Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: explosives act 1884 section 4 definitions Sorted by: old Court: karnataka Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 239 results (0.114 seconds)

The State by the Psi of Bhatkal Town Police Station Vs. Karim M. S/O M ...

Court : Karnataka

..... , therefore the prosecution has successfully proved the guilt of possession of the country bombs by all the accused persons. the accused are convicted under section 5 of the explosive substances act, 1908 r/w section 34 ipc. the accused are sentenced to r.i. for a period of two years each and to pay a fine of rs. 20,000/- each in default to ..... investigation, the charge sheet is filed. the trial court finds that there were five inmates and only 3 bombs were found hence comes to the conclusion that conscious possession of explosives by the accused is not proved and acquitted them.4. the evidence of p.w.1 the panch witness and the evidence of pws. 2 to 5 who were the ..... k. sreedhar rao, j.1. a.1 to a.5 were charged for offence under section 5 of the explosive substances act 1908. the facts of the prosecution disclose that on 10-11-1997 at 7-30 p.m. a1 is the driver of the jeep bearing no. kl-11/c-5925, .....

The Government of Karnataka Represented by the Executive Engineer Vs. ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006(3)ARBLR328(Kar); ILR2006KAR1640; 2006(3)KarLJ360

..... provides the manner of blasting. it states that blasting in a manner to produce over-breakage shall not be permitted. the blasting shall be done by using explosive best suited to the strata concerned so as to avoid undue over break. it further states that special care shall be taken to prevent over breakages or loosening ..... the case. after registering the petition, the court issued notices to the claimant as also to the department. the department has filed a petition under section 30 of the arbitration act disputing the award of the arbitrator. the civil court on consideration of the contentions of the parties has passed the aforementioned judgment and decree. the department ..... rate of interest in concerned, it is pointed out that award of interest at 18% is on a higher side. the court having regard to section 29 of the arbitration act ought to have awarded interest at a reasonable rate.6. on the other hand, learned counsel appearing for the claimant broadly submits that the award does .....

D. Pavanesh Vs. the State of Karnataka Represented by Its Chief Secret ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2006Kant97; ILR2006KAR861; 2006(2)KarLJ396

..... raised on behalf of the appellants herein that the state, being higher authority, having been delegated with the power of making declaration in terms of section 22-a of the act, would not be abused is stated to be rejected. such a question does not arise herein as the provision has been held to be ultra ..... document is refused to be registered by the sub-registrar in terms of sub-section (2) of section 22-a of the act, evidently no appeal would lie. section 17 of the act enumerates the instruments registration of which is compulsory under the act, whereas section 49 of the act encompasses the effect of a failure to register. registration of documents, however, is ..... and in doing so even the power of the judiciary is very limited. even for the said purpose, the part dealing with public policy in section 23 of the contract act is required to be construed in conjunction with other parts thereof.(b) the respondent-khatedar tenant of agricultural lands, appointed attorney authorizing him to look .....

Marico Industries Ltd. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [2006]148STC17(Kar)

..... only negate the rule of law and open the floodgates to arbitrariness and permissiveness which is frowned upon by article 14 of the constitution of india, as an act lacking in fairness in state action.34. it is inevitable that the impugned legislation has to be declared as unconstitutional only for the reason that the state has ..... is not a reasonable classification; that the state has not justified the levy of higher rate of tax on sale of branded coconut oil alone and therefore the act no. 5 of 2001 should be inevitably declared as unconstitutional.25. sri vedamurthy, learned government pleader appearing on behalf of the respondents, has sought to defend stoutly ..... it is in the background of such versions, the present writ petition is required to be examined to pronounce on the validity of the impugned legislation, i.e., act no. 5 of 2001.20. i have heard sri sarangan, learned senior counsel instructed by sri rabi-nathan, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner and sri vedamurthy .....

Sanjay K. Shetty Vs. B. Narayana Shetty

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : III(2006)BC545; ILR2006KAR1080; 2006(2)KarLJ257

..... found in vakalath, written statement and affidavit of the defendant were sent to him for his examination and submitted his expert's opinion as required under section 45 of the evidence act. as could be seen from the original record, the report is submitted by the commissioner, the same is not marked as an exhibit by examining ..... to render justice wherever reasonably possible. further in : air1996sc1140 the apex court has laid down with regard to the hand writing expert's opinion under section 45 and 47 of the evidence act, after referring to its earlier decision in : 1979crilj17 , wherein it has been held that the same is applicable to the civil matters while ..... of a handwriting expert.11. in another decision in state (delhiadministration) v. pali ram : 1979crilj17 , wherein the apex court after interpretation of sections 45 and 73 of the evidence act law is laid down in support of the proposition that it is not advisable that a judge should take upon himself the task of comparing the .....

Shivappa Vs. Administrator, Mahadev Textile Mills

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2006Kant114; ILR2006KAR1175; 2006(1)KarLJ569

..... him asking him to hand over the possession by the respondent-administrator.7. now, let me consider the substantial question of law raised.8. as per section 41(j) of the special relief act, 1963, injunction cannot be granted against the true owner of the land. the trial court as well as the lower appellate court have held that the ..... who tries to dispossess him.6. per contra, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent has submitted that by virtue of the ordinance passed by the government as per sections 4 and 5 of the karnataka ordinance no. 11 of 1986, all the properties belonging to k.c.t. mills vested with the government and the government has ..... made to recover the possession by issuing a notice under due process of law on vesting of the property with the government by virtue of the ordinance and the act of the defendant in attempting to take possession is in accordance with law. under such circumstances, both the courts below have rightly dismissed the suit of the plaintiff .....

B. Ravikumar Vs. Ananth

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2006CriLJ1577; ILR2006KAR792; 2006(1)KarLJ581

..... parties and after going through the entire material on record, the only question is whether this is a case fit enough to exercise the power conferred on this court under section 482 of the cr.p.c. in this regard, it is worthwhile to refer to the recent pronouncement of the apex court in the case of state of punjab v ..... give effect to an order under the code, (ii) to prevent abuse of the process of court, and (iii) to otherwise secure the ends of justice. inherent jurisdiction under the section though wide has to be exercised sparingly, carefully and with caution and only when such exercise is justified by the tests specifically laid down in the ..... section itself. it is to be exercised ex debito justitiae to do real and substantial justice for the administration of which alone courts exist.6. if the facts and circumstances of .....

S. Kugashankar Vs. Subhash Chand Goel S/O Lt. NaraIn Dass Goel,

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR3689; 2008(4)KarLJ429

..... on the facts of this case the ground of delay cannot be invoked to deny relief to the plaintiff.4. 1989 (2) supp scc 409 head notespecific relief act, 1877 - section 22- grant of discretionary relief under - agreement to sell leasehold right in plot of land by defendant to plaintiff - plaintiff only paying earnest money of rs. ..... individual and not a family.4. m. veera raghaviah v. m. china veeriah and anr. air 1975 andhra pradesh 350 [db]) (head note (c)(c) specific relief act (1963), section 17 - specific performance of contract - property belonging to co-parceners - contract by one of them to sell the whole property not binding on others - specific performance cannot ..... this argument. the property, no doubt passes by survivorship, but there is no question of any vesting or divesting in the sense contemplated by section 12 of the act. to interpret section 12 to include cases of devolution by survivorship on the death of a member of the joint family would be to deny any practical effect to .....

N.C. Chandrashekar Vs. Sidda Gangamma and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : III(2006)ACC188; 2007ACJ1747; AIR2006Kant164; 2006(2)KarLJ386

K. Sreedhar Rao, J. 1. Tribunal has awarded compensation to the petitioners in M.V.C, No. 1559 of 2000 for death of one Rangaswamy. Tribunal directed the owner-dealer to pay the compensation. Claim against the insurer is dismissed.2. Facts disclose that M/s. Bajaj Transport Limited is the marketing wing of the manufacturer. The appellant is the dealer. The appellant placed indent for delivery of vehicles at Davanagere. The appellant entered into contract with M/s. Chandru Transport for delivery of the vehicles from Pune to Davanagere. The 5th respondent has issued a transit policy. The vehicle in question is a tempo tax, a passenger service vehicle but the vehicle was yet to be registered as a public service vehicle as on the date of transit and the accident. The driver of the tempo tax permitted the deceased to travel in the tempo. During the course of journey, the accident occurred. The Tribunal dismissed the claim against the insurer on the ground that the transit permit does not cr...

Smt. Jabeen Taj and ors. Vs. Masjid-e-pension Mohalla, A. Wakf Institu ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR1146; 2006(2)KarLJ357

..... and includes any premises belonging to or taken on lease by or on behalf of-(i) a local authority,(ii) any company as defined in section 3 of the companies act. 1955 (central act 1 of 1956) in which not less than fifty one percent of the paid up share capital is held by the state government or any ..... a wakf property., the same is not managed by the state wakf board, and there is no merit in the contention of the appellant/defendant.7. section 2(e) of the act reads as under-'public premises' means any premises belonging to or allotted to state government or taken on lease or requisitioned by or on behalf of ..... the tungabhadra board constituted by the government of india under sub-section (4) of section 66 of the andhra state act, 1953 (central act 30 of 1953),(vii) a university established under the karnataka state universities act, 1976 (karnataka act 28 of 1976) or the university of agricultural sciences act, 1963, (karnataka act 22 of 1963).8. since the subject matter of the property .....