Amendment - Judgment Search Results
DHAMADHARAN (Amended as)R.Dhamotharan, Vs KOWSALYA
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-30-2026
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 30.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P. VADAMALAI and R.Dhamotharan .. Appellant Vs. Kowsalya .. Respondent Prayer : Civil Miscellaneous Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of...
(Cause Title Amended) Abdul Gafoor vs the Sub Inspector of Police
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-05-2020
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 05TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 16TH MAGHA, 1941 WP(C).No.1605 OF 2020(A) PETITIONER:(CAUSE TITLE AMENDED) ABDUL GAFOOR, AGED 68 YEARS, S/O. MONUTTY, ARACKALVETTATH HOUSE, POONKUNNAM, THRISSUR-680002. CAUSE TITLE IS AMENDED TO SHOW THAT
Amended Cwp No. 1022 of 2010 Vs. State of Haryana and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-23-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amended CWP No.1022 of 2010 Date of Decision :23. 11.2012 Ram Singh ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and others
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Amended Cwp No.9201 of 1994 Vs. State of Punjab and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Nov-29-2012
CWP No.9201 of 1994 -1- *** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Amended CWP No.9201 of 1994 Date of decision:29. 11.2012 Gurbax Singh .....Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others .....Respondents
Amended Cwp No.3754 of 1994 Vs. Municipal Committee and Another
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-13-2012
purposes of the question arising in the present petition and the said Sub-clause (b) reads, prior to its amendment in the year 1994, as under:" (1) "annual value" means - (a) ***** Amended CWP No.3754 of 1994
Amendment Sought in His Written Statement by the Petitioner- Vs. Ashok ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-14-2014
BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON Present: Mr.Raj Kumar Chandana, Advocate for the petitioner. **** Dr.Bharat Bhushan Parsoon, J. (Oral) 1. Amendment sought in his written statement by the petitioner- tenant has been declined vide order dated 7.5.2014 (Annexure P-5)
In Re Amendment to Rule 39
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-29-1991
In re Amendment to Rule 39 - 500 U.S. 13 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court In re Amendment to Rule 39, 500
Girija Indran vs (Amended)the Coir Vyavasaya Co-Operative Society No. ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: May-31-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 31ST DAY OF MAY 2022 / 10TH JYAISHTA, 1944 PETITIONER: GIRIJA INDRAN, AGED 59 YEARS W/O INDRAN, PUTHUKATTU HOUSE, CHERAI(P.O),ERNAKULAM...
K.Kunjunni vs the Administrator (Amended)
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Aug-02-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 11TH SRAVANA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 17306 OF 2020 PETITIONER: K.KUNJUNNI U.D.CLERK, GURUVAYUR DEVASWOM OFFICE,...
Vinjamuri Venkatanarasimhacharyulu Vs. Jami Gangaraju (Amended As) Gan ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-30-1940
Reported in: AIR1941Mad607; (1941)1MLJ554
Patanjali Sastri, J.1. This revision petition raises an interesting question of law on which it is said there is no direct authority.2. The petitioner brought the suit for recovery of the first year's rent payable under...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free