The Kerala Public Men S Corruption Investigations And Inquiries Amendment Act 1992 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries amendment act 1992 Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.716 seconds)Shital C. Joshi Vs. Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Jan-21-2002
Reported in : (2003)4GLR674
176 and in the absence of the report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made action of the corporation is fully justified in the larger public interest and therefore also this petition is not required to the corporation the qualification for the post of conductor was mentioned it was further contended that after receiving the names from the so called report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission who had directed for a detailed of the report of the kerala public men s corruption investigation and enquiries commission being made available to the bank or the provisions of section 5 or 6 of the pndt act and has to be treated and tried accordingly it does neuro sciences vs dr k kalyana raman ors reported in 1992 ii llj 616 in which on page 617 at para
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Anguri Devi Vs. Moti Ram and ors.
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Aug-01-2002
Reported in : AIR2003P& H200
as described be modified to the extent that the mortgages mentioned in the sale deed would stand at least till such alienation because no reforms parallel to punjab as brought by amendment act of 1973 had been enacted although right to pre the same if jwala had died before the hindu succession act 1956 was enacted the three sons would have taken the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRamesh Chandra Mohapatra and anr. Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Feb-27-2002
Reported in : 2002CriLJ3453; 2002(I)OLR408
be established against the petitioners for any of the offences mentioned in the impugned order accordingly the impugned order is quashed of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order under a special act sections 100 a as inserted by act 22 of 2002 104 dr b s chauhan cj l
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBranch Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohan Chandra Patn ...
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Sep-27-2002
Reported in : I(2003)ACC12; 2004ACJ382; 2003(I)OLR86
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause the section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order decree
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sanjulata Mallik and ors.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Nov-21-2002
Reported in : 2003(I)OLR229
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order decree
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Kumudini Nayak and ors.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Apr-26-2002
Reported in : 95(2003)CLT684
2 the deceased was a government servant employed in the department of information education and communication centres health education bureau directorate policy number as well as the other particulars are clearly mentioned in the said policy the insurance policy available on record pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause the learned counsel for the appellant is that the court below acted illegally in saddling the entire amount of compensation i e
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Insurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Prema and ors.
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Apr-16-2002
Reported in : II(2002)ACC671; ILR2002KAR2490; 2002(5)KarLJ307
no memorandum of deposit of title deeds in view of amendment act no 7 of 2006 to article 6 of schedule against the quantum of compensation in such an eventuality the act enables the insurer to contest it on all grounds available
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPramatha Kumar Mishra Vs. Board of Secondary Education and anr.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Feb-12-2002
Reported in : 2002(I)OLR361
the roll number of the petitioner but it does not mention anything under the column details of incriminating materials seized it of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order under a special act sections 100 a as inserted by act 22 of 2002 104 dr b s chauhan cj l
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnilkumar Vs. Shammy
Court : Kerala
Decided on : Oct-25-2002
Reported in : II(2003)BC466; [2003]116CompCas82(Ker); II(2003)DMC632
p c will prevail over the provisions contained in the kerala high court act 1959 documentary evidence clearly shows that ext for execution of the modified sentence hereby imposed needless to mention the learned magistrate shall be at liberty to initiate proceedings law is put into operation what was prior to the amendment of the negotiable instruments act in 1988 only a moral he is sentenced under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act to under go simple imprisonment for a period of one
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Public Prosecutor Vs. Mahadi Thirupathi Reddy and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Sep-04-2002
Reported in : AIR2002SC3128; 2002(2)ALD(Cri)564; 2002(2)ALT(Cri)287; 2002CriLJ4119; 2002(4)Crimes181(SC); JT2002(6)SC444; 2002(6)SCALE196; (2002)7SCC36
as inserted by amending act of 2002 13 m p public service commission services promotion rules 2002 rule 1 a k rules neither the 77th constitutional amendment nor the 85th constitutional amendment had been made retrospective from 1985 and at that time article 16 4a as inserted by constitution seventy seventh amendment act 1995 promotion with consequential seniority held where by virtue of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT