Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 8 of about 5,300 results (0.200 seconds)

Nutan Warehousing Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in : (2007)106TTJ(Pune.)137

..... arises.46. in the case of khan carpets v. cit it was held by the allahabad high court that 'reasonableness' within the meaning of sub-section (2) of section 40a of the act was to be determined after taking into account the legitimate needs of the business or profession of the assessee and the 'fair market value of the services ..... films only in godowns constructed strictly in conformity with the specifications laid down in the said rules and in a place to be approved by the chief inspector of explosives, government of india. a place at mahim in mumbai was approved and the assessee company, after purchasing a plot of land there, constructed 13 units thereon, 12 ..... 4, is whether the lease rent and the warehousing charges received by the assessee are to be assessed under the head 'income from house property' under section 22 of the act. the annual value of property consisting of any buildings or land appurtenant thereto of which the assessee is the owner, other than such portions of such property .....

Mohd. Akbar Butt Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 138(2007)DLT43; 2006(91)DRJ242

..... mohd. akbar butt has been found guilty. they have been along with mohd. akbar butt charged for the commission of the offence punishable under section 6 of the explosive substances act, 1908. the findings of the trial court against accused- appellant shahnawaj latif and his brother shahid latif are contained in para nos. 59 ..... appeal no. 303 of 2004 of appellant mohd. akbar butt partly by setting aside his conviction under section 6 of the explosive substances act, 1908. his conviction and punishment imposed on him under section 4 read with section 5 of the said act, however, stand confirmed. crl. appeal no. 552 of 2003 of appellants shahnawaj latif and shahid latif ..... the court of sessions. learned additional sessions judge framed a charge for the offence punishable under section 6 of the explosive substances act against all the three accused. a separate charge under section 4 read with section 5 of the act of 1908 was also framed against accused mohd. akbar butt for his having been found in .....

Hemadhar Hazarika Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

..... it is found that there is substance in the allegation, the victim should be suitably compensated by the state and the requisite sanction under section 6 of the central act should be granted for instruction of prosecution and/or a civil suit or other proceedings against the person/ persons responsible for such violation.22 ..... and steel glass etc. remained intact. the deceased, even according to the version of the army, while opening the door of the hut, got injured in the explosion and reduced into pieces of human flesh, but the ulfa literature, ammunition, medicines, tooth brush, tooth paste, aluminium vessels, steel glass etc. remained intact. concoction ..... lots of arms and ammunitions, medicines, letter pads, literature, tooth brush, tooth paste, aluminiunl vessels, steel glass etc. everything else got perished in the explosion except the seized articles which remained intact. the human flesh found in the hut was collected by the army and handed over to the police for postmortem examination .....

Suraj Singh @ Suraj Bhan Singh Vs. State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... basis of the statement of one syed basumul haque, officer incharge, begusarai police station under sections 207, 223, 136, 324, 353, 216a of the indian penal code and sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27, and 35 of the arms act read with sections 3, 4, and 5 of the explosives act. the petitioner along with other co-accused, namely, shankar singh, mukesh singh, binod ..... (iv) it is in the expediency of the larger interest of justice, the high court may pass an order as incorprated under clauses (i) to (iv) of sub-section (1) of section 407 cr.p.c., as quoted above.6. from a plain perusal of all the three applications, none of the aforesaid grounds are attracted. in other words, the court ..... court of fast track court no. iv, begusarai, arising out of barauni p.s.case no. 406 of 1992 under sections 353, 307/34 of the indian penal code and sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the arms act. as the synopsis of this case, provides by the state, discloses, one uma shankar singh, assistant inspector of police, .....

A.S. Shirsat Vs. State of Maharashtra and 12 ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2006(6)BomCR273; 2007CriLJ548

..... to the additional chief secretary, home department, bombay in a sensitive case involving a notorious gangster and pertaining to the illegal smuggling and concealment of arms and explosives. the joint commissioner of police proposed his name keeping in view the experience of the respondent no. 3 in such important matters as a prosecutor and forwarded shri ..... public prosecutors. rules 21 and 22 thereof read thus:' 21. appointment of special public prosecutor -(1) the remembrancer of legal affairs shall appoint under sub-section (8) of section 24 of the code of criminal procedure, any person, who has been in practice as an advocate for not less than ten years, as a special ..... nikam's consent to act as prosecutor in the said matter. the proposal for appointment of the respondent no. 3 as special public prosecutor was processed by various authorities of the state .....

The Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Dalmia Cements (B) Limited and ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2006(111)ECC735; 2006LC735(Madras)

..... 3 of the cenvat credit rules, 2002, confirmed the order of the original authority and held that the first respondent/company is not eligible for cenvat credit on the explosives used inasmuch as they were used outside their factory.2.4. on further appeal by the first respondent/company, the customs, excise and service tax appellate tribunal, chennai ..... . hence, these appeals raising the following substantial questions of law:c.m.a. no. 3389 of 2004:(i) whether the tribunal is correct in holding that the explosives which are used outside the factory are eligible for cenvat credit as inputs when the definition of inputs under rule 57aa of the central excise rules, 1944 and 2 ..... apex court observed as under:19. in this background, the question arose in cce v. j.k. udaipur udyog ltd. : 2004(171)elt289(sc) , whether the explosives used for blasting purposes in the mines and which had not been used in the factory premises for production or in relation to the manufacture of cement could qualify for .....

Manoj Singh and Dharma Mahato @ Dharam Nath Mahato and ors. Vs. State ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(1)CHN123

..... for the defence when firearm was not seized. the ballistic expert in such a situation only would have reported that the used bullets contain materials of explosive substance and some amount of gun shot residue. non-sending of blood-stained earth for chemical examination and pellets for ballistic examination is not fatal in ..... relatives of the deceased dinanath dubey are not witnesses of the occurrence and naturally no adverse presumption could be drawn against the prosecution under section 114(g) of the evidence act for non-examination of relatives of deceased. dhananjay singh as it appears only gave a cryptic information relating to the incident and it was ..... presence of witnesses was marked ext. 3. he also seized remnants of exploded bomb including burnt jute having smell of explosive substance, some pieces of small sticks, some small nails having smell of explosive substance and two live bombs by preparing a seizure list (ext. 4). during investigation he received one case docket from .....

Partap Steel Rolling Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2007)9VST629(P& H)

..... as to entitle the assessee to claim modvat credit under rule 57a of the central excise rules, 1944 and held as under:admittedly, explosives fall under chapter 36 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act, 1985. the particular items used by the appellant come under headings 36.01, 36.02 and 36.03. therefore, they fall ..... activity and without which the activity of manufacture may be commercially inexpedient, such consumable stores or materials can be purchased by an assessee free of tax under section 13(1)(b). kathi is part of such consumable stores which would be necessarily required in the activity of marketing the goods which is essentially connected with ..... and the goods intended for use in that process or activity should be considered to be goods required in the manufacture of taxable goods for sale. under section 13(1)(b), the articles which can be purchased tax-free on furnishing a prescribed certificate by a manufacturer must be either raw materials or processing materials .....

Gulf Oil Corporation Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in : (2008)111ITD124(Hyd.)

..... dated 21.9.2005 for assessment year 2002-03.2. the first issue relates to the computation of book profits under section 115jb of the income-tax act, 1961(the act). the assessee company is engaged in the manufacture of detonators, industrial explosives and its accessories. it returned total loss of rs. 34,27,39,176 for the year under consideration. since the ..... of rs. 3,62,005 on account of delayed payment of provident fund; (c) disallowance of rs. 9,34,455 on account of sales-tax payment under section 43b of the act.8. after hearing the parties, so far as the first item is concerned, it is not disputed that the entire payment was made before the end of the ..... also does not help the revenue as it merely says that sometimes, appropriation account is included as a separate section of the profit & loss account. but, as we have seen earlier, parts-ii and iii of schedule-vi to the companies act do not speak of appropriation account at all. in the light of this discussion, we are convinced that .....

Meeting Sk. and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(1)CHN271

..... in that manner. on the basis of such complaint/fir mayureshwar p.s. case no. 39/95 dated 27.4.95 under section 460 of the ipc read with section 9(b)(ii) of the indian explosives act (in short i.e. act) was started against accused meeting sk. and moslem sk. (the present appellants). after completing investigation the investigating officer (in short i.o ..... .) submitted chargesheet against the appellants moslem sk. and meeting sk. under section 458/326/307/34 of ipc and under section 9(b)(ii) of the i.e. act. the trial that followed .....