Face Value - Judgment Search Results

Mckune Vs. Lile

Court: US Supreme Court

..... state whereas palmigiano s silence was given no more evidentiary value than was war 61 ranted by the facts surrounding his case ..... treatment by prison authorities to judicial oversight 60 any defendant faced with the option of either testifying or accepting the risk that ..... with the greater offense prior to plea bargaining and therefore faced the denial of leniency rather than an enhanced penalty id at .....

Sunil and ors. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2001CriLJ3063

she stated that all the accused persons were not muffled face she also stated that she was not aware which person

Smt. A. Kavita Prasad, Dr. A.J. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Gift Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2002)82ITD677(Hyd.)

..... sharesholdings in various companies such as hyderabad batteries as their capital the following shares at face value were brought into the firm m s beaver engineering at the inception of the firm ..... beaver engineering the assets being shares in a specified limited company have been introduced at face value that does not mean that the consideration received by them is inadequate the apex court .....

Canara Bank Vs. National thermal Power

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2002)110CompCas107

..... on 11 12 2000 since the redemption amount comprised of only the face value of the bonds the fund accepted the amount under protest and ..... due dates of redemption till the date of payment of the face value of the bonds however the learned counsel for ntpc pointed out ..... principles of restitution for the fund to claim interest on the face value of the bonds for the period during which the money was .....

Ajay Kumar Rana Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

accused includes the person who has not been summoned to face the trial after an inquiry under section 202 of the

Baliah David A. Vs. Regional Manager, Central Bank of India and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2002)ILLJ270Mad

no adequate time allowed for him to get ready to face the enquiry in spite of his request made for an

Sanjeet Singh Grewal Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2001P& H261

not been honoured the action of the government shall inevitably face a question mark 49 what is the position factually it legislative measure was calculated to facilitate optimum exploitation of the valuable asset of urban land 39 it has been specifically mentioned

Joginder Pal Dhiman Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2002CriLJ677

..... f d r the appellant knowingly deliberately with mala fide intention changed face value of above said three f d rs to rs 20 000 rs ..... made forged entries in the record of the bank by showing the face value of three f d rs deposited by him in his own name ..... appellant with criminal intent misused his authority as officiating manager and forged face value of the f d rs from small amounts to higher amounts of .....

Panchumarthi Anuradha Vs. Avala Nagarani and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(1)ALD521; 2001(6)ALT692

legal infirmities and is vitiated by errors apparent on the face of the record requiring the correction of this court in

Sanjeev Kumar Sinha, Etc. Vs. State Bank of India and ors. Etc.

Court: Patna

..... the tune of rs 80 000 which on the basis of market value as in between 18th february 1999 to 17th april 2001 could have ..... as the family of the deceased cannot be said to be facing any financial crisis in the second case learned counsel for the bank ..... and circumstances aforementioned there cannot be any question of the family facing any financial crisis on account of sudden death of the sole bread .....