Face Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: face value Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 594 results (0.176 seconds)Ajay Kumar Shevdy Vs. the Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protect ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-20-2003
Reported in: (2004)2UPLBEC1503
..... in any country like ours with the establishment of a democratic structure based on egalitarian values and aggressive developmental strategies so must the meaning and content of the statutory provision undergo ..... the object being to enable the family to tide over the financial crisis which it faces because of the sudden death of the sole breadearner the compassionate employment cannot be claimed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChamber of Commerce and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar Gupta and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Aug-13-2003
Reported in: AIR2004J& K30,2004(1)JKJ81
nullity nor does it constitute an error apparent on the face of the record the conclusions of the order dated 7
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMcConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-10-2003
..... those goals under our precedent restrictions on political contributions implicate important first amendment values and are constitutional only if they are closely drawn to reduce the corruption ..... records and related experience before holding this similar statutory provision unconstitutional on its face even a superficial examination of those relevant agency materials reveals strong supporting .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited Breweries Holdings Vs. the Chairman, Securities and
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Sep-01-2003
Reported in: (2003)47SCL206SAT
..... a registered merchant banker b that the offer price shall be at the face value of the shares as on the date of the impugned order or the ..... plaintiffs in the bombay high court suit no 3910 of 1997 at the face value of rs 10 each b that the decision dated 1 8 2003 be ..... will be left high and dry and not be able to get fair value for their shares which they would have got had the defendants made a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Bidya Devi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: May-15-2003
Reported in: AIR2004Cal63,(2003)184CTR(Cal)97,[2003]263ITR52(Cal)
179 was not retrospective this finding would stare on the face of the parties and operate as res judicata on this of review under section 154 or 254 of the income tax act may have different implication a review of an order
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKishore Rajaram Chhabria Vs. the Chairman Securities and
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Aug-01-2003
Reported in: (2003)46SCL385SAT
..... price of the shares was reportedly much higher than the face value of the shares the face value of each share is ten rupees the shares therefore ..... registered merchant banker b that the offer price shall be at the face value of the shares as on the date of the impugned order ..... with persons allegedly acted in concert in the target company at the face value of the shares as on the date of the order or .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGratz Vs. Bollinger
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-23-2003
..... non michigan residents or 80 for michigan residents and possesses one of several qualities valued by the university these qualities include high class rank unique life experiences challenges ..... applicants substantial preferences for minority applicants will not significantly diminish the odds of admission facing white applicants l0 10 the united states points to the percentage plans used .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTodendula Venkata Krishnaiah Vs. Uppu Gangaiah
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-16-2003
Reported in: 2003(4)ALD366; 2003(4)ALT601
this court would not correct an error apparent on the face of the record or review or re weigh the evidence
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Bihar Vs. Chandra Bhanu Som and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-21-2003
Reported in: 2003CriLJ2793
the code of criminal procedure in short the code to face trial along with other co accused opposite parties cr rev
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2003
Reported in: 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669
..... be sent to judicial custody 361 what is the evidentiary value of a confession and whether the confession recorded before a police officer ..... are thereforee satisfied that this witness would have remembered the face of accused mohd afzal and deceased terrorist mohd as the persons who ..... to his court only once together just to show their faces to him the witness in his cross examination sstate d that he .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial