Model Penal Code Test - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: model penal code test Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 6,519 results (0.396 seconds)Awadh Kishore Sahu Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-25-2016
302 34 as well as 376 g of the indian penal code and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years 34 as well as 376 g of the indian penal code and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for significance in view of the testimony of p w 1 testifying that she had been taken to police station where she
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMumtaz @ Muntyaz Vs. State of U.P.(Now Uttarkhand)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-01-2016
under section 302 read with section 34 of the indian penal code for short the ipc passed in sessions trial no section 302 read with section 34 of the indian penal code for short the ipc passed in sessions trial no 15 the cumulative effect is that the dying declaration fails the test of credibility 2 the prosecution case and the dying declaration
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArun Kumar Verma Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-25-2016
302 34 as well as 376 g of the indian penal code and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years 34 as well as 376 g of the indian penal code and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for by p w 1 becomes meaningless in view of the testimony recorded at paragraphs 41 and 61 where she has testified
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjay Kumar Gupta ? Chhotu ? Ajay Soni Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-25-2016
302 34 as well as 376 g of the indian penal code and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for the offence under section 394 of the indian penal code 2 the case of the prosecution is that in intervening shambhu kumar verma happens to be a magistrate who conducted test identification parade during which p w 1 p w 3
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBhola Kachhap Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-25-2016
39 of 2000 registered under section 395 of the indian penal code had confessed about their involvement and therefore were taken 34 as well as 376 g of the indian penal code and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 10 years for worth acceptable it is true that p w 1 has testified in paragraph 24 that she had been taken to police
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s.Visal Lubetech Corporation and Another Vs. The Additional Commissi ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Sep-30-2016
the duty with proposal to confiscation the goods and imposed penalty the petitioner has submitted their objection and an opportunity of that as the motor vehicles act is a self contained code and itself provides for a forum for appeal revision the 08 2014 among the six samples two samples covered under test memos no 1 3 2014 15 ciu and 1 2
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMansing and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, (Copy to be served on ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Jun-09-2016
..... petitioners under section 420 read with section 34 of the indian penal code the order of the trial court refusing to issue process ..... after being satisfied the complainant owner selected the said vehicle model and completed the formalities of purchasing the same since the ..... in their showroom and which was available for inspection and test drive to the complainant 12 shri dhorde further submits that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudhir Khanna and Others Vs. The State, Rep. By the Inspector of Polic ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Apr-07-2016
whether the petitioners are liable for prosecution under any other penal provisions and who are the persons to be held liable the said decision 8 jurisdiction under section 482 of the code has to be exercised with a great care in exercise
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPradeep Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Jun-28-2016
liberty forthwith if not required in any other case indian penal code 1860 section 302 201 evidence act 1872 section 25 forthwith if not required in any other case indian penal code 1860 section 302 201 evidence act 1872 section 25 106
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohamed Farid Jafer Shaikh Vs. The State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-29-2016
for offence under section 363 r w 34 of the ipc the appellant was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three the offence under section 452 r w 34 of the ipc the appellant was sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three this witness so as to cause us to disbelieve her testimony moreover her room is situated two rooms away from the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial