Face Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: face value Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 493 results (0.143 seconds)Brockett Vs. Spokane Arcades, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-19-1985
..... sexual conduct and on the whole have no serious literary artistic political or scientific value appellants submit that the latter two miller guidelines which the washington statute faithfully follows ..... challenges the court of appeals reversed invalidating the statute in its entirety on its face on the ground that the definition of prurient as including lust was unconstitutionally overbroad .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChandan and Bharat Enterprises Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune
Decided on: Mar-26-1985
Reported in: (1985)14ITD91(Pune.)
..... for payment of sum of rs 1 lakh and not shares of the face value of rs 1 lakh it is true that the clause also mentions ..... agreed to receive is not cash of rs 1 lakh but shares of face value of rs 1 lakh shri jairaman then next pointed out that the ..... than rs 1 lakh by referring to allotment of shares the face value is prima facie the value of the consideration we cannot for this purpose impart the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCornelius Vs. Naacp Leg. Def. Fund
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1985
..... a lesser degree of protection this argument is premised on the inherent differences between the face to face solicitation involved in village of schaumburg and the 30 word written statements at issue ..... court s multitiered analysis of equal protection cases however i am somewhat skeptical about the value of this analytical approach in the actual decisional process see cleburne v cleburne living center .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRohiniben Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-30-1985
Reported in: (1985)13ITD830(Mum.)
..... first method is to take the cost as the equivalent of the face value of the bonus shares this method was followed by the assessee ..... the price may have to be adjusted either in proportion to the face value they bear if there is no other circumstances to differentiate them ..... the first method is to take the cost as equivalent to the face value of the bonus shares this method was followed by the assessee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLowe Vs. Sec
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1985
..... types of publications even if the advertisements of these publications occasionally quite exaggerate the value of the factual information which is supplied that the constitutional guarantee of liberty of ..... offering impersonal investment advice to their subscribers it is hardly crystal clear from the face of the statute how the primary definition and the bona fide publications exception are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Avkash Nidhi
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-04-1985
Reported in: (1986)51CTR(Guj)301; [1986]160ITR729(Guj)
..... the shareholders to the extent of the reduction of the face value of the preference shares and if yes whether the profits ..... company and the consequential payment of the proportionate amount reducing the face value of the share to rs 50 the shareholder s right ..... reduction in the share capital and the consequential reduction in the face value of the preference shares there is an extinguishment of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDeepchand Kishanlal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-11-1985
Reported in: [1986]159ITR495(KAR); [1986]159ITR495(Karn)
that the said error of law is apparent on the face of the record it may also be that in some of the commissioner the appellate assistant commissioner and the income tax officer on questions of fact are perverse which do not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDirector of Railway Movement (Coal) Eastern Railways, Calcutta Vs. Aka ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-1985
Reported in: AIR1985All314
preferential traffic schedule the illegality is writ large on the face of the record and the facts do not have to order under article 227 a mere wrong decision it was added without anything more is not enough to attract the jurisdiction
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZauderer Vs. Office of Disc. Counsel
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-28-1985
..... the extension of first amendment protection to commercial speech is justified principally by the value to consumers of the information such speech provides appellant s constitutionally protected interest in ..... agree our decision in ohralik was largely grounded on the substantial differences between face to face solicitation and the advertising we had held permissible in bates in person solicitation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCleburne Vs. Cleburne Living Ctr.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1985
..... the equal protection clause condemns with respect to a liberty so valued as the right to establish a home in the community ..... appropriate the court held that the ordinance was invalid on its face because it did not substantially further any important governmental interests ..... overbroad generalizations our cases have invalidated the presumption on its face footnote 3 25 we do not instead leave to the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial