Intendment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: intendment Year: 1983 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.021 seconds)Guardians Assn. Vs. Civil Svc. Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1983
..... however was whether title vi forbids intentional discrimination in the form of affirmative action intended to remedy past discrimination even though such affirmative action is permitted by the ..... discrimination that the constitution forbids it is sensible to construe title vi a statute intended to protect racial minorities as not forbidding those intentional but benign racial classifications .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDirector, Owcp Vs. Perini North River Assocs.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-11-1983
..... defined in the course of their employment upon those waters according to perini congress intended to overrule legislatively this court s decision in calbeck and the status requirement was added ..... the 1972 amendments on the contrary the legislative history indicates that congress did not intend to exclude other employees traditionally covered moreover congress explicitly deleted the language from 3 a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRuckelshause Vs. Sierra Club
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1983
..... which does not describe respondents claims in this case respondents contend however that congress intended the term appropriate to encompass situations beyond those mentioned in the legislative history and ..... unreasonable to presume against the background of attorney s fees statutes generally that congress intended fees to be awarded to every nonprevailing party who has litigated a nonfrivolous challenge .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPsc Vs. Mid-louisiana Gas Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1983
..... incumbent upon us to consider carefully the commission s arguments that congress implicitly intended to exempt pipeline production from an otherwise comprehensive regulatory scheme we think it ..... that the intracorporate transfer should not automatically receive the ngpa ceiling price congress undoubtedly intended pipeline producers to be treated in the same manner as pipeline affiliate producers .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTins Vs. Chadha
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-1983
..... element in the distribution of powers under the constitution widely endorsed among the framers and intended to serve the president as a defense against legislative encroachment and to check the ..... comment and the brevity of the convention s consideration all suggest a modest role was intended for the clause and no broad restraint on congressional authority was contemplated see stewart .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWatt Vs. Western Nuclear, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-06-1983
..... term minerals prevailing in 1916 does not indicate whether congress intended the mineral reservation in the srha to encompass gravel on ..... relying on zimmerman as evidence that congress could not have intended the term minerals to encompass gravel although the legal understanding ..... footnote 12 page 462 u s 52 b since congress intended to facilitate development of both surface and subsurface resources the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmith Vs. Wade
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1983
..... that when congress was silent on a point it intended to adopt the principles of the common law with which it ..... recognized in ordinary tort litigation and that they likely intended these common law principles to obtain absent specific provisions to ..... circumstances the section has been consistently construed as not intending wholesale revocation of the common law immunity afforded government officials .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMartinez Vs. Bynum
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-02-1983
..... not be excluded from the local free schools if they intend to remain indefinitely in the district the court is able ..... admitted mexican citizen entered tyler with his school age children intending to remain only six months those children would be viewed ..... guardians for educational purposes those children unlike all others must intend to remain indefinitely in a particular school district in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssociated Gen. Contractors Vs. Carpenters
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-22-1983
..... was a foreseeable consequence of the antitrust violation but also because that injury was specifically intended by the defendants the court noted that its conclusion was consistent with other cases ..... i am not aware of any cases exonerating an intentional tortfeasor from responsibility for the intended consequences of his actions merely because he inflicted harm upon his victim indirectly rather .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBriscoe Vs. Lahue
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-07-1983
..... law principles including defenses previously recognized in ordinary tort litigation and that they likely intended these common law principles to obtain absent specific provisions to the contrary city of ..... which had enacted a criminal sanction directed against state judicial officials footnote 2 26 intended sub silentio to exempt those same officials from the civil counterpart approaches the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial