Model Penal Code Test - Judgment Search Results

Waqf Masjid Hauz Wali Vs. Arun and Others</B>

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1999(2)AWC1196

in section 29 he shall be liable to pay such penalty not exceeding rupees fifty for the firstcontravention and rupees two 1 the plaintiff appellant filed suit no 636 of 1992before civil judge muzaffarnagar alleging that waqf in respect of mosque hauz

Rajesh Bajaj Vs. State Nct of Delhi and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1999SC1216; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)760; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)301; 1999CriLJ1833; 1999(1)Crimes136(SC); 1999(2)CTC243; JT1999(2)SC112; 1999(I)OLR(SC)668; RLW1999(3)SC452; 1999(1)SCALE6; [1999]3SCC259; [1999]2JTSC112

..... of any offence of cheating punishable under section 420 of the indian penal code second is that there is nothing in the complaint to suggest ..... managing director of m s avren junge mode gumbh haus der model approached the complainant for purchase of readymade garments of various kinds ..... judges found that the case on hand could not pass the test laid down by this court in state of haryana v bhajan .....

Harinder Singh and ors. Vs. State and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999VAD(Delhi)687; 81(1999)DLT809; I(2000)DMC38; 1999(51)DRJ310

for quashing of fir no 577 u s 406 498a ipc and also has no claim right or lien on the be dismissed 6 consequently the petition is dismissed criminal procedure code 1973 section 482 quashing of proceedings dispute between the parties

Lachhman Alias Kalloo and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1999CriLJ3391

was further charged of the r hence under section 302 ipc simplicitor and a11 other accused persons namely natthi chhafar munna judge who charged accused munna and murari under section 147 ipc accused lachhman alias kallo natthi and chhatar were charged under

Kota Peda Nagesh Vs. State of A.P.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(2)ALD383; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)519; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)364; 1999CriLJ2051

for the offences under sections 302 447 324 and 323 ipc we see no reasons as to why the trial court refunded to the appellant criminal prejudiced accused section 161 of code of criminal procedure 1973 denial to provide statements of direct

S. Vs. E.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1999)2GLR1814

has been made offence under section 497 of the indian penal code the said provision does not envisage prosecution of the in the proceedings under section 498a of the indian penal code 12 it is in the aforesaid background that the prayer divorce was legal and valid whereas the 1st respondent has testified to the fact that she was made to believe not

Shamnsaheb M. Multtani Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2001ALLMR(Cri)997(SC); (2001)2SCC577

them the husband under section 304 b of the indian penal code and awarded the maximum sentence of life imprisonment prescribed appeal became one of right under section 379 of the code of criminal procedure for short ldquo the code rdquo and code it can be discerned from the context that the test of minor offence is not merely that the prescribed punishment

Kalinder Bharik Vs. State of H.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2000SC3618

is liable to be convicted under section 302 of indian penal code when the post mortem examination wasconducted on 7 11 liable to be convicted under section 302 of indian penal code when the post mortem examination wasconducted on 7 11 95 weapons were found stained with human blood when they were tested in the chemical laboratory 4 the above circumstances are sufficient

Holloway Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

intent element re 11 section 2 02 6 of the model penal code provides requirement of purpose satisfied if purpose is element re 11 section 2 02 6 of the model penal code provides requirement of purpose satisfied if purpose is conditional re 11 section 2 02 6 of the model penal code provides requirement of purpose satisfied if purpose is conditional when of the car or i ll shoot app 51 another testified that he said give me your keys or i will

Shripatrao Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1999(2)ALD(Cri)481; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)439; 1999CriLJ5002; II(1999)DMC605SC; JT1999(6)SC264; 1999(5)SCALE206; 1999(2)LC1389(SC)

is dismissed criminal conviction sections 302 and 498a of indian penal code 1860 appeal against conviction under sections 302 and 498a dismissed criminal conviction sections 302 and 498a of indian penal code 1860 appeal against conviction under sections 302 and 498a dying