Skip to content


Labh Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
SubjectCriminal
CourtSupreme Court of India
Decided On
Case NumberCriminal Appeal No. 431 of 1984
Judge
Reported inAIR1976SC83b; 1990(1)Crimes461(SC); JT1990(1)SC102; 1990(1)SCALE95; 1990Supp(1)SCC20
AppellantLabh Singh and ors.
RespondentState of Punjab
Excerpt:
.....each in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months - half of amount of fine already deposited to be refunded to appellants. - karnataka value added tax act, 2003.[k.a. no. 32/2004]. section 1: [ s.b. sinha & h.s. bedi, jj] concept & scope held, charges paid towards evolution of prototype conceptual design, on which service tax is leviable, cannot be taxed under value added tax act. payments of service tax as also the vat are mutually exclusive. therefore, they should be held to be applicable having regard to the respective parameters of service tax and the sales tax as envisaged in a composite contract as contradistinguished from an indivisible contract. in the instant case the appellant is an advertising agency. it provides for advertisement services. it..........should run concurrently and that a sum of rs. 2,000/- be paid as compensation to the victim jaspal singh (pw-3) out of the fine amount, if realised, preferred an appeal before the high court of punjab & haryana, which for the reasons assigned in its judgment set aside the conviction of all the appellants under section 307 read with section 149 of i.p.c. but confirmed the convictions of all the appellants in respect of the remaining offences. coming to the question of sentence, the high court reduced the sentences of imprisonment to the period already undergone by the appellants under each count but enhanced the fine amount to rs. 2,ooo/- in respect of each of the appellants for the conviction under sections 326 and 326 read with section 149 i.p.c. with the usual default clause and.....
Judgment:

S. Ratnavel Pandian, J.

1. In this appeal, all the ten appellants who stood convicted under Sections 148, 450, 326, 307, 324 and 323 read with Section 149 I.P.C. and sentenced to various terms of imprisonment in addition to the imposition of fine amount with the usual default clause with a direction that all the substantive sentences should run concurrently and that a sum of Rs. 2,000/- be paid as compensation to the victim Jaspal Singh (PW-3) out of the fine amount, if realised, preferred an appeal before the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, which for the reasons assigned in its judgment set aside the conviction of all the appellants under Section 307 read with Section 149 of I.P.C. but confirmed the convictions of all the appellants in respect of the remaining offences. Coming to the question of sentence, the High Court reduced the sentences Of imprisonment to the period already undergone by the appellants under each count but enhanced the fine amount to Rs. 2,ooo/- in respect of each of the appellants for the conviction under Sections 326 and 326 read with Section 149 I.P.C. with the usual default clause and directed half of the fine amount, if realised, 'shall be paid to Jaspal Singh (PW-3) and the remaining half to the other injured PWs, namely, Balwant Singh (PW-6) and Barbara Singh (PW-7) in equal proportion.'

2. It is seen that at the time of granting leave to appeal, this Court was informed that the entire fine amount of Rs. 20,000/- imposed on all the appellants has already been deposited in this Court.

3. After hearing the learned counsel for both the parties and carefully going through the entire records, wo hold that there is no substance in this appeal and accordingly the appeal is dismissed. However, while confirming the judgment of the High Court, we reduce the fine amount of Rs. 2,000/- imposed on each of the appellants under Section 326 and 326 read with Section 149 of I.P.C. to Rs. 1,000/- in default to seller rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months. Out of the amount stated to have been depositedin this Court, half of the amount i.e. Rs. 10,000/- is directed to be refunded to the appellants and out of the balance fine amount of Rs. 10,000/- a sum of Rs. 5,000/- shall be paid to Jaspal Singh (PW-3) and the remaining half i.e. Rs. 5,000/- to the injured persons, namely, Balwant Singh (PW-6) and Darbara Singh (PW-7) in equal proportion.

4. Subject to the above modification, the criminal appeal is dismissed.


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //