Model Penal Code Test - Judgment Search Results

Ginzburg Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that publication footnote 12 schwartz morals offenses and the model penal code 63 col l rev 669 677 1963 footnote ..... 14 the proposed official draft of the ali model penal code likewise recognizes the question of pandering as relevant ..... test cf dombrowski v pfister 380 u s 479 380 u s 486 487 380 u s 491 492 such behavior is central to the objectives of criminal obscenity laws ali model penal code .....

Ahmed and anr. Vs. the State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1967Raj190; 1967CriLJ1053

of the forms relating to section 379 of the indian penal code the language is that you on or about the person as given in section 11 of the indian penal code is not exhaustive and must be taken to include an

MishkIn Vs. New York

Court: US Supreme Court

..... groups footnote 9 for a similar scienter requirement see model penal code 251 4 2 commentary model penal code tentative draft no 6 1957 14 49 51 ..... public at large the prurient appeal requirement of the roth test is satisfied if the dominant theme of the material taken ..... inadequacy of the most susceptible person facet of the hicklin test no substantial claim is made that the books depicting sexually .....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Shobharam and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1966SC1910; 1966CriLJ1521; 1966MhLJ913(SC); [1966]SuppSCR239

the offence of criminal trespass punishable under s 447 indian penal code the act however places a limitation on the powers created by the code is punishable with imprisonment but the code by s 340 entitles an accused person to be defended 1953 s c r 254 referred to quaere whether the tests of an arrest laid down in ajaib singh s case

Osborn Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... wechsler jones korn the treatment of inchoate crimes in the model penal code of the american law institute attempt solicitation and conspiracy ..... entered homes to obtain evidence footnote 2 6 polygraph tests of government employees and of employees in industry are ..... rights of the senate committee on the judiciary psychological tests and constitutional rights 89th cong 1st sess 1965 footnote .....

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. the Metal Corporation of India Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC637; [1967]1CompCas37(SC); [1967]1SCR255

be laid if plea of false implication is raised indian penal code 1890 sections 300 149 deceased alleged to have been laid if plea of false implication is raised indian penal code 1890 sections 300 149 deceased alleged to have been assaulted just in the context of public acquisitions and that that test was satisfied in the present case 6 mr m c

Electrical Manufacturing Co. Ltd. Vs. D.D. Bhargava

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1967Delhi41; 1967CriLJ868

8 dia one herborn high efficiency continuous wire drawing machine model tf 11b 15 drafts suitable to draw aluminum wire from a complaint under section 120b read with section 420 indian penal code and section 5 of the imports and exports control of calcutta under sections 439 and 561 a of the code of criminal procedure and under article 227 of the constitution

Barada Kanta Misra Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: (1967)ILLJ663Ori

as follows started a criminal case under 8 341 indian penal code against the level creasing gate keeper and stationmaster of was started by the petitioner under section 341 indian penal code against the assistant stationmaster and gate keeper jaipur road railway in the rank of subordinate judge if he satisfied that test it is true that as a result thereof the petitioner

Tamizhazhagan and anr. Vs. the Revenue Divisional Officer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1966)2MLJ194

sacred books will not come within the purview of the penal statute in our opinion placing such a restricted interpretation on public servant an offence under section 182 of the penal code involved moral turpitude and so disentitled a person to get reasonable classification for purposes of legislation and the only two tests that classification has to stand are i that the classification

State of U.P. Vs. Neel Kanth and anr.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1967All447; 1967CriLJ1250

the accused were charged under sections 309 and 402 indian penal code they and their companions were alleged to have collected them bothunder sections 399 and 402 of the indian penal code and sentence them each to undergo rigorous imprisonment for five that evidence and the safe rule is that the sworn testimony of witnesses in court as to the identity of the