Skip to content


The Kerala Public Men S Corruption Investigations And Inquiries Amendment Act 1992 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries amendment act 1992 Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 302 results (1.251 seconds)
Aug 14 2003 (SC)

Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Commit. and anr. Vs. C.K. Rajan and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2003(7)SC312; 2003(3)KLT618(SC); 2003(6)SCALE401; (2003)7SCC546

..... situation arises therefore 71 the expression public men has been defined in kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries act 1987 the said definition includes ..... in nature indisputably the question as to whether an amendment is prospective or retrospective in nature will depend ..... certain information through their letters dated 21 9 1992 instead of sending any reply the management filed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 04 1998 (SC)

Benny T.D. and ors. Vs. Registrar of Cooperative Societies and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC2012; (1999)ILLJ527SC; 1998(3)SCALE392; (1998)5SCC269; [1998]3SCR147; 1998(1)LC747(SC)

preferred special leave petition against the same judgment of the kerala high court but withdrew the same at the time of parties have been given a copy of the report of public inquiry commission on which report the registrar had relied upon on the basis of the report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission is concerned the learned the so called report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission who had directed for a detailed absence of report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made available to the bank or violation of sub section 4 of section 80 of the act as well as rule 187 of the rules and therefore

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 15 1982 (SC)

Manzoor Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1983SC295; 1983CriLJ441; 1982(1)SCALE407; (1982)2SCC72

july 1951 so far as it relates to the health department which shall henceforth be direct under my charge until further deceased could not have been in a fit medical and mental state to make such a detailed and long statement at rejected the dying declaration ex p 11 recorded by the investigating officer p w 12 at the hospital on the ground or to any municipal officer the machinery provided in the act must be followed in enforcing its provisions and it is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 05 1998 (SC)

Kochu Maitheen Kannu Salim Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1998IIIAD(SC)294; AIR1998SC2852; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)610; 1998CriLJ2277; 1998(2)Crimes1(SC); JT1998(2)SC559; 1998(2)SCALE371; 1998(1)LC732(SC)

it becomes difficult to appreciate how the evidence of the investigating officer pw 20 could have made the discovery evidence reliable vested in the gram panchayat established under punjab gram panchayat act 1953 iii the ownership was therefore transferred to another body

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 02 1973 (SC)

Neti Sreeramulu Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC2551; (1974)3SCC314; [1973]3SCR844

sessions judge but under the provisions of the law above mentioned it is for the high court to come to an below had completely ignored the effect o f the recent amendment of section 357 cr p c and that they have and the procedure laid down by ch xvii of the act and any orders passed by them either in rem or

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 23 1984 (SC)

O.P. Kathpalia Vs. Lakhmir Singh (Dead) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1984SC1744; 1984(2)SCALE65; (1984)4SCC66; 1984(16)LC890(SC)

was also contended that a suitable reply stating the afore mentioned facts to the notice served by the landlord was sent be argued that the rule was repealed because of the amendment of the section 344 f h 346 f h the case of any premises let after the commencement of this act within six months from the date on which it is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 31 1998 (SC)

State of Punjab Vs. Bhola Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1998SC1983; 1998(1)ALD(Cri)867; 1998(2)ALT(Cri)69; 1998CriLJ2836; 1998(2)Crimes263(SC); JT1998(3)SC286; 1998(3)SCALE161

price with reference to an ordinary dealer and the govern ment is a discount to the government the position that there correct to say that no attempt was made by the investigating officer to find out whether any independent witnesses had seen 4 4 d ii of new s 4 of the act 862f g the assessment of excise duty both in relation

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 1992 (SC)

Kailash Vs. State U.P

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC470; 1994CriLJ142; 1994Supp(3)SCC146

and functions in respect of seven departments including the health department the second order was passed on december 20 1949 by municipality of howrah can only be filed by the authorities mentioned therein and not by an ordinary citizen section 537 of haemorrhage according to the prosecution on 15th may 1973 the investigating officer came to know that the accused had approached p and not by an ordinary citizen section 537 of the act provides that the commissioners may institute defend or withdraw from

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 30 1992 (SC)

Balkar Singh and Others Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC1133

even the weapon in ram singh s hand is not mentioned what kind of injuries and on what part of the section 34 without taking into consideration whether any specific overt act is proved against the appellant ram singh therefore this is

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 01 1998 (SC)

V. Karnal Durai Vs. the District Collector, TuticorIn and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 1999(1)CTC21; (1999)1MLJ94(SC); 1998(6)SCALE350; (1999)1SCC475; [1998]Supp3SCR206

was less than the upset price as estimated by the department the appellant preferred an appeal to the director of geology 3 1997 which stated that if by the date of amendment the lease application had been processed the amendment would not between a small quantity and a commercial quantity held amending act cannot be applied with retrospective effect question of infliction of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //