The Kerala Public Men S Corruption Investigations And Inquiries Amendment Act 1992 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: the kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries amendment act 1992 Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.802 seconds)Guruvayur Devaswom Managing Commit. and anr. Vs. C.K. Rajan and ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Aug-14-2003
Reported in : JT2003(7)SC312; 2003(3)KLT618(SC); 2003(6)SCALE401; (2003)7SCC546
..... situation arises therefore 71 the expression public men has been defined in kerala public men s corruption investigations and inquiries act 1987 the said definition includes ..... in nature indisputably the question as to whether an amendment is prospective or retrospective in nature will depend ..... certain information through their letters dated 21 9 1992 instead of sending any reply the management filed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Divisional Manager, Representing United India Insurance Co. Ltd. V ...
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Mar-07-2003
Reported in : 2003(I)OLR413
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order insurance in terms of section 95 2 of the old act which was in force before the commencement of the new
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGram Panchayat Balad Kalan Vs. the Joint Development Commissioner and ...
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : May-14-2003
Reported in : (2003)134PLR747
mitakshara coparcenary except in the manner and to the extent mentioned in sections 6 and 30 of the act this statement 7 was inserted in act of 1920 by the punjab amendment act of 1973 right of contest being contrary to custom can only be decided in a suit filed under the act before the collector in view of the said findings the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Girija Vs. K. Vinay
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Jul-18-2003
Reported in : 2005(1)ALD(Cri)2; I(2004)BC345; ILR2003KAR3252
the firm 11 at this stage it is necessary to mention to the elementary principle of law that the duty of negotiable instrument act 1881 central act no 26 of 881 amendment and miscellaneous provisions act 2002 act no 55 of 2002 accused revision petitioner under section 138 of the negotiable instrument act questioning the legality and propriety of the order impugned 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDivisional Manager, United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gokula Moharan ...
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Mar-07-2003
Reported in : 2004ACJ1893
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause the period of four months after the commencement of the new act or till the date of expiry of such a policy
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Gokula Moharana and anr.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Mar-07-2003
Reported in : I(2005)ACC498
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus pertinent to note that section 100 a introduced by 2002 amendment of the code starts with a non obstante clause the though issued before coming into force of the motor vehicles act 1988 on 1 7 1989 referred to motor vehicles act
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMehar Dass Son of Puran Mal, Vs. State of Haryana
Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-15-2003
Reported in : 2003CriLJ2203
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus shukla assistance chemicalexaminer and pw10 si mam chand who was investigatingofficer and other formal witnesses after the conclusionof the prosecution evidence of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order hadever mal treated aforesaid pataso or had ever committedany such act which had forced the deceased to commitsuicide on that basis
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUinited India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Manorama Das and ors.
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Sep-16-2003
Reported in : 3(2005)ACC40
rs 500 the monthly average salary of the deceased therefore works out to rs 4 325 i e rs 3 825 overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order the bar created by section 64 vb of the insurance act the appellant an authorised insurer issued a policy of insurance
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatyananda Sahu Alias Kuna Vs. State of Orissa
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Sep-12-2003
Reported in : 2003(II)OLR438
witness during trial violation of any of the conditions above mentioned entails cancellation of bail granted to him the learned trial of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order decree
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Smt. P. Kamala, W/O Late P. Bh ...
Court : Orissa
Decided on : Jun-20-2003
Reported in : II(2004)ACC174; 2003(II)OLR167
overriding effect in the case of a conflict with laws mentioned with the non obstante clause the legislative intention is thus of section 110a in the c p c by 2002 amendment act no letters patent appeal is maintainable against judgment order an appeal under section 30 of the workmen s compensation act 1923 challenging the judgment dated 25 7 01 passed by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT