Skip to content


Interrupting - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: interrupting Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 144 results (0.007 seconds)
Feb 23 2001 (SC)

Tek Chand and ors. Vs. Deep Chand and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-23-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC1392; RLW2001(2)SC302; 2001(2)SCALE204; (2001)4SCC488; 2001(1)LC579(SC)

..... to return the mere fact that letters were written expressing such an intention would not interrupt the desertion from continuing bipin chander laisinghbhai shah v prabhawati 1956 s c r 838 ..... 2 that the appellant s letter of april 1 1955 did not con stitute an interruption of the respondent s desertion by its being a just cause for her to remain .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 2001 (HC)

Krishtappa Vs. Ananta Kalappa Jaratakhane and Another

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-16-2001

Reported in: AIR2001Kant322; ILR2001KAR5239

..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 2001 (HC)

Nagaraj and Another Vs. Ammayamma

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jun-29-2001

Reported in: I(2002)DMC439; ILR2001KAR4004; 2001(5)KarLJ516

..... s r bannurmath k ramanna jj parole question whether parole extended to the detenue would interrupt the period of detention held the period spent under parole will not count as a ..... would stand automatically extended even if a person is on parole normally parole will not interrupt the period of detention however if the rules or even the order of parole indicates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2001 (SC)

N.S.S. Narayana Sarma and ors. Vs. Goldstone Exports (P) Ltd. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-23-2001

Reported in: AIR2002SC251; 2002(1)ALLMR(SC)634; 2002(1)ALT17(SC); [2002(1)JCR207(SC)]; JT2001(10)SC13; (2002)3PLR552; 2001(8)SCALE269; (2002)1SCC662

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place the appellants approached the high court in appeal but were unsuccessful .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 2001 (HC)

Mohd. Ishaq and Others Vs. D.D.A. and Others

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-04-2001

Reported in: 2002(61)DRJ699

..... acquisition act 1894 section 4 notification issued wayback in 1959 plea of continuous and un interrupted possession of land for decades taken in writ petition petitioner didn t challenge the notification .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 17 2001 (SC)

Daya Singh Lahoria Etc. Vs. Union of India and ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-17-2001

Reported in: AIR2001SC1716; 2001(1)ALD(Cri)828; 2001(2)ALT(Cri)142; 2001CriLJ2188; JT2001(5)SC31; 2001(3)SCALE370; (2001)4SCC516; [2001]3SCR1; 2001(2)LC1002(SC)

..... two activities being so in tegrated that the connection between the two cannot be voluntarily interrupted without a breach of the contract or the compulsion arising from the nature of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 09 2001 (HC)

Kayathi Jayapal Reddy Vs. State Election Commission and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Oct-09-2001

Reported in: 2001(6)ALD136; 2001(5)ALT587

..... the declaration of the results the direction sought for by the petitioner is not for interrupting obstructing or protracting the election proceedings in any manner nor the petitioner challenges the ..... observed in preceding paragraphs elsewhere the petitioner is not seeking any relief to stall or interrupt or protract the election proceedings the dispute raised by the petitioner in my considered .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 06 2001 (HC)

State Election Commissioner Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Apr-06-2001

..... and directed for preparation of the supplementary voters lists as that will amount to interrupting delaying or postponing the process of election he further submitted that the main grievance ..... the election process has started to decide the question which has the effect of interrupting obstructing and protracting election proceedings however judicial intervention is available of assistance pf the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 08 2001 (HC)

Tekchand and ors. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-08-2001

Reported in: (2001)IILLJ1700P& H

..... services of the employees who fulfil the prescribed conditions if an interruption occurs on account of the action of the employer or ..... following observations in anand kumar s case likewise if an interruption in service is due to sickness or authorized leave or ..... of the expression continuous service used in section 25b excludes interruption of service on account of sickness or authorized leave or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 20 2001 (HC)

Anil Shankarrao Zade Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Aug-20-2001

Reported in: 2002(1)MhLj592

..... general concept of parole has laid down that parole does not interrupt the period of detention and thus that period needs to be ..... a temporary fixed period to meet certain situations it does no interrupt the period of detention and thus needs to be counted towards ..... 30 the constitution bench has again reiterated that parole does not interrupt the period of detention and thus needs to be counted towards .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //