Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Face Value - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 03 2014

“faced with This Situation a Last Effort Was Made by the Vs. Major S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-03-2014

CWP No.10095 of 1996 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH1 CWP No.10095 of 1996 Date of Decision:03.07.2014 Punjab State Electricity Board ..Petitioner versus Major Singh and others ..Respondents 2. CWP No.14092...


Aug 06 2018

Mukesh Sharma vs.m/s Faces Cosmetics (India) Pvt. Ltd. & Ors

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-06-2018

No.628/2018 + % MUKESH SHARMA6h August, 2018 Through: Mr. G.C.Sharma and Mr. Bhola ..... Appellant Singh, Advocates. M/S FACES COSMETICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD. & ORS. ..... Respondent versus CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred


Aug 23 2023

Forum of Akshaya Centre Entrepreneurs (Face) vs the Unique Identificat ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Aug-23-2023

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF AUGUST 2023 / 1ST BHADRA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 27795 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S:1 FORUM OF AKSHAYA CENTRE ENTREPRENEURS (FACE)...


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 04 2026

Elevar Digitel Infrastructure Private Limited vs the Deputy Commission ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-04-2026

Matched in: Parties Elevar Digitel Infrastructure Private Limited vs the Deputy Commissioner (Ct) (Appeal) Face)


Sep 16 2013

i) the Occurrence in This Case Is of 10.1.2001 and He Has Already Face ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Sep-16-2013

and his co-accused Rakesh Kumar son of Raghunath having a sword (Kirpan) alighted from the car with muffled faces. They attacked and started causing injuries on the head of the complainant. He raised his left hand in … regard.15. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, having gone through the evidence on record with their valuable help and after bestowal of thoughts over the entire matter, to my mind, there is no merit in


Jan 23 2014

Allegations on the Face of It Relate to Exchange of Vs. State of Harya ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-23-2014

the alleged incident of taking away money from the complainant has occurred in his presence. Allegations on the face of it relate to exchange of currency/foreign exchange. Version put forth on behalf of the petitioner does not


Aug 20 2014

The Petitioner and His Brother Sonu Have Been Facing Trial for Vs. Sta ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-20-2014

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYNA AT CHANDIGARH. Cr. Misc. M23123of 2014 Date of decision:- 20.8.2014 Amit Kumar @ Meeta Petitioner versus State of Punjab Respondent Present: Mr.Veneet Sharma, Advocate. Mr.Ankur...


Oct 20 2003

Ajay Kumar Shevdy Vs. the Chief Security Commissioner, Railway Protect ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-20-2003

Reported in: (2004)2UPLBEC1503

the rules and the object being to enable the family to tide over the financial crisis which it faces because of the sudden death of the sole breadearner, the compassionate employment cannot be claimed and offered after … bound to do in any country like ours with the establishment of a democratic structure based on egalitarian values and aggressive developmental strategies, so must the meaning and content of the statutory provision undergo a change. It


  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial