Interrupting - Judgment Search Results

Manmohan Singh and anr. Vs. the Director of Estates,

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1 the applicants are aggrieved by the letter issued by the respondents dated 14 3 1997 rejecting their request for...

C. Kalegouda Vs. K. Sadashivappa

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1998(2)ALD(Cri)459; 1999(1)ALT(Cri)86; [1998]93CompCas423(Kar); 1998CriLJ3539; ILR1998KAR2143; 1998(4)KarLJ526

..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....

Vijaya Kumar Shrotriya Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1998(1)SC692; (1998)IIIMLJ22(SC); 1998(1)SCALE598; (1998)3SCC397; [1998]1SCR883; (1998)1UPLBEC700

..... to return the mere fact that letters were written expressing such an intention would not interrupt the desertion from continuing bipin chander laisinghbhai shah v prabhawati 1956 s c r 838 ..... 2 that the appellant s letter of april 1 1955 did not con stitute an interruption of the respondent s desertion by its being a just cause for her to remain .....

M.S. Angadi Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [1999(82)FLR964]; 1999(4)KarLJ193

..... notwithstanding the fact that he had put in 8 to 9 years of service without interruption and that no notice under section 25 f was issued to him termination of his ..... by government held notwithstanding the fact he had worked for 8 to 9 years without interruption on said project and had satisfied requirement of section 25 b termination of his services .....

Union of India and anr. Vs. Delhi High Court Bar Association

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998(6)SCALE287b

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place

Amit Gems Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998(6)SCALE287

..... clause 1 of regulation 22 would apply and clause 2 will have application only when interruption in service takes place

M/S. Hyderabad Vanaspathi Limited Vs. Andhra Pradesh State Electricity ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998IVAD(SC)163; AIR1998SC1715; JT1998(3)SC84; 1998(2)SCALE603; (1998)4SCC470; [1998]2SCR620; 1998(1)LC595(SC)

..... two activities being so in tegrated that the connection between the two cannot be voluntarily interrupted without a breach of the contract or the compulsion arising from the nature of the .....

Arjuna Udayar (Died) and ors. Vs. Munuswamy Naicker and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1998)3MLJ537

..... any building have been peaceably enjoyed therewith as an easement without interruption and for twenty years and where support from one person s ..... of which it is to cease explanation ii nothing is an interruption within the meaning of this section unless where there is an ..... suit must be filed within two years from the date of interruption the admitted case of the plaintiff himself is that channel was .....

Bidhi Chand Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1999)121PLR180

..... of service was to be treated as qualifying service for pension purposes except where the interruption had been caused by resignation dismissal or removal from service or due to participation in ..... but the conditions have been done away with by the amendment with the result that interruption between two stretches of services under the punjab government stood automatically condoned for the purpose .....

Krishna Ramanujam V. and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2001)IIILLJ630Mad

..... been similarly defined it reads continuous service means uninterrupted service and includes services which is interrupted by sickness accident leave layoff strike or a lockout or cessation of work not ..... however for the limited purpose of the conferment of the benefits under not withstanding any interruption in service during those twelve months brought about by sickness accident or authorised leave .....