Interrupting - Judgment Search Results

Jagdish Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC1010; 1979CriLJ888; (1979)2SCC178; [1979]3SCR428; 1979(11)LC493(SC)

..... to return the mere fact that letters were written expressing such an intention would not interrupt the desertion from continuing bipin chander laisinghbhai shah v prabhawati 1956 s c r 838 ..... 2 that the appellant s letter of april 1 1955 did not con stitute an interruption of the respondent s desertion by its being a just cause for her to remain .....

State of U.P. Vs. Gopi and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1979CriLJ1121; 1960Supp(1)SCC160; 1979(11)LC437(SC)

..... two activities being so in tegrated that the connection between the two cannot be voluntarily interrupted without a breach of the contract or the compulsion arising from the nature of the .....

The New Swadeshi Mills of Ahmedabad Ltd. Vs. the State of Gujarat and ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1980Guj119; (1980)0GLR177

..... remain the same whether the original owner bharatkhand textile resumed or recommenced production after an interruption of nine months or whether a purchaser namely the plaintiff company did so nothing turns ..... and claim exemption it would make little difference whether the same owner resumes production after interruption or some other concern does so it is therefore difficult to comprehend how the .....

Artabandhu Mohapatra and ors. Vs. Bisweswar Bhutia and ors.

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR1979Ori110; 47(1979)CLT420

..... decree for declaration of title and recovery of possession would not interrupt the running of time it stands on the same footing as ..... the court that adverse possession set up by the defendants was interrupted by the decree of 1931 the court observed it may be ..... on me that mere decree of possession by civil courts do not interrupt running of adverse possession in other words if passing a declaratory .....

Ranchhodbhai Jorabhai Vs. Bai Rai D/O Patel Karsanbhai Gulab and W/O R ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1979)2GLR575

..... if execution of a decree is ordered but owing to some interruption not attributable to the decree holder himself the order for ..... cannot be carried out and subsequently on the removal of the interruption the decree holder applies to carry out the previous order for ..... cannot be carried out and subsequently on the removal of the interruption the decree holder applies to carry out the previous order for .....

Palli Pentayya Naidu Vs. Sirisetti Somaraju and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1980AP98

..... not allow any adjournment of the proceedings except when proceedings are interrupted of obstructed by riot or affray or by causes beyond ..... not allow any adjournment of the preceding except when proceedings are interrupted or obstructed by riot or affray or by causes beyond ..... allow any adjournment of the proceedings except when they are interrupted or obstructed by riot or affray or by causes beyond .....

Kathirath Velu Vs. State of Kerala and anr.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1980Ker25

..... in interest or himself continued in possession of the property without interruption whether as a mortgagee with possession or otherwise from the ..... force on the 1st day of november 1956 explanation ii an interruption for a period not exceeding an agricultural year immediately following ..... of the tenancy shall not be deemed to be an interruption for the purposes of clause c a similar provision with .....

Gannett Co., Inc. Vs. Depasquale

Court: US Supreme Court

..... would result from giving publicity to such previous inquiry bayley j interrupting i believe that in that case a distinction was taken between ..... in my mind all the difference emphasis in original parke j interrupting the decision in cox v coleridge turned upon its being a ..... room in the place for that purpose provided they do not interrupt the proceedings and provided there is no specific reason why they .....

Sarjeet Singh Bhangul Vs. Bar and Council of Delhi ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: ILR1979Delhi263; 1979RLR324

..... after the date of enrolment of an advocate may be affected by interruption of practice at the bar such interruption would not be known merely from the date of enrolment it is .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Srinivasa Perumal Bank Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1981]131ITR692(Mad)

..... dissolved and the business was taken over by one of the partners there was no interruption in the services of the employees or alteration in the terms of their employment in ..... a liability which was to arise in future as the employees continued in service without interruption 16 another unreported decision dated march 6 1979 in the case of cit v salem .....