Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-17-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID FRIDAY,THE17H DAY OF JANUARY201427TH POUSHA, 1935 WA.No. 1309 of 2011 ----------------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 29152/2009, DATED0306-2011 ------------ APPELLANT(S)/PETITIONERS IN THE WP: ----------------------------------------------------------- 1. RADHAKRISHNA PILLAI.K., ATTENDANT, KERALA LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT BOARD LTD, MUDAVOOR PO, MUVATTUPUZHA , ERNAKULAM.2. RAJENDRAN. U, DO..DO..3. SANIL KUMAR M.S, ATTENDANT, MATTUPETTY INDO SWISS PROJECT, KLD BOARD, MATTUPETTY, IDUKKI DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.N.SUGATHAN RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS IN THE WP: --------------------------------------------------------------- 1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM695001 .2. KERALA LIVESTOCK DEVELOPMENT BOARD LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, GOK...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-03-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY,THE3D DAY OF FEBRUARY201414TH MAGHA, 1935 WA.No. 173 of 2014 () IN WP(C).4157/2008 ------------------------------------------------------------------- AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 4157/2008 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED0411-2011 APPELLANT(S)/RESPONDENTS1TO6IN THE WRIT PETITION: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVT. (FINANCE) THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.2. HIGHER EDUCATION SECRETARY, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.3. THE DIRECTOR OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.4. THE DIRECTOR OF TREASURIES, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.5. THE JOINT DIRECTOR, REGIONAL DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE.6. THE DISTRICT TREASURY OFFICER, PALAKKAD. BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S)/PETITIONERS AND7H ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-06-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE6H DAY OF FEBRUARY201417TH MAGHA, 1935 Bail Appl..No. 862 of 2014 ------------------------------------ [CRIME NO. 111/2014 OF THE PAVARATTY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT] ........... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: ------------------------------------ 1. P.A.YOUSAF, S/O.LATE ABDUL RAHMAN HAJI,AGED58YEARS, PANIKKAVEETTIL HOUSE, VENKITANGU VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK.2. AMINAKUTTY, W/O.YOUSAF,AGED52YEARS, PANIKKAVEETTIL HOUSE, VENKITANGU VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK.3. NABEEL, S/O.YOUSAF, AGED30YEARS, PANIKKAVEETTIL HOUSE, VENKITANGU VILLAGE, CHAVAKKAD TALUK. BY ADVS.SRI.T.H.ABDUL AZEEZ, SMT.UMMUL FIDA. RESPONDENTS: ------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. SREEJITH. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON0602-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Prv. THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J -----...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-11-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 11.02.2014 1. Civil Writ Petition No.9823 of 2002 Chidambram and otheRs...Petitioners Versus Union Territory, Chd. and others ..Respondents 2. Civil Writ Petition No.9931 of 2002 Raju ..Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chd. and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, CHIEF JUSTICE. HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE ARUN PALLI1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?. 2. Whether to be referred to the Reporters or not ?. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present : Mr.Ashok Kumar Nabhewala, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Ms.Liza Gill, Advocate, for U.T.Administration, Chd. In CWP No.9823 of 2002. Ms.Alka Chatrath, Advocate for U.T.Administration, Chd. In CWP No.9931 of 2002. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) There are six petitions which raise a common question being the present two petitions and Civil Writ Petitions No.4739, 4799, 4772 and 4773 of 200...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Feb-04-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SATHEESACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE4H DAY OF FEBRUARY201415TH MAGHA, 1935 AS.No. 296 of 2002 ( ) ----------------------- AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS11581995 of II ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM ======================= APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS:: ------------------------------------------ 1. SOUDAMINI, AGED51YEARS, W/O. LATE VENUGOPALAN RESIDING AT SHINY NIVAS, (PALLICKAPARAMBIL) ALAPPATT ROAD, RAVIPURAM, KOCHI.2. P.V.SHINY, D/O. LATE VENUGOPALAN AGED23YEARS, SHINY NIVAS (PALLICKAPARAMBIL) ALAPPATT ROAD, RAVIPURAM, KOCHI. BY ADV. SRI.T.RAJESH RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS:: ------------------------------------------- 1. VISAMBHARAN, AGED59 NOBIL VIHAR EDAPPALLY TOLL, THRIKKAKARA NORTH, KOCHI-24.2. MRS.NIRMALA ULLASKUMAR D/O. LATE RAMAN, AGED39 WARRIAM VEEDU NAMBIAPURAM ROAD, PALLURUTHI. R1 & R2 BY ADVS. SRI.C.K.ARAVINDAKSHA MENON SRI.MVS.NAMBOOTHIRY SRI.KUMARASWAMY SARMA K.N. SRI.PRAKASH P.GEORGE THIS APPEAL SUITS HAVING...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-29-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h January, 2014 + CRL.A. 393/1998 SOHAN LAL @SURESH @ SODA ..... Appellant Through: Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate versus STATE Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Sunil Sharma, APP % CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HONBLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT : SUNITA GUPTA, J.1. This appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 14th August, 1998 and 17th August, 1998 in Sessions Case No.82/1997 arising out of FIR No.484/1997 u/s 302/34 IPC registered with PS Seelampur whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 302 IPC and was sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and pay a fine of Rs.25000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 36 months. In case of deposit of fine, an amount of Rs.20,000/- is to be paid to the father of the deceased while the remaining amount shall go the State as cost of the proceedings.2. The facts and circumstances giving ris...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-12-2014
CWP No.2632 of 2014 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.2632 of 2014 Date of decision: 12.02.2014 Smt. Kamlesh Kumari ...Petitioner(s) Versus The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court, Panipat and another ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE G.S.SANDHAWALIA Present: Mr.Pawan Kumar Hooda, Advocate, for the petitioner. G.S.SANDHAWALIA, J. The present writ petition has been filed challenging the award dated 05.07.2013 (Annexure P-1).whereby, the Labour Court, Panipat has declined the reference of the petitioner-worklady on the ground that she had left her service out of her own sweet will and did not report for duty despite issuance of several letteRs.Accordingly, it was held that the management has been able to prove that the worklady had remained absent from duty and left the job on her own will. A perusal of the award would go on to show that the grievance of the petitioner-worklady was that she had joined duty as Operator Assembly on ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-18-2014
Criminal Misc.No.M-44299 of 2013 {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Misc.No.M-44299 of 2013 Date of Decision: 18th February, 2014 Pawender Partap Singh & Anr.Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI Present: Mr.H.N.S.Gill, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Nitin Kaushal, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Nipun Vashist, Advocate, for the complainant. *** Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J. Prayer in this petition is for grant of anticipatory bail to petitioneRs.Pawender Partap Singh and Kesar Singh who have been booked for having committed the offence punishable under Section 365, IPC, in a case arising out of FIR No.446, dated 09.11.2013, registered at Police Station, Dharuhera, District Rewari. Learned counsel contends that the petitioners were not named in the FIR and the aggrieved person, namely, Nepal Singh had stated to the police at Kotputli that he was not kidnapped by any body and was proceedings towards Kotputli on his own...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-19-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No.384/1998 Reserved on:13. h January, 2014 Date of Decision:19. h February, 2014 % OM PARKASH @ RAM KIRPAL Through ..... Appellant Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha, Advocate. Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Rajat Katyal, Additional Public Prosecutor. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J: Om Prakash, the appellant stands convicted under Sections 302 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC for short) by the impugned judgment dated 30th May, 1998 arising out of FIR No.217/1991, police station Dabri. By order on sentence dated 30th May, 1998, the appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.500/- for the offence under Section 302 IPC. In default of payment of fine, he has to undergo Simple Imprisonment for 15 days. For the offence under Section 324 IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to Rigorous Imprisonment for one year. The sentences were to run concurr...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-30-2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE30H DAYOF JANUARY201410TH MAGHA, 1935 Crl.MC.No. 938 of 2014 -------------------------- CRL.MP.NO. 132/2012 OF CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE COURT, PALAKKAD DATED0301-2014 ..... PETITIONER(S):1ST RESPONDENT: ----------------------------------------------------- JAFFAR, S/O.UMMER K.T, KURUPPAM THODIYI HOUSE, MELE PATTAMBI P.O.679 303, PALAKKAD DISTRICT (PROPRIETOR, BISMI TRADING COMPANY, 2/36B, PERINTHALMANNA ROAD, SANKARAMANGALAM, PATTAMBI). BY ADVS.SRI.K.G.BALASUBRAMANIAN SMT.AMBILY PREMKUMAR RESPONDENT/PETITIONER: ------------------------------------------ 1. THE DHANALAKSHMI BANK LIMITED., REPRESENTED BY ITS PATTAMBI BRANCH, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER, SUNIL K., ASSOCIATE VICE PRESIDENT (LAW), DHANALAKSHMI BUILDINGS, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR682001.2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.K.RAJEEV THIS ...
Tag this Judgment!