Skip to content


Interrupting - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: interrupting Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 114 results (0.01 seconds)
Sep 14 1995 (HC)

Arumugam and anr. Vs. Sri. Dharmapuram Mutt

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-14-1995

Reported in: 1996(1)CTC90

orderraju j 1 the above second appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree of the learned subordinate judge...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1995 (HC)

Rampur Distillery and Chemicals Co. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-03-1995

Reported in: 1995IAD(Delhi)425; 57(1995)DLT642; 1995(32)DRJ733; (1995)110PLR28

r c lahoti j 1 the court in deciding the question of court fee should look into the allegations in...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 06 1995 (SC)

Laxmi Chand and Others Vs. Gram Panchayat, Kararia and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-06-1995

Reported in: AIR1996SC523; JT1995(8)SC195; 1995(6)SCALE351; (1996)7SCC218; [1995]Supp4SCR774

..... to return the mere fact that letters were written expressing such an intention would not interrupt the desertion from continuing bipin chander laisinghbhai shah v prabhawati 1956 s c r 838 ..... 2 that the appellant s letter of april 1 1955 did not con stitute an interruption of the respondent s desertion by its being a just cause for her to remain .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1995 (HC)

Sree Ranga Enterprises Vs. Rainbow Cosmetics Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-05-1995

Reported in: ILR1995KAR533; 1995(6)KarLJ577

..... s r bannurmath k ramanna jj parole question whether parole extended to the detenue would interrupt the period of detention held the period spent under parole will not count as a ..... would stand automatically extended even if a person is on parole normally parole will not interrupt the period of detention however if the rules or even the order of parole indicates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 16 1995 (HC)

Rangadas Naik Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Aug-16-1995

Reported in: 1997ACJ1392; ILR1996KAR975; 1996(2)KarLJ191

..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 30 1995 (SC)

Smt. Kamalabai Jageshwar Joshi and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-30-1995

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)139; AIR1996SC981; JT1995(9)SC127; 1995(6)SCALE764; (1996)1SCC669; [1995]Supp6SCR8

..... two activities being so in tegrated that the connection between the two cannot be voluntarily interrupted without a breach of the contract or the compulsion arising from the nature of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 30 1995 (HC)

In Re : B.K. Sharma

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jan-30-1995

Reported in: 1995CriLJ3057

..... 2 c of the contempt of courts act 1972 in relevance to that allegation of interruption of work the allegation was during the strike of bar association and was done by .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 07 1995 (SC)

Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Municipal Corporation and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-07-1995

Reported in: AIR1995SC1480; JT1995(3)SC626; (1995)2MLJ35(SC); (1995)4SCC96; [1995]3SCR246; 1995(2)LC384(SC)

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place municipal corporation delhi 1985 152itr388 sc accordingly it proceeded on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 02 1995 (SC)

Pt. Rishikesh and anr. Vs. Salma Begum (Smt)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-02-1995

Reported in: JT1995(4)SC401; 1995(3)SCALE354; (1995)4SCC718; [1995]3SCR1062

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place act 37 72 brought on statute rule 5 of order 15 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 1995 (SC)

Suresh H. Rajput Etc. Vs. Bhartiben Pravinbhai Soni and Others Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-28-1995

Reported in: 1996IAD(SC)74; AIR1996SC2883; 1996(1)ALD(Cri)828; 1996CriLJ1621; JT1995(9)SC210; 1995(7)SCALE217; (1996)7SCC199; [1995]Supp5SCR747

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place 5 a reading of section 20 1 clearly indicates that before .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //