Interrupting - Judgment Search Results

Standard Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Bombay City

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC595; [1967]63ITR470(SC); [1967]1SCR768

..... to return the mere fact that letters were written expressing such an intention would not interrupt the desertion from continuing bipin chander laisinghbhai shah v prabhawati 1956 s c r 838 ..... 2 that the appellant s letter of april 1 1955 did not con stitute an interruption of the respondent s desertion by its being a just cause for her to remain .....

Bihta Co-operative Development Cane Marketing Union Ltd., and anr. Vs. ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC389; [1967]37CompCas98(SC); [1967]1SCR848

..... two activities being so in tegrated that the connection between the two cannot be voluntarily interrupted without a breach of the contract or the compulsion arising from the nature of the .....

London and Thames Haven Oil Wharves Ltd. Vs. Attwooll (inspector of Ta ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1968]70ITR460(Cal)

..... done in the course of the business nevertheless compensation for such interruption or suspension may fall to be treated a trade receipt ..... to incur expenses in repairing the physical damage but also an interruption in the profitable use of the jetty both these consequences ..... fire policies to cover themselves against loss of profit due to interruption of their business by fire upon a fire occurring the .....

United States Vs. Utah Construction and Mining Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the contract excluding profit necessarily caused by the unreasonable period of such suspension delay or interruption and the contract shall be modified in writing accordingly no adjustment shall be made to ..... asserted in writing as soon as practicable after the termination of such suspension delay or interruption but not later than the date of final payment under the contract any dispute concerning .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay City-ii Vs. Bombay Hing Supply Co.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1966]61ITR672(Bom)

..... any change the continuity of business has not in any manner been interrupted the business has been carried on in the name of the ..... a going concern the business of the old firm continued without any interruption the business was carried on the same premises with the same customers ..... identity of the business is not in and manner broken or interrupted but on the other hand the business as a whole is .....

Advocate-general of Madras Vs. Sri Amanullakhan, Advocate

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1966)2MLJ219

..... magisterial clerk and generally conducted himself in such an undignified and disorderly manner as to interrupt the proceedings the respondent is then supposed to have uttered some words which the ..... according to the learned government pleader this certainly constitutes contempt of court and not mere interruption of court and insult to the officer which would be a separate offence punishable .....

Advocate General of Madras Vs. Amanullakhan, Advocate, Salem 1

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1967Mad162; 1967CriLJ551

..... magisterial clerk and generally conducted himself in such an undignified and disorderly manner as to interrupt the proceedings the respondent is then supposed to have uttered some words which the ..... according to the learned government pleader this certainly constitutes contempt of court and not mere interruption of court and insult to the officer which would be a separate offence punishable .....

Brown Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or more persons or 5 holding of an unlawful assembly or 6 interruption of any lawful assembly of people or 7 commission of any other ..... to agitate to arouse from a state of repose to molest to interrupt to hinder to disquiet 379 u s at 379 u s 551 ..... to agitate to arouse from a state of repose to molest to interrupt to hinder to disquiet in light of these possible clearly unconstitutional applications .....

Soni Lalji Jetha and ors. Vs. Soni Kalidas Devchand and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1967SC978; [1967]1SCR873

..... having possession of the property taken from him it cannot be said that it had interrupted possession nor can it in law affect the nature of the possession unless it does ..... be deemed to have been adverse throughout and could not be said to have been interrupted by the mortgage decree see also bogilal v ratanlal a i r 1939 bom 261 .....

United States Vs. Grinnell Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of cheaper forms of protection others will not be willing or able to risk serious interruption to their businesses even though covered by insurance and will thus be unwilling to consider .....