Skip to content


Face Value - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: face value Year: 1985 Page 1 of about 493 results (0.143 seconds)
Jun 19 1985 (FN)

Brockett Vs. Spokane Arcades, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-19-1985

..... sexual conduct and on the whole have no serious literary artistic political or scientific value appellants submit that the latter two miller guidelines which the washington statute faithfully follows ..... challenges the court of appeals reversed invalidating the statute in its entirety on its face on the ground that the definition of prurient as including lust was unconstitutionally overbroad .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 26 1985 (TRI)

Chandan and Bharat Enterprises Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on: Mar-26-1985

Reported in: (1985)14ITD91(Pune.)

..... for payment of sum of rs 1 lakh and not shares of the face value of rs 1 lakh it is true that the clause also mentions ..... agreed to receive is not cash of rs 1 lakh but shares of face value of rs 1 lakh shri jairaman then next pointed out that the ..... than rs 1 lakh by referring to allotment of shares the face value is prima facie the value of the consideration we cannot for this purpose impart the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 02 1985 (FN)

Cornelius Vs. Naacp Leg. Def. Fund

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-02-1985

..... a lesser degree of protection this argument is premised on the inherent differences between the face to face solicitation involved in village of schaumburg and the 30 word written statements at issue ..... court s multitiered analysis of equal protection cases however i am somewhat skeptical about the value of this analytical approach in the actual decisional process see cleburne v cleburne living center .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 30 1985 (TRI)

Rohiniben Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-30-1985

Reported in: (1985)13ITD830(Mum.)

..... first method is to take the cost as the equivalent of the face value of the bonus shares this method was followed by the assessee ..... the price may have to be adjusted either in proportion to the face value they bear if there is no other circumstances to differentiate them ..... the first method is to take the cost as equivalent to the face value of the bonus shares this method was followed by the assessee .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 10 1985 (FN)

Lowe Vs. Sec

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-10-1985

..... types of publications even if the advertisements of these publications occasionally quite exaggerate the value of the factual information which is supplied that the constitutional guarantee of liberty of ..... offering impersonal investment advice to their subscribers it is hardly crystal clear from the face of the statute how the primary definition and the bona fide publications exception are .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 04 1985 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Avkash Nidhi

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Sep-04-1985

Reported in: (1986)51CTR(Guj)301; [1986]160ITR729(Guj)

..... the shareholders to the extent of the reduction of the face value of the preference shares and if yes whether the profits ..... company and the consequential payment of the proportionate amount reducing the face value of the share to rs 50 the shareholder s right ..... reduction in the share capital and the consequential reduction in the face value of the preference shares there is an extinguishment of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 1985 (HC)

Deepchand Kishanlal Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-11-1985

Reported in: [1986]159ITR495(KAR); [1986]159ITR495(Karn)

that the said error of law is apparent on the face of the record it may also be that in some of the commissioner the appellate assistant commissioner and the income tax officer on questions of fact are perverse which do not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 01 1985 (HC)

Director of Railway Movement (Coal) Eastern Railways, Calcutta Vs. Aka ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-01-1985

Reported in: AIR1985All314

preferential traffic schedule the illegality is writ large on the face of the record and the facts do not have to order under article 227 a mere wrong decision it was added without anything more is not enough to attract the jurisdiction

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 28 1985 (FN)

Zauderer Vs. Office of Disc. Counsel

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-28-1985

..... the extension of first amendment protection to commercial speech is justified principally by the value to consumers of the information such speech provides appellant s constitutionally protected interest in ..... agree our decision in ohralik was largely grounded on the substantial differences between face to face solicitation and the advertising we had held permissible in bates in person solicitation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 01 1985 (FN)

Cleburne Vs. Cleburne Living Ctr.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-01-1985

..... the equal protection clause condemns with respect to a liberty so valued as the right to establish a home in the community ..... appropriate the court held that the ordinance was invalid on its face because it did not substantially further any important governmental interests ..... overbroad generalizations our cases have invalidated the presumption on its face footnote 3 25 we do not instead leave to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //