph k balakrishnan thereafter as provided under section 28 of the land acquisition act the review petition is allowed as above code of civil

New India Assurance Company Ltd. Vs. K.M. Cherian and anr.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : I(2007)ACC800

p c will prevail over the provisions contained in the kerala high court act 1959 1908 section 100 a as substituted by c p c amendment act 2002 v k bali cj kurian joseph k balakrishnan section 100 a as substituted by c p c amendment act 2002 v k bali cj kurian joseph k balakrishnan nair

Kamarban Beevi Vs. K.G. Radhakrishnan and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : I(1996)ACC488

p c will prevail over the provisions contained in the kerala high court act 1959 k p radhakrishna menon j 1 the petitioner in o p m v 804 1908 section 100 a as substituted by c p c amendment act 2002 v k bali cj kurian joseph k balakrishnan her application under section 110 a of the motor vehicles act for compensation stands dismissed by the judgment under challenge the

Mr.Syam Kiran, S/O.Prajnjan Vs. Mr.Lijo Joseph

Court : Kerala

this mfa is filed u s 173 1 of mv act against the judgment award dated 2 07 2008 passed in

United India Insurance Co.Ltd. Vs. S.Manikandan,s/O.Shanmughan

Court : Kerala

that is the old number before changing it into the kerala registration and it was also seen issued in the name the name of sri p j mathew it was an act only policy the period of the policy was from 11

Naser,s/O.Hamzakoya,chukante Purakkal Vs. Jijesh,s/O.Davadas,elambalak ...

Court : Kerala

this mfa is filed u s 173 1 of mv act against the judgment and award dated 05 05 2005 passed

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Joseph and ors.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : 2001ACJ2091; [2000(86)FLR64]; (2000)ILLJ1063Ker

in respect of the injury sustained by the workman is mentioned in section 4 of the act read with schedule iv the provisions in the act as it stood before the amendment 15 in the circumstances we set aside the impugned order not exclude liability for claims under the workmen s compensation act it is well settled that the insurer also will come

Girish Vs. Muthoot Capital Service (P) Ltd.

Court : Kerala

Reported in : III(2007)BC690; 2007(1)KLT16

p c will prevail over the provisions contained in the kerala high court act 1959 1908 section 100 a as substituted by c p c amendment act 2002 v k bali cj kurian joseph k balakrishnan the default sentence shall not be executed till that day action should not be taken to execute the sentence till the

A.V.J. Emporium Vs. Assistant Commissioner (Assessment), Commercial Ta ...

Court : Kerala

Reported in : (2009)24VST422(Ker)

p c will prevail over the provisions contained in the kerala high court act 1959 provided that the assessing authority may demand in form no 22 4 if any dealer executing works contract or any dealer in arrack claims deduction of any only one hundred and twenty per cent there was an amendment by way of exhibit pi erratum according to the petitioner his further case that tax under section 5 of the act has been paid as per returns there was no objection