Model Penal Code Test - Judgment Search Results

Sri Nanjaiah Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2002CriLJ3289

285 386 and 352 read with sections 34 and 149 ipc 2 petitioner is the father of one dr n shiva 12 6 2000 for an appropriate action in terms of criminal law as applicable to this case 4 petitioner also says above set of questions this was confirmed during the repeat test 11 the asst director of forensic psychology division forensic science

Modern Terry Towels Ltd. Vs. Gujarat Electricity Board and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR2003Guj63; (2003)4GLR354

deemed to have committed theft within the meaning of indian penal code while the later portion enacts a rule of evidence to have committed theft within the meaning of indian penal code while the later portion enacts a rule of evidence by respondent board had wrapped and removed that meter for laboratory test further more the load test also had been carried out

Norang Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2002(10)SC422

liberty at once the appeals are allowed accordingly criminal indian penal code section 34 302 323 out of 4 accused 2 at once the appeals are allowed accordingly criminal indian penal code section 34 302 323 out of 4 accused 2 charge

State of A.P. Vs. T. Prasanna Kumar

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2002(7)SC635

punishable under part ii of section 304 of the indian penal code while acquitting the other respondents we hold birabar mania of the exceptions of section 300 of the indian penal code as already noticed in this case there is no evidence

N.D.M.C. and anr. Vs. Mohd. Shamim and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [2003(97)FLR155]; (2003)IILLJ81Del

of permanent employee as contained in rule 1b of the model standing orders the respondent no 2 herein was a permanent case under section 379 380 and 411 of the indian penal code hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as under section 379 380 and 411 of the indian penal code hereinafter for the sake of brevity referred to as i

Dhulaji Bhikhaji Khant Vs. State of Gujarat

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 2002CriLJ4827

for the offence charged against him undersection 302 of the penal code 21 learned advocate for the appellant cited adecision of the statement of the appellant under section 313 of the code of criminal procedure vide judgment andorder dated 21st december 1994 supporting the prosecution case but however onbare reading of this testimony of daughter jashoda it isclear that she never understood the

Mohar and anr. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2002SC3279; 2002CriLJ4310; JT2002(7)SC393; 2002(6)SCALE516; (2002)7SCC606

302 and 323 read with section 34 of ipc indian penal code 1890 sections 300 304 part i s b sinha and 323 read with section 34 of ipc indian penal code 1890 sections 300 304 part i s b sinha dr reversing the acquittal of theaccused on appeal 302304 criminal murder testimony of injured eye witnesses fact that the witness sustained injuries

Shambhu Paul and ors. Vs. State of Assam

Court: Guwahati

the same meaning as in section 304b of the indian penal code this section provides that if soon before the death same meaning as in section 304b of the indian penal code this section provides that if soon before the death of opinion was only on the basis of vague and inconsistent testimony of those interested witnesses i e mother brother and particularly

State of U.P. Vs. Ramesh Chandra Verma and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

of acquittal the accused persons were charged under sections 148 ipc 332 149 ipc 307 149 ipc 323 149 ipc and ipc 307 149 ipc 323 149 ipc and 395 397 ipc and the learned sessions judge thought it prudent to sentence per the list supplied by the inspector incharge 2 the test identification parade also was not in accordance with the law

Asit Kumar Sahu Vs. State of Orissa

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 95(2003)CLT648; 2003(I)OLR306

holding the petitioner guilty of offences under section 324 indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act 1959 and the petitioner guilty of offences under section 324 indian penal code and section 27 of the arms act 1959 and sentencing of the accused in court only in absence of any test identification parade is of no avail since otherwise p w