Face Value - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: face value Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 452 results (0.109 seconds)Sibron Vs. New York
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-10-1968
both cases is the constitutionality of 180 a on its face held 1 sibron s completion of service of his sentence intercepted it didn t you officer the witness yes emphasis added it is of course highly unlikely that sibron facing the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWorkmen of Bengal Paper Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Bengal Paper Mills Co. Ltd. ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Dec-03-1968
Reported in: (1970)IILLJ467Cal
whether the impugned error of law is apparent on the face of the record or not 7 i fail to see
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. O'Brien
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-27-1968
whether the statutes under review were punitive in nature we face no such inquiry in this case the 1965 amendment to promulgated pursuant thereto a felony by the 1965 amendment congress added to 12 b 3 of the 1948 act the provision
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCameron Vs. Johnson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-22-1968
injunction sought even if the statute is constitutional on its face dombrowski recognized 380 u s at 380 u s 483 380 u s at 380 u s 489 490 emphasis added dombrowski establishes that the federal courts will grant relief when
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJones Vs. Alfred H. Mayer Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-17-1968
..... in 1965 substantially less the petitioners concede than the current market value of the property in question since it does not appear that ..... all these measures because of the implication they carry upon their face that the people who have heretofore owned slaves intend to ..... in contrast the bill was repeatedly and vehemently attacked in the face of emphatic denials by its sponsors on the ground that it .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax, Bombay Vs. RamnaraIn Kapur and Co. Pvt. Lt ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-29-1968
Reported in: [1968]69ITR719(Bom)
..... ordinary and preference shares of each class and debentures of the face value of rs 60 000 of the amalgamated coffee estates ltd ..... that 6 000 ordinary and preference shares and debentures of the face value of rs 60 000 of the amalgamated coffee estates ltd ..... of 6 000 ordinary and preference shares and debentures of the face value of rs 60 000 the company carried on negotiations through correspondence .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGaya Rai Vs. State of Bihar
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jul-28-1968
Reported in: 1969(1)UJ470(SC)
first information report he had however been iden tified by face by p ws 8 and 26 in court these two
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrithvi Singh Vs. the State
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Dec-11-1968
Reported in: 1968WLN275
the witness has deposed that when prithvi singh fired his face was towards the south he has further stated that immediately
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTConcrete Spun Pipe Works Vs. Sales Tax Officer
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-10-1968
Reported in: [1969]24STC48(All)
order passed by him rectify any mistake apparent on the face of the record of assessment 3 the jurisdiction of the assessment years the petitioner challenges the jurisdiction of the sales tax officer to issue the notice under section 22 of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOestereich Vs. Selective Svc. Bd.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-16-1968
that it was plain on the record and on the face of the act that an exemption had been granted and or negatively to an order to report for induction emphasis added the remedy for one who responds affirmatively cannot of course
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial