Intendment - Judgment Search Results

Sedima, S.P.R.L. Vs. Imrex Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... isolated criminal episodes the enterprise element when coupled with the pattern requirement was intended by the congress to keep the reach of rico focused directly on traditional organized ..... statute beyond traditional mobster and racketeer activity and comparable ongoing structured criminal enterprises was intended to be incidental and only to the extent necessary to maintain the constitutionality of .....

Cornelius Vs. Naacp Leg. Def. Fund

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for expressive activity indicates that at least some expressive activity is compatible with the intended uses of the public property if the government draws the boundaries of the forum to ..... narrowly tailored to serve some compelling governmental interest other than preserving the property for its intended uses b petitioner does not even argue that the government s exclusion of respondents from .....

Marek Vs. Chesney

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in statutory phraseology neither congress nor the drafters of the rules could possibly have intended such inexplicable variations in settlement incentives moreover the court s interpretation will seriously ..... prescribed reasonableness standard of 1988 and by divesting courts of the discretion congress intended them to exercise the court has assumed a forbidden roving authority to make .....

Lindahl Vs. Opm

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that that standard applied to judicial review of disability retirement decisions generally and intended that scroggins review continue except to the extent augmented by the more exacting ..... legislative history or persuasive functional argument to the contrary we cannot assume that congress intended to create such a bizarre jurisdictional patchwork footnote 37 accordingly we conclude that .....

United States Vs. Locke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... created an impermissible irrebuttable presumption that claimants who failed to make a timely filing intended to abandon their claims rather than relying on this presumption the government was obliged ..... meaning of abandonment at common law the district court concluded that 314 c was intended to incorporate the traditional common law distinction between abandonment and forfeiture thus reasoned the .....

Meccano Industries (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras

Reported in: (1985)14ITD151(Mad.)

..... its earlier nature the supreme court stressed the importance of the actual condition and the intended user these two tests cannot obviously be applied simultaneously if actual condition is agricultural on ..... a particular date the intended user may be of no significance but if the actual condition is not agricultural the .....

Harper and Row Vs. Nation Enterprises

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s unauthorized use of the undisseminated manuscript had not merely the incidental effect but the intended purpose of supplanting the copyright holders commercially valuable right of first publication ii while ..... nature of copyrighted material is only relevant to letters or other confidential writings not intended for dissemination it is true that common law copyright was often enlisted in the .....

Lohia Machines Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1985SC421; (1985)1CompLJ249(SC); (1985)44CTR(SC)328; [1985]152ITR308(SC); 1985(1)SCALE115; (1985)2SCC197; [1985]2SCR686

..... the context of section 80j because parliament could not have possibly intended to favour affluent assessees who are able to employ their ..... to by us it is obvious that if the legislature intended that the capital employed must include long term borrowings the ..... statute says sutherland may be retrospective if the legislature clearly so intends if the retrospective feature of a law is arbitrary and .....

Garrett Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... we think here logic supports the conclusion also indicated by the legislative history that congress intended separate punishments for the underlying substantive predicates and for the cce offense congress may of ..... does not bar garrett s prosecution under 848 because i also agree that congress intended to authorize separate punishment for the underlying predicate offenses and the violation of 848 i .....

MountaIn States Tel. Vs. Santana Ana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in recent generations the department s solicitor concluded last year that congress did not intend section 17 to be construed as authorizing the alienation of pueblo lands that the contrary ..... to the five civilized tribes during the colloquy discussed above supports its conclusion that congress intended to authorize outright alienation of pueblo lands subject only to secretarial approval see ante at .....