The Kerala Public Men S Corruption Investigations And Inquiries Amendment Act 1992 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries amendment act 1992 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 305 results (2.275 seconds)Bowring Institute Vs. Mr. Sarwik S
Court : Karnataka
given while passing an order by the trial court except mentioning that perused the material on record the proviso order 39 in this judgment the apex court taken note of the amendment made to cpc in the year 1976 in the case an appeal under section 37 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 and also discussion was made with regard to filing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s Asset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Re ...
Court : Karnataka
bangalore represented by its district registrar 3 the principal secretary department of revenue bangalore 560 001 4 dr k senthilnathan proprietor guarantors even though arcil and iob s names have been mentioned in the said letter an order of impounding could not illegalities committed by sridevi dr senthilnathan smt devi and anti corruption council of india if the said documents were permitted to no 9193 of 2017 wp no 9578 of 2017 further action under section 37 the said letter is addressed to district
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCyient Ltd Vs. Karnataka State Electronics Development
Court : Karnataka
private limited company in the year 1991 subsequently became a public limited company in the year 1995 and consequently a certificate on the lessee not to change the name product as mentioned in the application admittedly the petitioner when the application was ltd a company incorporated under the provisions of the companies act 1956 and having its office at cyient it park 110a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Gaurav K Bhandari Vs. Mr. Bharath Chandrashekhar
Court : Karnataka
the caveator 11 3 section 148 a was introduced by amendment in the year 1977 providing the valuable right to a subsequently the proceedings under section 9 of the a c act in a a no 10 of 2021 came to be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBrindavan Hydropower Private Limited Vs. Union Of India
Court : Karnataka
this court in a p transco v sai renewable 2 kerala state electricity board v jhabua power limited ors in civil be guided by such directions in matters of policy involving public interest as the state government may give to it in 2 thereof confers the powers in respect of several matters mentioned thereunder 138 section 178 of the electricity act deals with was amended to widen the scope of private participation this amendment enabled the private sector to become generating companies amendments were the central commission section 86 1 e of the electricity act casts an obligation to promote co generation and generation of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr Mohankumar M Vs. State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
karnataka lokayukta m s building bengaluru 560001 represented by special public prosecutor karnataka lokayukta m s building bengaluru 560 001 respondent that his father is also a doctor and details are mentioned at page no 73 volume 24 of the charge sheet nor it amounts to an abetment under the prevention of corruption act 44 the trial court having considered the material available the apex court in the case of central bureau of investigation and another v thommandru hannah vijayalakshmi and another reported in its jurisdiction in exercise of the revisional jurisdiction and has acted beyond the scope of 227 239 of cr p c
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri. Chennakeshava Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
violators and those who are helping them while discharging their public duties would be brought to justice but in the common in the complaint disclose the offences under the special acts mentioned in g o no udd247mnu95dated 19 03 1996 and those 2023 with regard to jurisdiction to register the case and investigate the same 13 learned counsel for the petitioner referring these matter under section 192 a of the karnataka land revenue act 1964 and section 420 of ipc no doubt the apex
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs. X Vs. The State Of Karnataka
Court : Karnataka
use of the general public or customarily available to the public f the denial or discontinuation of or unfair treatment with attached the passport yes no size photographs enclosed documents as mentioned in the application declaration 1 i declare that the particulars requested to look into the transgender act and suggest appropriate amendments to the act of 1969 and the rules framed thereunder intent and mandate of the special laws namely the transgender act 29 nc 2024 khc 49110 wp no 55559 of 2017
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAsset Reconstruction Company (india) Limited Vs. The Senior Sub Regist ...
Court : Karnataka
bangalore represented by its district registrar 3 the principal secretary department of revenue bangalore 560 001 4 dr k senthilnathan proprietor guarantors even though arcil and iob s names have been mentioned in the said letter an order of impounding could not basis of a complaint by some organization by name anti corruption council of india the senior sub registrar has come to 9193 of 2017 wp no 9578 of 2017 financial institutions act 1993 and registered with the reserve bank of india under
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri.k. Lokesh Vs. The Bangalore District Maintenance And Welfare Of Pa ...
Court : Karnataka
the learned single judge is set aside to the extent mentioned accordingly writ appeal is disposed of sd n v anjaria for the court to take upon itself the task of amending or altering the statutory provisions 36 in dr baliram waman plain text 18 the language of section 16 of the act is plain clear and unambiguous this provision specifically and unequivocally
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT