Model Penal Code Test - Judgment Search Results

Brother John Antony Vs. the State

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1992CriLJ1352

must be strictly construed and that no act should be penalised unless it clearly falls within the ambit of the penal an unnatural offence under section 377 of the indian penal code while so holding learned judge had the occasion to explain affect the fundamental principles of interpretation namely that the primary test is the language employed in the act and when the

Tej Singh Vs. State (Delhi Administration)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 43(1991)DLT318

guilty of cheating punishable under section 417 of the indian penal code i accordingly hold him guilty under section 417 of under section 417 468 and 471 of the indian penal code and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year on who has since died to the same effect is the testimony of public witness 5 shri sri ram sharma principal of

Sultania Kanjar Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1990(1)WLN113

sultania has been convicted for the offence under section 302 ipc and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment 2 briefly stated the by the court1 this criminal appeal is directed against judgment dated 30 1 1980 of the police that before the accused is subjected to a test identification parade it will take every pre caution to see

Prakash Chandra and ors. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1991CriLJ2566; 1990WLN(UC)99

not surrender to their bail bonds and they are discharged penal code sections 302 307 341 147 148 149 and 324 surrender to their bail bonds and they are discharged penal code sections 302 307 341 147 148 149 and 324 prosecution not be shaken there is hardly anything to discredit his testimony from the perusal of the statement of these witnesses it

Phula Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1990(2)WLN208

is not deposited he shall undergo ri for three months penal code section 302 amp 326 death due to complication and not deposited he shall undergo ri for three months penal code section 302 amp 326 death due to complication and mish

Taylor Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

or one of the broader generic definitions articulated in the model penal code and in a predecessor statute to 924 e usage approximates that adopted by the drafters of the model penal code a person is guilty of burglary if he enters no 98 190 p 5 1983 s rep u s code cong admin news 1984 p 3182 the house report quoted wyden id at 49 53 statement of mr castille the testimony of mr knapp focused specifically on whether the enhancement provision

Labh Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC83b; 1990(1)Crimes461(SC); JT1990(1)SC102; 1990(1)SCALE95; 1990Supp(1)SCC20

sections 148 450 326 307 324 and 323 of indian penal code 1860 appellants convicted and fined to rs 2000 each dismissed fine amount imposed under sections 326 and 149 of code of 1860 reduced rs 1000 each in default to suffer

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1991SC101; (1991)1CompLJ1(SC); JT1990(3)SC725; 1991LabIC91; (1991)ILLJ395SC; 1991Supp(1)SCC600; [1990]Supp1SCR142; 1991(1)SLJ56(SC)

..... to the constitutional validity of section 124a of the indian penal code two views were before this court with regard to the ambit of ..... sector under and as a part of the said act model standing orders are set out and standing order no 13 provides ..... classification for the purposes of legislation thus to pass the test of permissible classification two conditions must be fulfilled namely that i .....

ishwarsinh M. Rajput Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1990)2GLR1365

jail manual committee as also the objects mentioned in the model prison manual these objects are i to enable the inmate assigned congenial jobs sense and sympathy are not enemies of penal asylums 61 the treatment of prisoners should emphasize not their that case validity of section 433a of the criminal procedure code which was inserted in 1978 was challenged section 433a reads

K. Venkataramana Reddy Vs. A. Radha and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1991CriLJ498

view of the provisions of s 79 of the indian penal code many cases may however arise where in acting under force used in arresting the person section 49 of the code mandates that no person shall be subjected to more restraint narhar rao 1966crilj1495 it is categorically laid down that the test to determine as to whether a particular act complained of