Intendment - Year 1982 - Judgments

Jul 02 1982 (FN)

Enmund Vs. Florida

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-02-1982

..... accessorial liability the petitioner has been convicted of two murders that he did not specifically intend footnote 2 24 thus it is necessary to examine the concept of proportionality as enunciated ..... murder footnote 2 24 strictly speaking this court cannot state unequivocally whether the petitioner specifically intended either to kill the kerseys or to have them killed because the trial court made .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 03 1982 (FN)

Merrill Lynch Vs. Curran

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-03-1982

..... provisions designed to prevent price manipulation the legislative history clearly indicates that congress intended to protect all futures traders from price manipulation and other fraudulent conduct violative ..... members of congress expressed a concern that the exclusive jurisdiction provision which was intended only to consolidate federal regulation of commodity futures trading in the commission might .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 1982 (FN)

Kremer Vs. Chemical Constr. Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-17-1982

..... adverse arbitration under a collective bargaining agreement the court emphasized that congress intended a scheme of overlapping independent supplementary discrimination remedies l egislative enactments in this area ..... weight the legislative history of the substantial weight amendment indicates that congress intended for the eeoc to refrain only from overturning state decisions peremptorily and for .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 1982 (FN)

Mcelroy Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-23-1982

..... by using channels of interstate commerce supports the conclusion that congress could not have intended to require federal prosecutors to prove that the securities had been forged before crossing ..... of the other legislators who used interchangeably the various phrases footnote 2 6 nevertheless intended the statutory formulation transportation in interstate commerce of stolen motor vehicles to mean any .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 13 1982 (FN)

Kaiser Steel Corp. Vs. Mullins

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-13-1982

..... actions for delinquent contributions brought by pension fund trustees it is urged that congress intended to preclude employers from raising defenses such as those kaiser has attempted to raise ..... contributions by employers to those plans the legislative history also demonstrates that congress expressly intended 306 a to simplify and expedite plan trustees suits to recover contractually required but .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 05 1982 (FN)

American Tobacco Co. Vs. Patterson

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-05-1982

..... after the effective date of title vii nor does the legislative history reveal that congress intended to distinguish between adoption and application of a bona fide seniority system the most which ..... 703 h might be understandable if the legislative history clearly indicated that congress did not intend to distinguish the adoption of a seniority plan from its subsequent application but the court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 17 1982 (FN)

North Haven Bd. of Educ. Vs. Bell

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-17-1982

..... 901 inconclusive the court examined the legislative history and concluded that the provision was intended to prohibit employment discrimination the court also found the subpart e regulations consistent ..... 1972 expressly a conscious choice therefore the omission of 1004 suggests that congress intended that 901 prohibit gender discrimination in employment petitioners and the dissent contend however .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 1982 (FN)

Oregon Vs. Kennedy

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-24-1982

..... 611 we said the double jeopardy clause does protect a defendant against governmental actions intended to provoke mistrial requests and thereby to subject defendants to the substantial burdens imposed ..... of that case the double jeopardy clause does protect a defendant against governmental actions intended to provoke mistrial requests and thereby to subject defendants to the substantial burdens imposed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 1982 (FN)

Board of Educ. Vs. Rowley

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-1982

..... at 19483 the legislative history thus directly supports the conclusion that the act intends to give handicapped children an educational opportunity commensurate with that given other children the majority ..... deliberate change in the review provision is an unusually clear indication that congress intended courts to undertake substantive review instead of relying on the conclusions of the state agency .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 1982 (FN)

Williams Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-29-1982

..... formal loan transactions after today s decision a bank s protection against false statements intended to influence credit transactions depends not upon whether a misrepresentation was made in connection with ..... of the statute is cast in broad rather than restrictive terms congress plainly intended to proscribe the willful overvaluation of anything of value given to a lending institution there .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Intendment - Judgment Search Results