Skip to content


Interrupting - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: interrupting Year: 1997 Page 1 of about 103 results (0.006 seconds)
Sep 10 1997 (HC)

K. Manikyaraja Ballal Vs. State of Karnataka

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-10-1997

Reported in: ILR1998KAR992

..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 02 1997 (HC)

Basavarajappa Appa Vs. Associated Business Corporation

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jan-02-1997

Reported in: 1997(2)KarLJ459

..... s r bannurmath k ramanna jj parole question whether parole extended to the detenue would interrupt the period of detention held the period spent under parole will not count as a ..... would stand automatically extended even if a person is on parole normally parole will not interrupt the period of detention however if the rules or even the order of parole indicates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 06 1997 (HC)

S. Ravichandra Vs. Debt Recovery Tribunal, Bangalore and Another

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Dec-06-1997

Reported in: ILR1998KAR1951; 1998(5)KarLJ162

..... s r bannurmath k ramanna jj parole question whether parole extended to the detenue would interrupt the period of detention held the period spent under parole will not count as a ..... would stand automatically extended even if a person is on parole normally parole will not interrupt the period of detention however if the rules or even the order of parole indicates .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 05 1997 (SC)

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Co. Ltd. and Another Vs. Gajanan Y. Ma ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: May-05-1997

Reported in: AIR1997SC2774; 1997(2)BLJR1716; [1998]92CompCas335(SC); 1997(2)CTC175; JT1997(6)SC20; (1997)117PLR868; RLW1997(2)SC346; 1997(4)SCALE296; (1997)5SCC507; [1997]Supp1SCR80

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place when the vehicle was being used with the same defects as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 27 1997 (SC)

Rajeev Mankotia Vs. Secretary to the President of India and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-27-1997

Reported in: AIR1997SC2766; JT1997(5)SC663; 1997(4)SCALE368; (1997)10SCC441; [1997]3SCR421; 1997(2)LC362(SC)

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place that was followed by grant of independence to the nation and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 24 1997 (HC)

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Umesh Kumar

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-24-1997

Reported in: 1997IVAD(Delhi)741; 1998CriLJ604; 70(1997)DLT600; 1997(42)DRJ627; 1997RLR497

..... section 228 353 355 section 482 cr pc judicial barbarism remarks against judicial officer insult interruption of public servant holding judicial proceedings assault on public servant discharging of his duty dishonour .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 19 1997 (SC)

Dr. Sadhna Devi and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-19-1997

Reported in: AIR1997SC1120; JT1997(3)SC255; 1997(2)SCALE189; (1997)3SCC90; [1997]2SCR186; 1997(1)LC458(SC); (1997)2UPLBEC981

..... two activities being so in tegrated that the connection between the two cannot be voluntarily interrupted without a breach of the contract or the compulsion arising from the nature of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 12 1997 (HC)

Joginder Singh Vs. the State of Haryana and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-12-1997

Reported in: (1998)118PLR619

..... may be condoned subject to the following conditions namely 1 the interruption should have been caused by reasons beyond the control of ..... government employee concerned 2 service preceding the interruption should not be less than five years duration in cases ..... this discretion is not absolute and in a case where interruption in service has been caused by reasons beyond the control .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 1997 (HC)

Shri Baburam Rameshwar Vs. M/S. Phoenix Mills Ltd. and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-25-1997

Reported in: 1998(1)ALLMR570; 1998(3)BomCR790

..... period been in uninterrupted service including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness accident leave absence from duty ..... to any fault of the employee whether such uninterrupted or interrupted service was rendered before or after the commencement of ..... and consequently the production of cotton and cloth had been interrupted further as already pointed out in the application moved before .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 1997 (HC)

Kothari Industrial Corporation, Unit : Adoni Spinning and Weaving Co. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-12-1997

Reported in: 1997(6)ALT408

..... period been in uninterrupted service including service which may be interrupted on account of sickness accident leave absence from duty ..... service means uninterrupted service and includes service which is interrupted by sickness accident leave lay off strike or a ..... fault of the employee concerned whether such uninterrupted or interrupted service was rendered before or after the commencement of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //