Intendment - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: intendment Year: 1978 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.025 seconds)Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1978
..... and programs it is extremely unlikely that congress without a word indicating that it intended to do so contemplated creating an independent private statutory cause of action against all private ..... accommodations for whites and negroes the court held that the fourteenth amendment was not intended to abolish distinctions based upon color or to enforce social as distinguished from political equality .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMonell Vs. Department of Soc. Svcs.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-06-1978
..... its constitutional authority to impose civil liability on municipalities and therefore could not have intended to include municipal bodies within the class of persons subject to the act reexamination ..... rejection of the sherman amendment does not lead ineluctably to the conclusion that congress intended municipalities to be immune from liability under all circumstances nevertheless it cannot be page .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-25-1978
Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621
..... apply only to offences committed within the territory or by british subjects when the legislature intends the statute to apply beyond the ordinary territorial authority of the country it so ..... there was a presumption against construing even general words in an act of parliament as intended to have extra territorial effect or authorising extra territorial legislation the court observed the passages .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTennessee Valley Auth. Vs. Hill
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-15-1978
..... history and structure of the legislation under review here indicates beyond doubt that congress intended endangered species to be afforded the highest of priorities when congress passed the act ..... was never discussed while the court s review of the legislative history establishes that congress intended to require governmental agencies to take endangered species into account in the planning and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. New Mexico
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-03-1978
..... congress reserved for use in the national forests the united states contends that congress intended to reserve minimum instream flows for aesthetic recreational and fish preservation purposes an ..... use thereby defeating congress principal purpose of securing favorable conditions of water flow congress intended the national forests to be administered for broader purposes after 1960 but there .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalifornia Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-03-1978
..... did not allow for the appropriation or condemnation of the necessary water congress did not intend the secretary of the interior to initiate the project subsequent legislation authorizing a specific ..... been apparent from examination of the congressional authorization of the central valley project that congress intended the secretary to have the power to condemn any necessary water rights we disavow .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Board of Comm'rs of Sheffield
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-06-1978
..... the district court s construction unless there were persuasive evidence either that 5 was intended to apply only to changes affecting the registration process or that congress clearly manifested ..... as functional units or levels of government the conclusion clearly follows that this definition was intended to operate only for purposes of determining which political units in nondesignated states may .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLockett Vs. Ohio
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-03-1978
..... brother white concedes that approximately half permit the execution of persons who did not actually intend to cause death footnote 2 3 the 18 state statutes specifically permitting consideration of a ..... of aggravated murder with aggravating specifications and sentenced to death without a finding that he intended death to result but only that he engaged in criminal conduct which posed a substantial .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSt. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. Vs. Barry
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1978
..... practices by insurers falling outside of the realm of state supervised cooperative action congress intended to preserve sherman act review of certain forms of regulation by private combinations and ..... partially in effect during the moratorium suggests that the provision may have been initially intended to prevent interference with the prosecution of the defendants in south eastern underwriters who .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNlrb Vs. Robbins Tire and Rubber Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-15-1978
..... a case is pending would generally interfere with enforcement proceedings and more particularly did not intend to overturn the nlrb s longstanding rule against prehearing disclosure of witnesses statements pp ..... generic determinations of likely interference can ever be made we conclude that congress did not intend to prevent the federal courts from determining that with respect to particular kinds of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial