Model Penal Code Test - Judgment Search Results

Smith Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... thinking on this subject in the proposed model penal code of the american law institute see a l i model penal code tentative draft no 6 1957 207 10 ..... people we cannot afford to relax that standard for the test that suppresses a cheap tract today can suppress a literary gem ..... yet my view is in the minority and rather fluid tests of obscenity prevail which require judges to read condemned literature and .....

Hira Pearelal Kirar Vs. the State

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960MP11; 1960CriLJ78

and thus you committed an offence under section 307 indian penal code which is triable by the court of sessions it thus you committed an offence under section 307 indian penal code which is triable by the court of sessions it is

Pemmasani Venkatachalapati Rao and ors. Vs. V. Govindarajulu, Revenue ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960AP300

commission of a non cognisable offence under section 352 indian penal code the sub inspector also served a notice on the these petitions under sections 439 and 561 a criminal procedure code respectively are directed against the order dated 26 8 1958

Pemmasani Venkatachalapati Rao and ors. Vs. Govindarajulu, Revenue Ins ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1960CriLJ782

criminal procedure code of an offence under section 353 indian penal code said to have been committed by the first petitioner clearly disclosed offences under sections 353 and 355 indian penal code suryaprakasam the learned counsel for the petitioners contended that the

The State Vs. Sohan Lal

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1960Raj44; 1960CriLJ278

offence under section 408 and 2 section 477a of the penal code on 29 12 1953 on the next following day under section 408 and 2 section 477a of the penal code on 29 12 1953 on the next following day the

Gajraj Singh Bheru Singh Rajput Vs. State of M.B. and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960MP299

be paid by the applicant to the opposite party indian penal code 1890 section 306 dalveer bhandari harjit singh bedi jj 1958 sc 36 supra is as it were a complete code in this regard 16 the result is that the administration event is entitled to the benefit of article 311 the test is not whether the employment is provisional or temporary but

Durga Dass Sohanlal and ors. Vs. the State

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1960P& H271; 1960CriLJ646

jagadhri town he went to his house which is in model colony yamuna nagar he said that durga das and chaman with the aid of the provisions of section 149 indian penal code the courts have to scrutinise with anxious care whether was also a third charge under s 436 indian penal code but they were not found guilty under it 5 originally front of the police post 35 i cannot accept the testimony of d w 4 joshi when he stated that out

Peyyeti Jagannadha Rao and anr. Vs. Pamarti Venkateswara Rao and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960AP49

..... a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 penal code the learned judge also adverted to the fact that the tribunal ..... industrial tribunal and found that the whole procedure adopted is modelled on the code of civil procedure reference was also made to section 11 ..... civil court 4 we do not think that any of these tests propounded by sri narasimham are decisive in the matter the very .....

In Re: Siram Reddi Simhachalam

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1960AP253; 1960CriLJ561

show whether the two high schools in question viz the model high school and the hitkarini high school at jubbalpore were to rigorous imprisonment for six months under section 420 indian penal code the sentences being ordered to run concurrently the conviction rigorous imprisonment for six months under section 420 indian penal code the sentences being ordered to run concurrently the conviction under

Ram Chander Vs. the State

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: 1960CriLJ651

p w 3 a dry cleaner carried on business in model town karnal in the adjoining shops and resided in jamna convicted was 324 and not s 307 of the indian penal code he added that s 307 provides in terms for in an ancillary proceeding amended section 100 a of the code clearly stipulates that where any appeal from an original or