Intendment - Judgment Search Results

S.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365

..... been devised for interpretation language being an imperfect vehicle of translating thoughts and intendments when the legislature finishes its task and produces a legislation in more general terms ..... situation or provide for a certain eventuality are all relevant considerations in ascertaining the intendment of the constitution ascertain the underlying purpose and give such construction to the provision .....

Middlesex County Sewerage Auth. Vs. Sea Clammers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... enforcement suits by government officials and private citizens it cannot be assumed that congress intended to authorize by implication additional judicial remedies for private citizens suing under the ..... in view of these elaborate enforcement provisions it cannot be assumed that congress intended to authorize by implication additional judicial remedies for private citizens suing under mprsa .....

Pennhurst State Sch. and Hosp. Vs. Halderman

Court: US Supreme Court

..... substantive rights to appropriate treatment in the least restrictive environment assuming that congress did intend to create such a right petitioners question the authority of congress to impose ..... rights surely congress would not have established such elaborate funding incentives had it simply intended to impose absolute obligations on the states respondents nonetheless insist that the fact that .....

Board of Governors, Frs Vs. Investment Co. Inst.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... conclusion that nothing in the 1956 act or its legislative history indicates that congress intended to prohibit bank holding companies from acting as investment advisers to closed end investment ..... under this legislation or under any future legislation in particular the language is not intended to inhibit the underwriting of revenue bonds nor operating commingled or managing agency accounts .....

Cbs, Inc. Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... light of the preexisting statutory policies concerning access is far broader than congress could have intended to allow the court unfortunately accepts this major departure from the underlying themes of ..... broadcasting system inc v democratic national committee supra at 412 u s 110 congress intended to permit private broadcasting to develop with the widest journalistic freedom consistent with its .....

Lehman Vs. Nakshian

Court: US Supreme Court

..... relief which are equally present in 15 c it intended that a jury trial right be available that congress used the words ..... c when this court decided in lorillard that congress intended adea actions against private employers to include a jury trial right and ..... which lorillard partially relied suggests that congress did not intend to allow jury trials against the federal government but our decision .....

Universities Research Assn., Inc. Vs. Coutu

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or wage determinations under the davis bacon act alternatively petitioner contends that congress did not intend that the davis bacon act be enforced through private actions because we conclude that the ..... 71st cong 3d sess 1 1931 in the words of representative bacon the act was intended to combat the practice of certain itinerant irresponsible contractors with itinerant cheap bootleg labor who .....

County of Washington Vs. Gunther

Court: US Supreme Court

..... consequences for title vii litigation title vii s prohibition of discriminatory employment practices was intended to be broadly inclusive proscribing not only overt discrimination but also practices that ..... bennett and representative celler and the contemporaneous interpretation of the eeoc indicates that congress intended to incorporate the substantive standards of the equal pay act into title vii .....

Montana Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of country heretofore described 2 kappler 595 footnote 6 the treaty nowhere suggested that congress intended to grant authority to the crow tribe to regulate hunting and fishing by nonmembers on ..... hoar 1067 sens edmunds and williams it defies common sense to suppose that congress would intend that non indians purchasing allotted lands would become subject to tribal jurisdiction when an avowed .....

Albernaz Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... conspiracy to distribute the court of appeals affirmed the convictions and sentences held 1 congress intended to permit the imposition of consecutive sentences for violations of 846 and 963 even ..... rejected the opportunity to abandon blockburger as the test to apply in determining whether congress intended to impose multiple punishment for a single act which violates several statutory provisions in .....