Intendment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: intendment Year: 1972 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.031 seconds)Furman Vs. Georgia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1972
..... cannot now know exactly what the framers thought cruel and unusual punishments were certainly they intended to ban torturous punishments but the available evidence does not support the further conclusion that ..... what was then a common punishment we cannot however make the further inference that they intended to exempt this particular punishment from the express prohibition of the cruel and unusual .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEisenstadt Vs. Baird
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-22-1972
..... a registered physician may administer to or prescribe for any married person drugs or articles intended for the prevention of pregnancy or conception a registered pharmacist actually engaged in the ..... a registered physician may administer to or prescribe for any married person drugs or articles intended for the prevention of pregnancy or conception a registered pharmacist actually engaged in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS and E Contractors, Inc. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-24-1972
..... government work and will attract more speculative elements whose bids will contain contingent allowances intended to protect them from unconscionable decisions of government officials rendered during the performance ..... challenged by either party although the report asserted that amended s 2487 was intended simply to recognize the jurisdiction which the general accounting office already has footnote .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJefferson Vs. Hackney
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-30-1972
..... method of recognizing outside income we do not agree that congress intended 402 a 23 to invalidate any state computation procedures that ..... the social security act have certain common elements the states were intended by congress to keep their afdc plans separate from plans ..... for reading the statute this way since i believe that congress intended that as many needy persons as possible be permitted to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGelbard Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-26-1972
..... these cases consequently we cannot suppose that congress by providing procedures for suppression motions intended to deprive grand jury witnesses of the 2515 defense that would otherwise be available ..... report in its introductory discussion of title vii contains the following statement title vii intends to limit disclosure of information illegally obtained by the government to defendants who seek .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Anant Mills Co. Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-04-1972
Reported in: (1973)14GLR826
..... equal protection of the laws as abstract propositions laws being the expression of legislative will intended to solve specific problems or to achieve definite objectives by specific remedies absolute equality ..... of properties and pointed out that it was hardly possible that the legislature could have intended that the corporation should undertake such a difficult and almost impossible task in order .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTidewater Oil Co. Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-06-1972
..... expediting act the legislative history strongly suggests an essentially contrary conclusion the subsection was intended to apply only to interlocutory orders not otherwise appealable under 1292 a in civil ..... those covered by b footnote 40 nevertheless petitioner would have us conclude that congress intended to establish court of appeals jurisdiction for all interlocutory orders in expediting act cases .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. United States Dist. Ct.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-19-1972
..... expression of congressional neutrality the debate above explicitly indicates that nothing in 2511 3 was intended to expand or to contract or to define whatever presidential surveillance powers existed in ..... may be received in evidence only where such interception was reasonable this sentence seems intended to assure that when the president conducts lawful surveillance pursuant to whatever power he .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBennett Coleman and Co. and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-30-1972
Reported in: AIR1973SC106; (1972)2SCC788; [1973]2SCR757
..... judicially recognized specifics first professor alexander meiklejohn s assertion that the first amendment was intended to define not an individual right to speak but rather a community right to ..... justice harlan speaking for the majority observed on the other hand general regulatory statutes not intended to control the content of speech but incidentally limiting its unfettered exercise have not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShantilal Babubhai and ors. Vs. Bai Chhani and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-10-1972
Reported in: AIR1973Guj146; (1973)0GLR45
..... circumstances to indicate that such full proprietary rights were not intended to be conferred so also in bajrang bhadur v bakhtraj ..... or in the surrounding circumstances which indicate that absolute rights not intended to be conferred the supreme court also observed in a ..... an absolute owner also support the view that what was intended to be conveyed by the word vyavastha was disposition or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial