Skip to content


Face Value - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: face value Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 594 results (0.176 seconds)
Oct 20 2003 (HC)

Ajay Kumar Shevdy Vs. the Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protect ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-20-2003

Reported in: (2004)2UPLBEC1503

..... in any country like ours with the establishment of a democratic structure based on egalitarian values and aggressive developmental strategies so must the meaning and content of the statutory provision undergo ..... the object being to enable the family to tide over the financial crisis which it faces because of the sudden death of the sole breadearner the compassionate employment cannot be claimed .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 2003 (HC)

Chamber of Commerce and ors. Vs. Ashok Kumar Gupta and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Aug-13-2003

Reported in: AIR2004J& K30,2004(1)JKJ81

nullity nor does it constitute an error apparent on the face of the record the conclusions of the order dated 7

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2003 (FN)

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Dec-10-2003

..... those goals under our precedent restrictions on political contributions implicate important first amendment values and are constitutional only if they are closely drawn to reduce the corruption ..... records and related experience before holding this similar statutory provision unconstitutional on its face even a superficial examination of those relevant agency materials reveals strong supporting .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 01 2003 (TRI)

United Breweries Holdings Vs. the Chairman, Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Sep-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)47SCL206SAT

..... a registered merchant banker b that the offer price shall be at the face value of the shares as on the date of the impugned order or the ..... plaintiffs in the bombay high court suit no 3910 of 1997 at the face value of rs 10 each b that the decision dated 1 8 2003 be ..... will be left high and dry and not be able to get fair value for their shares which they would have got had the defendants made a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 15 2003 (HC)

Smt. Bidya Devi Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-15-2003

Reported in: AIR2004Cal63,(2003)184CTR(Cal)97,[2003]263ITR52(Cal)

179 was not retrospective this finding would stare on the face of the parties and operate as res judicata on this of review under section 154 or 254 of the income tax act may have different implication a review of an order

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 01 2003 (TRI)

Kishore Rajaram Chhabria Vs. the Chairman Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Aug-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)46SCL385SAT

..... price of the shares was reportedly much higher than the face value of the shares the face value of each share is ten rupees the shares therefore ..... registered merchant banker b that the offer price shall be at the face value of the shares as on the date of the impugned order ..... with persons allegedly acted in concert in the target company at the face value of the shares as on the date of the order or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 2003 (FN)

Gratz Vs. Bollinger

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-23-2003

..... non michigan residents or 80 for michigan residents and possesses one of several qualities valued by the university these qualities include high class rank unique life experiences challenges ..... applicants substantial preferences for minority applicants will not significantly diminish the odds of admission facing white applicants l0 10 the united states points to the percentage plans used .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 2003 (HC)

Todendula Venkata Krishnaiah Vs. Uppu Gangaiah

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Apr-16-2003

Reported in: 2003(4)ALD366; 2003(4)ALT601

this court would not correct an error apparent on the face of the record or review or re weigh the evidence

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 21 2003 (HC)

The State of Bihar Vs. Chandra Bhanu Som and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Feb-21-2003

Reported in: 2003CriLJ2793

the code of criminal procedure in short the code to face trial along with other co accused opposite parties cr rev

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 29 2003 (HC)

Sstate Vs. Mohd. Afzal and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Oct-29-2003

Reported in: 2003VIIAD(Delhi)1; 107(2003)DLT385; 2003(71)DRJ178; 2003(3)JCC1669

..... be sent to judicial custody 361 what is the evidentiary value of a confession and whether the confession recorded before a police officer ..... are thereforee satisfied that this witness would have remembered the face of accused mohd afzal and deceased terrorist mohd as the persons who ..... to his court only once together just to show their faces to him the witness in his cross examination sstate d that he .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //