Face Value - Judgment Search Results

Jagdev Singh Vs. Sardarni Prem Parkash Kaur and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR2002P& H330

on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record or for any other sufficient reason desires

Krishna Bihar Pandey and ors. Vs. State

Court: Patna

from his double barrel gun which straightway hit on the face of ashok pandey who dropped there accusations were attributed to

Bpl Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... the company the company does get benefited with enhancement of its public esteem shareholders wealth value this also facilitates institutional support funding for the company besides it also helps the ..... brokers who dealt in the scrips bpl videocon and sterlite and had large purchase positions faced payment problems and could not discharge their commitments towards pay in liabilities it appears .....

J. Pushpalatha Vs. Election Tribunal and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2003(1)ALD488; 2004(5)ALT386

tribunal can be a result of error apparent on the face of the record 36 in important public records such as

Hindusthan Paper Corporation Ltd. Vs. Wellbrines Chemicals Private Ltd ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2002)3CALLT114(HC)

..... many redundant words and the presumption against surplusage is of little value in their construction so in the instant case if the joint ..... on erroneous proposition of law and which is apparent on the face of the award c the arbitrators awarded demurrage as liquidated ..... consider the material evidence and the same is demonstrated from the face of the award in support of this the learned counsel submitted .....

Nazir Ahmad Shah Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2003(1)JKJ785

above reflected 6 what constitutes an error apparent on the face of the record has to be left to be determined has caused failure of justice the respondents in their income tax returns have admitted acceptance of rent from the plaintiff petitioner

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Shiv Dutt Sharma

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2004ACJ2049

own conduct but it is peril which would have been faced by any other employee or any other member of the peril was brought about by the employee himself that he added or extended the peril or that the peril was not

United States Vs. Drayton

Court: US Supreme Court

onboard officer hoover knelt on the driver s seat and faced the rear of the bus he could observe the passengers

Rajendra and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2003CriLJ1821

dead body of manoj ist and iind degree burn on face upper part of chest right upper arm backupper part blisters

Dr. Sant Singh Vs. State of Punjab

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: II(2003)DMC232

order dated 18 2 2002 summoned the petitioners accused to face trial under sections 406 498a i rc along with ranbir