Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Year: 2006 Page 3 of about 5,300 results (0.139 seconds)

R (on the Application of Gillan (Fc) and Another (Fc)) (Appellants) Vs ...

Court : House of Lords

..... supplemented existing criminal law statutes such as the explosive substances act 1883 and the aviation and maritime security act 1990. it replaced some earlier statutes such as the prevention of terrorism (temporary provisions) act 1989 as amended. it contained, in section 1, a far-reaching definition of terrorism: "(1) in this act 'terrorism' means the use or threat of ..... system. (3) the use or threat of action falling within subsection (2) which involves the use of firearms or explosives is terrorism whether or not subsection (1)(b) is satisfied. (4) in this section €” (a) 'action' includes action outside the united kingdom, (b) a reference to any person or to property ..... ac 115, 130, 131. reliance was also placed on home office circular 038/2004 (july 2004), authorisations of stop and search powers under section 44 of the terrorism act, addressed to chief officers of police, which emphasised that "powers should only be authorised where they are absolutely necessary to support a force's .....

Arjun Prasad Singh @ Arjun Mahto Vs. the State of Bihar

Court : Patna

..... basis of a report given to the police, patna g.r.p.s. case no. 254 of 1990 under section 302/34 of the indian penal code, section 27 of the arms act and section 3/4 of the explosive substance act was registered against three unknown persons. police, after investigation, submitted charge sheet against three accused persons, namely, binod yadav ..... of 1997, so far as petitioner is concerned, supplementary charge sheet dated 17.7.1997 was submitted against him under sections 304/302/34, 120b of the indian penal code, section 3/5 of the explosive substance act. after submission of the charge sheet against the petitioner, the learned magistrate had taken cognizance of the offence and the ..... pending for commitment.6. mr. kumar, then contends that the petitioner can be summoned to face trial by the sessions judge in exercise of power under section 193 of the code of criminal procedure, this issue is academic. here on the basis of supplementary charge sheet cognizance has been taken and the matter is .....

Mahabir Vegetable Oils Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Haryana and ors ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : JT2006(3)SC544; (2006)143PLR159; 2006(3)SCALE178; (2006)3SCC620; [2006]145STC350(SC)

..... 2 ch. 1]. a retrospective effect to an amendment by way of a delegated legislation could be given, thus, only after coming into force of sub-section (2a) of section 64 of the act and not prior thereto.35. by reason of note 2, certain rights were conferred. although there lies a distinction between vested rights and accrued rights as by ..... dates. furthermore, on 6.09.1996, civil construction work started at site. plans submitted by the appellant for getting permission for storage of hexane were sanctioned by the explosives department on 19.9.1996 and licence was finally given on 11.3.1997. on 26.09.1996, process of installation of the plant started at the site. on ..... a promise. it was held:in this case the scheme being notified under the power in the state government to grant exemptions both under section 15 of the rst act and section 8(5) of the cst act in the public interest, the state government was competent to modify or revoke the grant for the same reason. thus what is granted .....

State of J and K Vs. Suraj Parkash and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2006(2)JKJ663

..... and ammunition explosive which suspected to be of political nature.15. explosive act, 1984 (act no. iv of 1984) and explosive substances act, 1908 (act no. iii, vi of 1908).16. cinematography act of 1952/video piracy read with the copy of right (amendment act), 1984.17. public gambling act (svt. 1977).18. narcotic drugs and psychotropic substance act, 1985.19 ..... of offence/s in cognizable offences precedes investigation under chapter xiv of part-v of the code of criminal procedure, svt, 1989 and follows cognizance under section 190 in chapter xv-part-vi of the code.7. facts, appearing from the investigation report of any police officer, and not the jurisdiction to ..... kashmir homecdepartmentnotificationsrinagar, the 3rd june, 1999.sro-202. - in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (o) of sub-section (1) of section 4 of the code of criminal procedure, samvat 1989 (act no. xxiii of 1989) and in supersession of notification sro-133 dated 2-4-1991, the government hereby declare the officer .....

The State by the Psi of Bhatkal Town Police Station Vs. Karim M. S/O M ...

Court : Karnataka

..... , therefore the prosecution has successfully proved the guilt of possession of the country bombs by all the accused persons. the accused are convicted under section 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 r/w section 34 ipc. the accused are sentenced to r.i. for a period of two years each and to pay a fine of rs. 20,000/- each in default to ..... investigation, the charge sheet is filed. the trial court finds that there were five inmates and only 3 bombs were found hence comes to the conclusion that conscious possession of explosives by the accused is not proved and acquitted them.4. the evidence of p.w.1 the panch witness and the evidence of pws. 2 to 5 who were the ..... k. sreedhar rao, j.1. a.1 to a.5 were charged for offence under section 5 of the explosive substances act 1908. the facts of the prosecution disclose that on 10-11-1997 at 7-30 p.m. a1 is the driver of the jeep bearing no. kl-11/c-5925, .....

Sankaran Moitra Vs. Sadhna Das and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC1599; (2006)3GLR2304; JT2006(4)SC34; 2006(3)SCALE414; (2006)4SCC584

..... rival political parties at subhash sarobar and the case was registered as case no. 111 of 2001 for offences punishable under sections 148, 149 and 336 ipc read with sections 3 & 5 of explosive substances act, 1908 against the deceased and others and investigation started. the appellant, along with other police officers, rushed to the spot ..... what is relevant for our purpose is to notice that investigations into the two crimes registered, namely, case no. 111 under sections 148, 149, 336 ipc read with sections 3 and 5 of explosive substances act and case no. 112, registered on the complaint made by the complainant herein on 11.5.2001, have not been completed ..... being phoolbagan police station case no. 111 dated 10.5.2001 against 20/30 persons including robindranath das under section 148/149/336 of the india penal code and section 3 and 5 of explosive substance act.that the petitioner submits that initially the opposite party no. 1 lodged an information against some unknown police personnel .....

The Government of Karnataka Represented by the Executive Engineer Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR328(Kar); ILR2006KAR1640; 2006(3)KarLJ360

..... provides the manner of blasting. it states that blasting in a manner to produce over-breakage shall not be permitted. the blasting shall be done by using explosive best suited to the strata concerned so as to avoid undue over break. it further states that special care shall be taken to prevent over breakages or loosening ..... the case. after registering the petition, the court issued notices to the claimant as also to the department. the department has filed a petition under section 30 of the arbitration act disputing the award of the arbitrator. the civil court on consideration of the contentions of the parties has passed the aforementioned judgment and decree. the department ..... rate of interest in concerned, it is pointed out that award of interest at 18% is on a higher side. the court having regard to section 29 of the arbitration act ought to have awarded interest at a reasonable rate.6. on the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the claimant broadly submits that the award does .....

Manjai Yadav and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar (Now Jharkhand)

Court : Jharkhand

Reported in : [2006(2)JCR444(Jhr)]

..... they have suppressed the material aspects, namely, injury on a1. the answer given by the doctor that a1 could have suffered injury on account of an accidental explosion of bomb is not supported by any material placed on record. it is also not the case of the prosecution that the said information to the doctor was ..... given by the doctor, p.w.8, in court is not mentioned by any of the eye-witnesses either in their evidence or in their statement recorded under section 161 cr.p.c. learned counsel further submits that the prosecution suppressed not only the injury report, ext.a, but also suppressed ext.d, the fardbeyan, given ..... nature.7. after completion of the investigation, the final report was filed against the appellants accused as well as a10 who was acquitted. when they were questioned under section 313 cr.p.c, they denied all the incriminating circumstances.8. learned counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the prosecution witnesses suppressed the genesis and origin of .....

Subir Guha Thakurta Vs. Johnson and Johnson Ltd. and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2006(4)CHN459,[2006(110)FLR606],(2006)3LLJ408Cal

..... on the evidence adduced by the parties, the writ court should interfere with the conclusions of the tribunal and he relied upon the decisions reported in baldev singh v. indian explosive ltd. 76 cwn 342, raza textiles ltd., rampur v. income tax officer : [1973]87itr539(sc) (supra) where the hon'ble supreme court held that whether ..... service and pay him back wages within 30 days from the date of publication of the award.7. subsequent thereto, in pursuance of the provisions of section 17 of the said act, governor was pleased to publish the said award by a notification dated september 10, 2003.8. the respondent company filed a writ petition before this ..... 2003 published the award.5. the learned tribunal came to conclusion that sri subir guhathakurta appellant herein, falls within the definition of the workman under section 2(s) of the said act and also held that the reference is maintainable in law issues referred before the learned tribunal are that (a) whether the termination of service of .....

Maqbool HussaIn and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in : 2007(1)JKJ226

..... and ammunition were recovered from the possession of accused and trial court rightly convicted and sentenced the accused for the commission of offence punishable under section 7/25 arms act.71. in view of the above discussion, this review petition merits to be partly allowed and partly rejected. viewed thus, the order of ..... is relevant, insofar as they are necessary for the purpose, are relevant. so the evidence of identification is a relevant piece of evidence under section 9 of the evidence act where the evidence consists of identification of the accused person at his trial. the statement of the witness made in the court, a fortiori ..... shafi, ghulam hussan wani, nissar hussain and lal hussain were apprehended and arms, ammunition and explosives were recovered from their possession details of which are given in the seizure memos.4. accused had brought the arms, ammunitions, explosives from paskistan after crossing border and obtaining training from isi, in order to escalate the militant .....